The robotic Whipple: Operative strategy and technical considerations

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-9

  MacKenzie, Shawn ^a   Kosari, Kambiz ^a   Sielaff, Timothy ^a   Johnson, Eric ^a  

^a Virginia Piper Cancer Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic resection; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic surgery; Robotic Whipple; Whipple

Indexed keywords

DISSECTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE SURGERY; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC RESECTION; PANCREATIC SURGERY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; ROBOTIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; ROBOTIC WHIPPLE; ROBOTICS SURGERY; WHIPPLE;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

EID: 79952627719     PISSN: 18632483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0216-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana G, Bianco FM et al (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24: 1646-1657.
2. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7): 777-784.
3. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Sener SF, Bilimoria MM, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ (2008) Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 207(4): 510-519.
4. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA (2006) Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 106(11): 2476-2481.
5. Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai R, Sosa JA (2009) Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship. Ann Surg 250(1): 159-165.
6. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232(6): 786-795.
7. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM (2009) The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship. J Am Coll Surg 208(4): 528-538.
8. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL (1998) Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 228(3): 429-438.
9. Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC (2009) Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 144(8): 713-721.
10. Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, Winter JM, Assumpcao L, Lillemoe KD, Wolfgang C, Hruban RH, Schulick RD, Yeo CJ, Choti MA (2007) Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery 141(5): 610-618.
11. Schwarz RE, Smith DD (2006) Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 13(9): 1189-1200.
12. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - 616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4(6): 567-579.
13. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology-V. 2. 2010. www. NCCN. org.
14. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1): 8-13.
15. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Clavien PA, Barkun JS (2007) Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure. Surgery 141(4): 420-426.
16. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2): 187-196.
17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2): 205-213.
18. Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA (2003) Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 196(6): 938-948.