Self-organization of muscle cell structure and function

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Grosberg, Anna ^a   Kuo, Po Ling ^a   Guo, Chin Lin ^a   Geisse, Nicholas A ^a   Bray, Mark Anthony ^a   Adams, William J ^a   Sheehy, Sean P ^a   Parker, Kevin Kit ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CELLS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEEDBACK; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

CELL FUNCTIONS; CELL STRUCTURE; COUPLING PROBLEM; CYTOSKELETAL; CYTOSKELETONS; FUNCTIONAL ADAPTATION; LENGTH SCALE; MULTISCALE COUPLING; MUSCLE CELL; SELF ORGANIZATIONS;

MUSCLE;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL POLARITY; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FOCAL ADHESION; HEART MUSCLE CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MUSCLE CELL; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; MUSCLE FIBRIL; MUSCLE FUNCTION; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SARCOMERE LENGTH; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SARCOMERE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

RATTUS;

ACTIN;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOSKELETON; FOCAL ADHESIONS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; MYOFIBRILS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SARCOMERES;

EID: 79952456280     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001088     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dabiri GA, Turnacioglu KK, Sanger JM, Sanger JW, (1997) Myofibrillogenesis visualized in living embryonic cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9493-9498.
2. Sanger JW, Kang SM, Siebrands CC, Freeman N, Du AP, et al. (2005) How to build a myofibril. J Muscle Res Cell M 26: 343-354.
3. Moerman D, Williams B, (2006) Sarcomere assembly in C. elegans muscle. pp. 1-16 WormBook: Available:http://www.wormbook.org.
4. Holtzer H, Hijikata T, Lin ZX, Zhang ZQ, Holtzer S, et al. (1997) Independent assembly of 1.6 mu m long bipolar MHC filaments and I-Z-I bodies. Cell Struct Funct 22: 83-93.
5. Russell B, Motlagh D, Ashley WW, (2000) Form follows function: how muscle shape is regulated by work. J Appl Physiol 88: 1127-1132.
6. Schaper J, Froede R, Sthein, Buck A, Hashizume H, et al. (1991) Impairment of the myocardial ultrastructure and changes of the cytoskeleton in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 83: 504-514.
7. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bonnetnann CG, Sweeney HL, et al. (2004) Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 166: 877-887.
8. Quach NL, Rando TA, (2006) Focal adhesion kinase is essential for costamerogenesis in cultured skeletal muscle cells. Dev Biol 293: 38-52.
9. Ramachandran I, Terry M, Ferrari MB, (2003) Skeletal muscle myosin cross-bridge cycling is necessary for myofibrillogenesis. Cell Motil Cytoskel 55: 61-72.
10. Wang N, Ostuni E, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE, (2002) Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. Cell Motil Cytoskel 52: 97-106.
11. Parker KK, Brock AL, Brangwynne C, Mannix RJ, Wang N, et al. (2002) Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. Faseb J 16: 10.
12. Thery M, Pepin A, Dressaire E, Chen Y, Bornens M, (2006) Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil Cytoskel 63: 341-355.
13. Rhee D, Sanger JM, Sanger JW, (1994) The Premyofibril- Evidence for its role in myofibrillogenesis. Cell Motil Cytoskel 28: 1-24.
14. Deshpande VS, McMeeking RM, Evans AG, (2006) A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17065-17065.
15. Deshpande VS, Mrksich M, McMeeking RM, Evans AG, (2008) A bio-mechanical model for coupling cell contractility with focal adhesion formation. J Mech Phys Solids 56: 1484-1510.
16. Novak IL, Slepchenko BM, Mogilner A, Loew LM, (2004) Cooperativity between cell contractility and adhesion. Phys Rev Lett 93: 268109.
17. Geisse NA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK, (2009) Control of myocyte remodeling in vitro with engineered substrates. In Vitro Cell Dev-An 45: 343-350.
18. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K, (1996) Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 133: 1403-1415.
19. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP, (2002) The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 159: 695-705.
20. Burridge K, ChrzanowskaWodnicka M, (1996) Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12: 463-518.
21. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, et al. (2001) Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 3: 466-472.
22. McKenna NM, Wang YL, (1986) Possible Translocation of Actin and Alpha-Actinin Along Stress Fibers. Exp Cell Res 167: 95-105.
23. Hotulainen P, Lappalainen P, (2006) Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J Cell Biol 173: 383-394.
24. Verkhovsky AB, Svitkina TM, Borisy GG, (1995) Myosin-II filament assemblies in the active lamella of fibroblasts- their morphogenesis and role in the formation of actin filament bundles. J Cell Biol 131: 989-1002.
25. Borukhov I, Bruinsma RF, Gelbart WM, Liu AJ, (2005) Structural polymorphism of the cytoskeleton: A model of linker-assisted filament aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 3673-3678.
26. Parker KK, Tan J, Chen CS, Tung L, (2008) Myofibrillar architecture in engineered cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 103: 340-342.
27. Bray MA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK, (2008) Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape. Cell Motil Cytoskel 65: 641-651.
28. Bray M-AP, Adams WJ, Geisse NA, Feinberg AW, Sheehy SP, et al. (2010) Nuclear morphology and deformation in engineered cardiac myocytes and tissues. Biomaterials 31: 5143-5150.
29. Paszek MJ, Boettiger D, Weaver VM, Hammer DA, (2009) Integrin clustering is driven by mechanical resistance from the glycocalyx and the substrate. PLoS Comput Biol 5.
30. Kroon W, Delhaas T, Bovendeerd P, Arts T, (2009) Computational analysis of the myocardial structure: Adaptation of cardiac myofiber orientations through deformation. Med Image Anal 13: 346-353.
31. Thery M, Jimenez-Dalmaroni A, Racine V, Bornens M, Julicher F, (2007) Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 447: 493-U496.
32. Weber KL, Fischer RS, Fowler VM, (2007) Tmod3 regulates polarized epithelial cell morphology. J Cell Sci 120: 3625-3632.
33. Love AEH, (1927) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity Cambridge Cambridge Eng. University Press.
34. Umeno A, Ueno S, (2003) Quantitative analysis of adherent cell orientation influenced by strong magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2: 26-28.
35. Tan JL, Liu W, Nelson CM, Raghavan S, Chen CS, (2004) Simple approach to micropattern cells on common culture substrates by tuning substrate wettability. Tissue Eng 10: 865-872.
36. Pelham RJ, Wang YL, (1997) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13661-13665.
37. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, et al. (2004) Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 86: 617-628.
38. Butler JP, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Fabry B, Fredberg JJ, (2002) Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am J Physiol-Cell Ph 282: C595-C605.
39. Dembo M, Wang YL, (1999) Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys J 76: 2307-2316.
40. Schwarz US, Balaban NQ, Riveline D, Bershadsky A, Geiger B, et al. (2002) Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: The effect of localized force and the need for regularization. Biophys J 83: 1380-1394.