Selection bias and the big four premium: New evidence using heckman and matching models

Accounting and Business Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 139-166

  Clatworthy, Mark A ^a   Makepeace, Gerald H ^a   Peel, Michael J ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audit fees; Big four premium; Matching estimators; Propensity score matching; Selection bias; Two step models

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951971708     PISSN: 00014788     EISSN: 21594260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2009.9663354     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beatty, R.P. (1993). 'The economic determinants of auditor compensation in the initial public offerings market', Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2): 294-302.
2. Black, D. and Smith, J. (2004). 'How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching'. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2): 99-124.
3. Blinder, A. (1973). 'Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural variables'. Journal of Human Resources, 8: 436-455.
4. Blokdijk, H., Drieenhuizen, F., Simunic, D. and Stein, M. (2006). 'An analysis of cross-sectional differences in big and non-big public accounting firms' audit programs'. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 25(1): 27-48.
5. Bryson, A., Dorsett, R. and Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies, Working Paper, No. 4. HMSO, London.
6. Chan, P., Ezzamel, M. and Gwilliam, D. (1993). 'Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies'. Journal of Business Finance &Accounting, 20(6): 765-786.
7. Chaney, P.K., Jeter, D.C. and Shivakumar, L. (2004). 'Selfselection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms'. Accounting Review, 79(1): 51-72. (Pubitemid 38260525)
8. Chaney, P.K., Jeter, D.C. and Shivakumar, L. (2005). 'Selfselection of auditors and size nonlinearities in auditing'. Working paper, Vanderbilt University.
9. Clatworthy, M.A. and Peel, M.J. (2007). 'The effect of corporate status on external audit fees: evidence from the UK'. Journal of Business Finance &Accounting, 34(1 &2): 169-201.
10. Collis, J., Jarvis, R. and Skerratt, L. (2004). 'The demand for the audit in small companies in the UK.' Accounting and Business Research, 34(2): 87-100.
11. Copley, P.A. and Douthett, E.B. (2002). 'The association between auditor choice, ownership retained, and earnings disclosure by firms making initial public offerings'. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(1): 49-75.
12. Craswell, A., Francis, J. and Taylor, S. (1995). 'Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20: 297-322.
13. Datar, S.M., Feltham, G.A. and Hughes, J.S. (1991). 'The role of audits and audit quality in valuing new issues'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14: 3-49.
14. Doyle, J.T., Ge, W. and McVay, S. (2007). Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting'. The Accounting Review, 82(5): 1141-1170.
15. Ezzamel, M., Gwilliam, D. and Holland, K. (1996). 'Some empirical evidence from publicly quoted companies on the relationship between the pricing of audit and nonaudit services'. Accounting and Business Research, 27(1): 3-16.
16. Firth, M. (1997). 'The provision of non-audit services and the pricing of audit fees'. Journal of Business Finance &Accounting, 24(3): 511-525.
17. Francis, J. and Lennox, C. (2008). 'Selection models in accounting research', HKUST Working paper, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1120796.
18. Francis, J., Maydew, E.L. and Sparks, H.C. (1999). 'The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accru- als'. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18: 17-34.
19. Francis, J. and Simon, D.T. (1987). 'A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the U.S. audit market'. Accounting Review, 62(1): 145-157.
20. Giles, M. (2003). 'Correcting for selectivity bias in the estimation of road crash costs'. Applied Economics, 35(11): 1291-1301. (Pubitemid 37024580)
21. Giroux, G. and Jones, R. (2007). 'Investigating the audit fee structure of local authorities in England and Wales'. Accounting and Business Research, 37(1): 21-37
22. Greene, W.H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
23. Hamilton, J., Li, Y. and Stokes, D. (2005). 'Listed company audit self-selection bias and audit fee premiums'. Working paper, University of Technology Sydney.
24. Hartman, R. (1991). 'A Monte Carlo analysis of alternative estimators in models involving selectivity'. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9: 41-49.
25. Hay, D.C., Knechel, W.R. and Wong, N. (2006). 'Audit fees: a meta analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes'. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1): 141-191. (Pubitemid 43528545)
26. Heckman J., Tobias, J.L. and Vytlacil, E. (2001). 'Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programs'. Southern Economic Journal, 68(2): 210-223.
