The Views of People With Spinal Cord Injury About the Use of Functional Electrical Stimulation

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 204-211

  Donovan Hall, Maggie K ^a   Burridge, Jane ^a   Dibb, Bridget ^b   Ellis Hill, Caroline ^c   Rushton, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Focus groups; Functional electrical stimulation; Health care provider perceptions; Patient perceptions; Psychosocial issues; Qualitative research; Spinal cord injury; Thematic analysis; User views

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

FOCUS GROUPS; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRI-CAL STIMULATIONS; HEALTH CARE PROVIDER PERCEPTION; HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; PATIENT PERCEPTION; PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPINAL CORD INJURY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; USER VIEW;

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; SCREENING; SPINAL CORD INJURY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 79952660214     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01211.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ragnarsson KT. Functional electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury: current use, therapeutic effects and future directions. Spinal Cord 2008;46:255-74.
2. Rupp R, Gerner HJ. Neuroprosthetics of the upper extremity: clinical application in spinal cord injury and challenges for the future. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007;97:419-26.
3. McDonald JW, Becker D. Spinal cord injury: promising interventions and realistic goals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:S38-49.
4. Hammel KW. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation (Theory and Practice). London: The Open University and Sage, 1995.
5. Meadows PM. Implant technology and usability. Artif Organs 2008;32:581-5.
6. Creasey GH, Ho CH, Triolo RJ, etal. Clinical application of electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27:365-75.
7. Agarwal S, Triolo RJ, Kobetic R, etal. Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercises, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:241-52.
8. Bajd T, Kralj A, Stefancic M, etal. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the lower extremities of incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Artif Organs 1999;25:403-9.
9. Tator CH. Review of treatment trials in human spinal cord injury: issues, difficulties, and recommendations. Neurosurgery 2006;59:957-87.
10. Brown-Triolog DL, Roach MJ, Nelson K, etal. Consumer perspectives on mobility: implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;36:659-69.
11. Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993;5:36-45.
12. Chiou Y-H, Luh J-J, Chen S-C, etal. Patient-driven loop control for hand function restoration in a non-invasive functional electrical stimulation system. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1499-505.
13. Day H, Jutal J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:31-7.
14. Kilgore KL, Scherer M, Bobblitt R, etal. Neuroprosthesis consumers' forum: consumer priorities for research directions. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:655-60.
15. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injuries population. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1371-83.
16. Anderson KD. Consideration of user priorities when developing neural prosthesis. J Neural Eng 2009;6:1-3.
17. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 4th Edition. London: Sage, 2009.
18. Barbour R. Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage, 2007.
19. Puchta C, Potter J. Focus Group Practice. London: Sage, 2004.
20. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
21. Anderson CJ, Krajci KA, Vogel LC. Life satisfaction in adults with paediatric-onset spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med 2002;25:184-90.
22. Anderson CJ, Vogel LC. Domain-specific satisfaction in adults with paediatric-onset spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 2003;41:684-91.
23. Kennedy P, Taylor NM, Duff J. Characteristics predicting effective outcomes after coping effectiveness training for patients with spinal cord injuries. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2005;12:93-8.
24. Hammel KW. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord 2004;42:491-502.
25. Hallin P, Sullivan M, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality. Spinal Cord 2000;38:509-23.
26. Lolne V, Severinsson E. Hope during the first months after acute spinal cord injury. Issues Innov Nurs Pract 2004;47:279-86.
27. NICE. Clinical Guideline 68. 2009.
28. Reimer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44-50.
29. Rogers EM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav 2002;27:989-93.