Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 432-441

  Studenka, Breanna E ^a   Zelaznik, Howard N ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interval timing; Motor control; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952592386     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Synchronizing actions with events - The role of sensory information. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:305-317.
2. Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. Journal of Motor Behavior 1997, 29:35-46.
3. Billon M., Semjen A. The timing effects of accent production in synchronization and continuation tasks performed by musicians and nonmusicians. Psychological Research 1995, 58:206-217.
4. Collins D.F., Refshauge K.M., Todd G., Gandevia S.C. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94:1699-1706.
5. Delignières D., Lemoine L., Torre K. Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion. Human Movement Science 2004, 23:87-103.
6. Elliott M.T., Welchman A.E., Wing A.M. Being discrete helps keep to the beat. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:731-737.
7. Fink P.W., Foo P., Jirsa V.K., Kelso J.A.S. Local and global stabilization of coordination by sensory information. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:9-20.
8. Hary D., Moore G.P. Temporal tracking and synchronization strategies. Human Neurobiology 1985, 4:73-77.
9. Hary D., Moore G.P. Synchronizing human movement with an external clock source. Biological Cybernetics 1987, 56:305-311.
10. Hary D., Moore G.P. On the performance and stability of human metronome-synchronization strategies. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 1987, 40:109-124.
11. Ivry R., Spencer R.M., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J. The cerebellum and event timing. The Cerebellum: Recent Developments in Cerebellar Research 2002, Vol. 978:302-317. New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
12. Keele S.W., Nicoletti R., Ivry R., Pokorny R.A. Mechanisms of perceptual timing: Beat-based or interval-based judgments?. Psychological Research 1989, 50:251-256.
13. Kelso J.A., Fink P.W., DeLaplain C.R., Carson R.G. Haptic information stabilizes and destabilizes coordination dynamics. Proceeding of the Royal Society London B 2001, 268:1207-1213.
14. Large E.W. On synchronizing movements to music. Human Movement Science 2000, 19:527-566.
15. Large E.W., Palmer C. Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science 2002, 26:1-37.
16. Marsh K.L., Richardson M.J., Schmidt R.C. Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics In Cognitive Science 2009, 1:320-339.
17. Pashler H. Perception and production of brief duration: beat-based versus interval-based timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:485-493.
18. Proske U., Schaible H.G., Schmidt R.F. Joint receptors and kinaesthesia. Experimental Brain Research 1988, 72:219-224.
19. Repp B.H. Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung 2000, 63:106-128.
20. Repp B.H. Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:600-621.
21. Repp B.H. Processes underlying adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization. Human Movement Science 2001, 20:277-312.
22. Repp B.H. Automaticity and voluntary control of phase correction following event onset shifts in sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:410-430.
23. Repp B.H. Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:969-992.
24. Repp B.H. Multiple temporal references in sensorimotor synchronization with metrical auditory sequences. Psychological Research 2008, 72:79-98.
25. Repp B.H. Perfect phase correction in sychronization with slow auditory sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior 2008, 40:363-367.
26. Repp B.H., Steinman S.R. Simultaneous event-based and emergent timing: Synchronization, continuation, and phase correction. Journal of Motor Behavior 2010, 42:111-126.
27. Richardson M.J., Marsh K.L., Isenhower R.W., Goodman J.R.L., Schmidt R.C. Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science 2007, 26:867-891.
28. Robertson S., Zelaznik H., Lantero D., Gadacz K., Spencer R., Doffin J., et al. Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1999, 25:1316-1330.
29. Schulze H.H. The detectability of local and global displacements in regular rhythmic patterns. Psychological Research 1978, 40:173-181.
30. Spencer R.M.C., Ivry R.B. Comparison of patients with Parkinson's disease or cerebellar lesions on continuous and discontinuous timing tasks. Brain and Cognition 2005, 58:84-93.
31. Spencer R.M.C., Zelaznik H.N. Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:371-382.
32. Spencer R.M.C., Zelaznik H.N., Diedrichsen J., Ivry R.B. Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science 2003, 300:1437-1439.
33. Studenka B.E., Zelaznik H.N. The influence of dominant versus non-dominant hand on event and emergent motor timing. Human Movement Science 2008, 27:29-53.
34. Studenka, B. E., & Zelaznik, H. N. (in press). Circle drawing does not exhibit auditory-motor synchronization. Journal of Motor Behavior. (Manuscript ID. 35-10-082-RA.R2).
35. Teulings H.L., Contreras-Vidal J.L., Stelmach G.E., Adler C.H. Parkinsonism reduces coordination of fingers, wrist, and arm in fine motor control. Experimental Neurology 1997, 146:159-170.
36. Torre K., Balasubramaniam R. Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization in continuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 199:157-166.
37. Torre K., Balasubramaniam R., Delignières D. Oscillating in synchrony with a metronome: Serial dependence, limit cycle dynamics, and modeling. Motor Control 2010, 14:323-343.
38. Vorberg D., Wing A. Modeling variability and dependence in timing. Motor Skills (pp) 1996, 2:181-262. Academic Press, New York. H. Heuer, S.W. Keele (Eds.).
39. Zelaznik H.N., Lantero D. The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing. Acta Psychologica 1996, 92:105-118.
40. Zelaznik H.N., Spencer R.M., Doffin J.G. Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: Further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000, 32:193-199.
41. Zelaznik H.N., Spencer R.M.C., Ivry R.B. Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:575-588.
42. Zelaznik H.N., Spencer R.M.C., Ivry R.B., Baria A., Bloom M., Dolansky L., et al. Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: Probing the relationship between event and emergent timing. Journal of Motor Behavior 2005, 37:395-403.