Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 401-404

  Hubar, J S ^a   Carr, R F ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed dental radiography; Digital radiology; Forensic odontology; Forensic science

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0033027163     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs14473j     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Devore D. Radiology and photography in forensic dentistry. Dent Clin N Amer 1977;21:69-83.
2. Mertz C. Dental identification. Dent Clin N Amer 1977;21:47-67.
3. Sainio P, Syrjanen SM, Komakow S. Positive identification of victims by comparison of ante-mortem and post-mortem dental radiographs. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 1990;8:11-6.
4. Anderson L, Wenzel A. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography. Forensic Sci Int 1995;72(1):55-64.
5. Borrman H, Grondahl H. Accuracy in establishing identity by means of intraoral radiographs. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 1990; 8:31-6.
6. Bernstein M. The identification of John Doe. J Amer Dent Assoc 1985;110:918-21.
7. Goldstein M, Sweet DJ, Wood RE. A specimen positioning device for dental radiographic identification-image geometry considerations. J Forensic Sci 1998;43(1):185-9.
8. Reis, T. Dental radiology equipment and procedures in general and specialized practices: survey report. Dental Products Report 1997; Oct:17-22.