-
1
-
-
70249085135
-
-
Rae 2008. Quality profiles. www.rae.ac.uk/Results/.
-
(2008)
Quality Profiles
-
-
-
4
-
-
77954355807
-
-
Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England: a consultancy study within the Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding. Evidence
-
Adams J, Cook N, Law G, Marshall S, Mount D, Smith D, et al. The role of selectivity and the characteristics of excellence. Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England: a consultancy study within the Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding. Evidence; 2000.
-
(2000)
The Role of Selectivity and the Characteristics of Excellence
-
-
Adams, J.1
Cook, N.2
Law, G.3
Marshall, S.4
Mount, D.5
Smith, D.6
-
6
-
-
0037460788
-
Is primary-care research a lost cause?
-
Anon
-
Anon. Is primary-care research a lost cause? Lancet 2003;361:9362:977.
-
(2003)
Lancet
, vol.361
, Issue.9362
, pp. 977
-
-
-
7
-
-
40649090709
-
-
Higher Education Funding Council for England. Research excellence framework. 2010. www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/.
-
(2010)
Research Excellence Framework
-
-
-
11
-
-
84881312613
-
-
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.OECD
-
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.OECD. StatExtracts [database online]. 2007. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?usercontext= sourceoecd.
-
(2007)
StatExtracts [Database Online]
-
-
-
14
-
-
11944258347
-
Research outputs in respiratory medicine
-
DOI 10.1136/thx.2004.031229
-
Rippon I, Lewison G, Partridge MR. Research outputs in respiratory medicine. Thorax 2005;60:63-7. (Pubitemid 40101021)
-
(2005)
Thorax
, vol.60
, Issue.1
, pp. 63-67
-
-
Rippon, I.1
Lewison, G.2
Partridge, M.R.3
-
15
-
-
68149156387
-
Assessing the impact of biomedical research of institutions of differing sizes
-
Sypsa V, Hatzakis A. Assessing the impact of biomedical research of institutions of differing sizes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:33.
-
(2009)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.9
, pp. 33
-
-
Sypsa, V.1
Hatzakis, A.2
-
17
-
-
0031049280
-
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
-
Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:497.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 497
-
-
Seglen, P.O.1
-
18
-
-
33750218919
-
The power of the unrelenting impact factor - Is it a force for good or harm?
-
Smith R. The power of the unrelenting impact factor - Is it a force for good or harm? Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:1129-30.
-
(2006)
Int J Epidemiol
, vol.35
, pp. 1129-1130
-
-
Smith, R.1
-
19
-
-
33744797104
-
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
-
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010, PII S0895435605004117
-
Buscemi N, Hartling L. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:697-703. (Pubitemid 43833493)
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.59
, Issue.7
, pp. 697-703
-
-
Buscemi, N.1
Hartling, L.2
Vandermeer, B.3
Tjosvold, L.4
Klassen, T.P.5
-
20
-
-
84881315973
-
-
National Science Board. National Science Board
-
National Science Board. Digest of key science and engineering indicators 2008. National Science Board. www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest08/pages/figure10. htm.
-
Digest of Key Science and Engineering Indicators 2008
-
-
|