Rising Asian Powers and Changing Global Governance

International Studies Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 24-33

  Florini, Ann ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; MILITARY GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL POWER;

CHINA; INDIA;

EID: 79952474932     PISSN: 15219488     EISSN: 14682486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00995.x     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Alagappa, Muthiah,. (2009) Report of the Workshop on International Studies in India. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.
2. Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and, Susan Sell, (eds) (2010) Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bajpai, Kanti,. (1997) International Studies in India: Bringing Theory (Back) Home. In International and Area Studies in India, edited by, M. S. Rajan,. New Delhi: Lancer Books 31-51.
4. Barnett, Michael, and, Martha Finnemore,. (2004) Rules for the World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
5. Biermann, Frank, Philipp Pattberg, and, Harro Van Asselt,. (2009) The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9: 14-40.
6. Bremmer, Ian,. (2010) The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War between States and Corporations? Portfolio/Penguin.
7. Buthe, Tim,. (2003) Governance through Private Authority?: Non-state Actors in World Politics. Journal of International Affairs 57 (1): 245.
8. Culter, Claire, Virginia Haufler, and, Tony Porter, (eds) (1999) Private Authority in International Affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.
9. Deudney, Daniel, and, G. John Ikenberry,. (1999) The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25: 179-196.
10. Finnemore, Martha,. (1996) National Interests in International Society. New York: Cornell University Press.
11. Florini, Ann, (ed.) (2000) The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Tokyo and Washington, DC: The Japan Center for International Exchange and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
12. Florini, Ann,. (2005) The Coming Democracy: New Rules for Running a New World. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
13. Hall, Rodney Bruce, and, Thomas Biersteker,. (2002) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hu, Jintao,. (2010) U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue Opening Session. Available at (Accessed June 16, 2010).
15. Ikenberry, G. John,. (2009) Liberalism in a Realist World: International Relations as an American Scholarly Tradition. International Studies 46 (1-2): 203-219.
16. Jayasuriya, Kanishka,. (2005) Reconstituting the Global Liberal Order: Legitimacy, Regulation and Security. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
17. Jervis, Robert,. (1978) Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2): 167-214.
18. Johnston, Alastair Iain,. (2007) Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980-2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Keohane, Robert,. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Keohane, Robert O,. (1990) International Liberalism Reconsidered. In Economic Limits to Modern Politics, edited by, John Dunn,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Krasner, Stephen D,. (1983) International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Lake, David,. (2007) Escape from the State of Nature: Anarchy and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security 32 (1): 47-79.
23. Lake, David A,. (2010) Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance. New Orleans, Louisiana: ISA Presidential Address.
24. Mearsheimer, John J,. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: Norton.
25. Mehta, Pratap Bhanu,. (2009) "Forward" in Muthiah Alagappa, Report of the Workshop on International Studies in India. Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, p. 9.
26. Ostrom, Elinor,. (2010) A Long Polycentric Journey. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 1-23.
27. Qin, Yaqing,. (2007) Why is there No Chinese International Relations Theory? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (3): 313-340.
28. Qin, Yaqing,. (2009) Towards a Chinese School of Thought: Development of International Relations Theory in China. International Studies 46 (1-2), 185-201.
29. Risse, Thomas,. (1995) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Ruggie, John Gerard,. (1998) What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge International Organization 52 (4): 855.
31. Simmons, P.J., and, C. De Jonge Oudraat, (eds) (2001) Managing Global Issues, Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
32. Slaughter, Anne-Marie,. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Waltz, Kenneth,. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill.
34. Weiss, Thomas G., and, Ramesh Thakur,. (2010) Global Governance and the United Nation: An Unfinished Journey. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35. Wendt, Alexander,. (1992) Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391-425.
36. Young, Oran, W. Bradnee Chambers, Joy A. Kim, and, Claudia Ten Have, (eds) (2008) Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.