메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 342, Issue 7797, 2011, Pages 588-

Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Bibliometric analysis

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIBLIOMETRICS; CANADA; CITATION ANALYSIS; GERMANY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NETHERLANDS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79952526877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d1028     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (122)

References (22)
  • 1
    • 70249085135 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rae 2008. Quality profiles. www.rae.ac.uk/Results/.
    • (2008) Quality Profiles
  • 6
    • 0037460788 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is primary-care research a lost cause?
    • Anon
    • Anon. Is primary-care research a lost cause? Lancet 2003;361:9362:977.
    • (2003) Lancet , vol.361 , Issue.9362 , pp. 977
  • 7
    • 40649090709 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Higher Education Funding Council for England. Research excellence framework. 2010. www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/.
    • (2010) Research Excellence Framework
  • 11
    • 84881312613 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.OECD
    • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.OECD. StatExtracts [database online]. 2007. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?usercontext= sourceoecd.
    • (2007) StatExtracts [Database Online]
  • 14
    • 11944258347 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research outputs in respiratory medicine
    • DOI 10.1136/thx.2004.031229
    • Rippon I, Lewison G, Partridge MR. Research outputs in respiratory medicine. Thorax 2005;60:63-7. (Pubitemid 40101021)
    • (2005) Thorax , vol.60 , Issue.1 , pp. 63-67
    • Rippon, I.1    Lewison, G.2    Partridge, M.R.3
  • 15
    • 68149156387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the impact of biomedical research of institutions of differing sizes
    • Sypsa V, Hatzakis A. Assessing the impact of biomedical research of institutions of differing sizes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:33.
    • (2009) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.9 , pp. 33
    • Sypsa, V.1    Hatzakis, A.2
  • 17
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:497.
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 497
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 18
    • 33750218919 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The power of the unrelenting impact factor - Is it a force for good or harm?
    • Smith R. The power of the unrelenting impact factor - Is it a force for good or harm? Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:1129-30.
    • (2006) Int J Epidemiol , vol.35 , pp. 1129-1130
    • Smith, R.1
  • 19
    • 33744797104 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
    • DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010, PII S0895435605004117
    • Buscemi N, Hartling L. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:697-703. (Pubitemid 43833493)
    • (2006) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol.59 , Issue.7 , pp. 697-703
    • Buscemi, N.1    Hartling, L.2    Vandermeer, B.3    Tjosvold, L.4    Klassen, T.P.5
  • 20
    • 84881315973 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Science Board. National Science Board
    • National Science Board. Digest of key science and engineering indicators 2008. National Science Board. www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest08/pages/figure10. htm.
    • Digest of Key Science and Engineering Indicators 2008


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.