27. Ho, D., Kosuke, I., King, G. and Stuart, E. (2007). 'Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for improving parametric causal inference'. Political Analysis, 15: 199-236.
28. Ireland, J.C. and Lennox, C.S. (2002). 'The large audit firm fee premium: a case of selectivity bias?'. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 17(1): 73-91.
29. Keasey, K. and Watson, R. (1991). 'An agency perspective of auditor change in small firms'. Journal of Small Firm Finance, 1(1): 45-59.
30. Lennox, C. (1999). 'Are large auditors more accurate than small auditors?'. Accounting and Business Research, 29(3): 217-228.
31. Leung, S.F. and Yu, S. (2000). 'Collinearity and two-step estimation of sample selection models: problems, origins, and remedies'. Computational Economics, 15: 173-199.
32. Leuven, E. and Sianesi, B. (2003). 'PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing'. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/ s432001.html.
33. Li, K. and Prabhala, N.R. (2007). 'Self-selection models in corporate finance'. In B.E. Eckbo (ed.) Handbook of Corporate Finance, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Little, R. (1985). 'A note about models for selectivity bias'. Econometrica, 53: 1469-1474.
35. Little, R. and Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley &Sons.
36. Marriott, N., Marriott, P., Collis, J. and Son, D. (2007). 'The accountant and the provision of financial advice to UK smaller companies'. Working paper, University of Winchester.
37. McMeeking, K., Peasnell, K. and Pope, P.F. (2006). 'The determinants of the UK big firms premium'. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3): 207-231.
38. McMeeking, K., Peasnell, K. and Pope, P.F. (2007). 'The effect of audit firm mergers on audit pricing in the UK'. Accounting and Business Research, 37(4): 301-319.
39. Moizer, P. (1997). 'Auditor reputation: the international empirical evidence'. International Journal of Auditing, 1(1): 61-74.
40. Neumayer, E. (2003). 'Do human rights matter in bilateral aid allocation? A quantitative analysis of 21 donor countries'. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3): 650-666. (Pubitemid 37110296)
41. Oaxaca, R. (1973). 'Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets'. International Economic Review, 14: 693-709.
42. Oxera (2006). Competition and Choice in the UK Audit Market, London: Oxera Consulting.
43. Peel, M.J. and Roberts, R. (2003). 'Audit fee determinants and auditor premiums: evidence from the micro-firm submarket'. Accounting and Business Research, 33(3): 207-233.
44. Pittman, J.A. and Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37: 113-116.
45. Pong, C. and Whittington, G. (1994). 'The determinants of audit fees: some empirical models'. Journal of Business Finance &Accounting, 21(8): 1071-1095.
46. Puhani, P.A. (2000). 'The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique'. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14: 53-68. (Pubitemid 30137406)
47. Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983). 'The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effect'. Biometrika, 70(1): 41-55.
48. Seetharaman, A., Gul, F.A. and Lynn, S.G. (2002). 'Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 91-115.
49. Simonsen, M. and Skipper, L. (2006). 'The costs of motherhood: an analysis using matching estimators'. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(7): 919-934. (Pubitemid 44952019)
50. Simunic, D. (1980). 'The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence'. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1): 161-190.
51. Simunic, D. and Stein, M.T. (1996). 'The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: a review of the economics and the evidence'. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15: 119-134.
52. Stock J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2003). Introduction to Econometrics. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
53. Stock J.H., Wright, J.H. and Yogo, M. (2002). 'A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalised method of moments'. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(4): 518-529.
54. Stolzenberg, R.M. and Relles, D.A. (1997). 'Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction'. American Sociological Review, 62: 494-507. (Pubitemid 127618929)
55. Titman, S. and Trueman, B. (1986). 'Information quality and the valuation of new issues'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8: 159-172.
56. Tucker, J. (2007). 'Is openness penalized? Stock returns around earnings warnings'. Accounting Review, 82(4): 1055-1087.
57. van der Klaauw, B. and Koning, R.H. (2003). 'Testing the normality assumption in the sample selection model with an application to travel demand'. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(1): 31-42. (Pubitemid 36116518)
58. White, H. (1980). 'A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity', Econometrica, (May): 817-838.
59. Winship, C. and Mare, R.D. (1992). 'Models for sample selection bias'. Annual Review of Sociology, 18: 237-250.