The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 105-118

  Zelaznik, Howard N ^a   Lantero, Dawn ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuous tasks; Motor control; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; STEREOTYPY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; ORIENTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0030163909     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00007-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Elliott, D., R. Calvert, J. Jaeger and R. Jones, 1990. A visual representation and the control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 22, 327-346.
2. Franz, E.A., H.N. Zelaznik and G. McCabe, 1991. Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica 77, 137-151.
3. Franz, E.A., H.N. Zelaznik and Smith, 1992. Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial and speech movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 24, 281-287.
4. Hancock, P.A. and K.M. Newell, 1985. 'The movement speed-accuracy relationship in space-time'. In: H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck and H.H. Schmidt (eds.), Motor behavior: Programming, control and acquisition (pp. 153-188). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Jeannerod, M., 1988. The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Keele, S.W. and R.I. Ivry, 1987. 'Modular analysis of timing in motor skill'. In: G.H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 21 (pp. 183-228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Keele, S.W., R.I. Ivry and R. Pokorny, 1987. Force control and its relation to timing. Journal of Motor Behavior 19, 96-114.
8. Lee, D.N., J.R. Lishman and J.A. Thomson, 1982. Regulation of gait in long jumping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8, 448-459.
9. Lukashin, A.V. and A.P. Georgopoulos, 1993. A dynamical neural network model of motor cortical activity during movement: Population coding of movement trajectories. Biological Cybernetics 69, 517-524.
10. Newell, K.M., 1985. 'Coordination, control and skill'. In: I. Franks and R. Wilberg (eds.), Differing perspectives in motor control (pp. 295-318). Amsterdam: North Holland.
11. Schmidt, R.A., 1975. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82, 225-260.
12. Schmidt, R.A., 1988. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL.: Human Kinetics.
13. Stelmach, G.E. and J. Requin (eds.), 1992. Tutorials in motor behavior II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. Teasdale, N., R. Forget, C. Bard, J. Paillard, M. Fleury and Y. Lamarre, 1993. The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks. Acta Psychologica 82, 179-191.
15. Van Galen, G.P. and H.L. Teulings, 1983. The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting. Acta Psychologica 54, 9-22.
16. Van Galen, G.P., H.L. Teulings and J. Sanders, 1994. 'On the interdependence of motor programming and feedback processing in handwriting'. In: C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lorette and A. Vinter (eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 403-419). Paris: Europie.
17. Turvey, M.T., 1977. 'Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision'. In: R.E. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 211-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Wright, C.E., 1990. 'Generalized motor programs: Reexamining claims of effector independence'. In: M. Jeannerod (ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 294-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Zelaznik, H.N., B. Hawkins and L.G. Kisselburgh, 1983. Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 15, 217-236.