Conventional and digital radiography in vertical root fracture diagnosis: A comparison study

Dental Traumatology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-146

  Tofangchiha, Maryam ^a   Bakhshi, Mahin ^b   Fakhar, Hoorieh Bashizadeh ^c   Panjnoush, Mehrdad ^c  

^a QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; TIME; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 79952458507     PISSN: 16004469     EISSN: 16009657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00973.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dalla Palma L, Grisi G, Cuttin R, Rimondini A. Digital versus conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1682-92.
2. Colin C, Vergnon P, Guibaud L, Borson O, Pinaudeau D, Perret Du Cray MH et al. Comparative assessment of digital and analog radiography: diagnostic accuracy, cost analysis and quality of care. Eur J Radiol 1998;26:226-34.
3. Hurber JS, Carr RF. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:401-4.
4. Lai KW, Langlois SL. A comparative study of a digital radiography system. Australas Radiol 1999;43:197-200.
5. Wenzel A. Current trends in radiographic caries imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995;80:527-37.
6. Mistak EJ, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, West LA, Runyan DA. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital and telephonically transmitted radiographic images. J Endod 1998;24:262-6.
7. Stassinakis A, Zeyer O, Bragger U. The diagnosis of bone lesions with conventional x-ray images and with a direct digital procedure (RVG). An in-vitro study. RadioVisioGraphy. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:1539-45.
8. Hedrick RT, Dove SB, Peters DD, McDavid WD. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. J Endod 1994;20:320-6.
9. Kullendorff B, Petersson K, Rohlin M. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:183-9.
10. Chong MJ, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Cheng E, Wan V. Visual- tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and diagnodent in diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:341-9.
11. Uprichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schafer TE, Adair S, Weller RN. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:9-15.
12. Hintze H. Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children. Caries Res 1993;27:499-504.
13. Kaeppler G, Vogel A, Axmann-Krcmar D. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:362-7.
14. Lozano A, Forner L, Liena C. In vitro comparison of root canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology. Int Endod J 2002;35:542-5.
15. Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. J Endod 1999;25:260-3.
16. Roobottom CA, Weston MJ. The detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue comparison of conventional and digital radiography. Clin Radiol 1994;49:330-2.
17. Kositbowornchai S, Nuansakul R, Sikram S, Sinahawttana S, Saengmontri S. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:106-9.
18. Kositbowornchai S, Sikram S, Nuansakul R, Thinkhamrop B. Root fracture detection on digital images: effect of the zoom function. Dent Traumatol 2003;19:154-9.
19. Youssefzadeh S, Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental vertical root fractures: value of CT in detection. Radiology 1999;210:545-9.
20. Langen HJ, Klein HM, Wein B, Stargardt A, Gunther RW. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls. Invest Radiol 1993;28:686-9.
21. Langen HJ, Klein HM, Wein B, Schiwy-Bochat KH, Stargardt A, Gunther RW. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography for the detection of a skull fracture under varying exposure parameters. Invest Radiol 1993;28:231-4.
22. Monagham P, Bajalcaliev JG, Kaminski EJ, Lautenschlanger EP. A method for producing experimental simple vertical root fractures in dog teeth. J Endod 1993;19:512-5.
23. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Textbook oral radiology principles and interpretation, 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.