Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure

Surgery

Volumn 141, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 420-426

  Strasberg, Steven M ^a   Linehan, David C ^a   Clavien, Pierre Alain ^b   Barkun, Jeffrey S ^c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; OCCLUSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CLOSURE; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS OCCLUSION; PANCREATOENTEROSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC FISTULA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 33947329043     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bassi C., Dervenis C., Butturini G., et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138 (2005) 8-13
2. Clavien P.A., Sanabria J.R., and Strasberg S.M. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111 (1992) 518-526
3. Barkun J.S., Wexler M.J., Hinchey E.J., et al. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 118 (1995) 703-709
4. Clavien P.A., Sanabria J.R., Mentha G., et al. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg 216 (1992) 618-626
5. Clavien P.A., Camargo Jr. C.A., Croxford R., et al. Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation. [see comment]. Ann Surg 220 (1994) 109-120
6. Berney T., Mentha G., Roth A.D., and Morel P. Results of surgical resection of liver metastases from non-colorectal primaries. Br J Surg 85 (1998) 1423-1427
7. Chautems R., Buhler L.H., Gold B., et al. Surgical management and long-term outcome of complicated liver hydatid cysts caused by Echinococcus granulosus. Surgery 137 (2005) 312-316
8. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2050-2059
9. Feldman L., Barkun J., Barkun A., et al. Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds. Surgery 122 (1997) 711-719
10. Hu J.C., Nelson R.A., Wilson T.G., et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 175 (2006) 541-546
11. Nelson H., Sargent D., Wieand H., et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2050-2059
12. Parikh M.S., Laker S., Weiner M., et al. Objective comparison of complications resulting from laparoscopic bariatric procedures. J Am Coll Surg 202 (2006) 252-261
13. Perugini R.A., Mason R., Czerniach D.R., et al. Predictors of complication and suboptimal weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a series of 188 patients. Arch Surg 138 (2003) 541-545
14. Quintana J.M., Arostegui I., Oribe V., et al. Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy. Qual Life Res 14 (2005) 815-825
15. Ros A., Gustafsson L., Krook H., et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234 (2001) 741-749
16. Stylopoulos N., Gazelle G.S., and Rattner D.W. Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation?. Ann Surg 236 (2002) 492-500
17. Targarona E.M., Espert J.J., Bombuy E., et al. Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. Arch Surg 135 (2000) 1137-1140
18. Dindo D., Demartines N., and Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240 (2004) 205-213
19. http://bmjjournals.com/epidem/epid.2.html. Quantifying disease in populations. Br Med J.
20. Nakai H., and Uemura A. Anastomotic failure following the surgery of the digestive tract. Shujutsu 24 (1970) 623-632
21. Greatorex G., Whitaker B.L., and Dixon R.A. Anastomotic failure in relation to blood transfusion and blood loss. Proc R Soc Med 63 (1970) 751
22. Grobmyer S.R., Rivadeneira D.E., Goodman C.A., et al. Pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 180 (2000) 117-120
23. Strasberg S.M., Drebin J.A., Mokadam N.A., et al. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg 194 (2002) 746-758
24. Conlon K.C., Labow D., Leung D., et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 234 (2001) 487-493
25. Yeo C.J., Cameron J.L., Maher M.M., et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222 (1995) 580-588
26. Lowy A.M., Lee J.E., Pisters P.W., et al. Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 226 (1997) 632-641
27. Brooks A.D., Marcus S.G., Gradek C., et al. Decreasing length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 135 (2000) 823-830
28. Shinchi H., Wada K., and Traverso L. The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy?. J Gastrointest Surg 10 (2006) 490-498
29. Fahy B.N., Frey C.F., Ho H.S., et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 183 (2002) 237-241
30. DeOliveira M.L., Winter J.M., Schafer M., Cunningham S.C., Cameron J.L., Yeo C.J., and Clavien P.A. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244 (2006) 931-939
31. Bergman S., Feldman L.S., and Barkun J.S. Evaluating surgical outcomes. Surg Clin N Am 86 (2006) 129-149