Responses of periodontal ligament stem cells on various titanium surfaces

Oral Diseases

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 320-327

  Heo, Y Y ^a   Um, S ^b   Kim, S K ^b   Park, J M ^c   Seo, B M ^b  

^a WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Ewha Womans University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Osteocalcin; Periodontal ligament stem cell; Titanium surface

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ADULT STEM CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL PROLIFERATION; COLLAGEN TYPE I; DENTAL ETCHING; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASES; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LIGHT; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; PARTICLE SIZE; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; STEM CELLS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 79952576626     PISSN: 1354523X     EISSN: 16010825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01728.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bellows CG, Reimers SM, Heersche JN (1999). Expression of mRNAs for type-I collagen, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, and osteopontin at different stages of osteoblastic differentiation and their regulation by 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cell Tissue Res 297: 249-259.
2. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM (1992). Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7: 302-310.
3. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al (1977). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16: 1-132.
4. Byon ES, Hyun YT, Jeon SJ, Jeong YS (2008). MG-63 cell response on the Mg ion implanted titanium. Biomater Res 12: 148-153.
5. Choi JW, Heo SJ, Koak JY et al (2006). Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. J Oral Rehabil 33: 889-897.
6. Cochran DL, Simpson J, Waber HP, Buser D (1994). Attachment and growth of periodontal cells on smooth and rough titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9: 289-297.
7. Davies JE (2003). Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 67: 932-949.
8. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ (2003). A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18: 349-356.
9. Kim Y, Jang JH, Ku Y et al (2004). Microarray-based expression analysis of human osteoblast-like cell response to anodized titanium surface. Biotechnol Lett 26: 399-402.
10. Kim MJ, Kim CW, Lim YJ, Heo SJ (2006). Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 79: 1023-1032.
11. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO et al (1996). Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 17: 605-616.
12. Li Y, Lee IS, Cui FZ, Choi SH (2008). The biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials 29: 2025-2032.
13. Matsuzaka K, Yoshinari M, Shimono M, Inoue T (2004). Effects of multigrooved surfaces on osteoblast-like cells in vitro: scanning electron microscopic observation and mRNA expression of osteopontin and osteocalcin. J Biomed Mater Res A 68: 227-234.
14. Na Y, Heo SJ, Kim SK, Koak JY (2009). Implant surface treatments affect gene expression of Runx2, osteogenic key marker. J Adv Prosthodont 1: 91-96.
15. Neupane MP, Park IS, Lee MH, Bae TS, Watari F (2009). Influence of heat treatment on morphological changes of nano-structured titanium oxide formed by anodic oxidation of titanium in acidic fluoride solution. Biomed Mater Eng 19: 77-83.
16. Ogawa T, Nishimura I (2003). Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18: 200-210.
17. Park KH, Heo SJ, Koak JY et al (2007a). Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study. J Oral Rehabil 34: 517-527.
18. Park IS, Lee MH, Bae TS, Seol KW (2007b). Effects of anodic oxidation parameters on a modified titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 84: 422-429.
19. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA et al (2008). Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451: 141-146.
20. Roh HK, Heo SJ, Chang IT et al (2003). Response of osteoblast-like cells on titanium surface treatment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 41: 699-713.
21. Seo BM, Miura M, Gronthos S et al (2004). Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet 364: 149-155.
22. Shi S, Bartold PM, Miura M, Seo BM, Robey PG, Gronthos S (2005). The efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells to regenerate and repair dental structures. Orthod Craniofac Res 8: 191-199.
23. Thomas KA, Cook SD (1985). An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 19: 875-901.