A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement

Construction Management and Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 145-162

  Yang, Jing ^a   Shen, Ping Qi ^b   Bourne, Lynda ^c   Ho, Christabel Man Fong ^b   Xue, Xiaolong ^d  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c Stakeholder Management Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^d HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Contingency; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; AUSTRALIA; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; CONTINGENCY; HONG-KONG; MAIN TASKS; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; SURVEYS;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ACTION RESEARCH; CONTINGENT VALUATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; STAKEHOLDER;

AUSTRALIA; CHINA; HONG KONG;

EID: 79952431244     PISSN: 01446193     EISSN: 1466433X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2010.521759     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akintoye, A. (2000) Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 77-89.
2. Ballejos, L.C. and Montagna, J.M. (2008) Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments. Requirements Engineering, 13, 281-97.
3. Bourne, L. (2005) Project relationship management and the Stakeholder CircleTM, PhD thesis, RMIT University, Australia.
4. Bourne, L. (2008) Stakeholder relationship management maturity, in PMI Global Congress Proceedings, Session ADV06, St. Julians, Malta 18-21 October.
5. Bourne, L. and Walker, D.H.T. (2006) Visualizing stakeholder influence-two Australian examples. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5-22.
6. Bourne, L. and Walker, D.H.T. (2005) Visualizing and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-60.
7. Chess, C. and Purcell, K. (1999) Public participation and the environment-do we know what works? Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 2685-92.
8. Chinyio, E.A. and Akintoye, A. (2008) Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 591-9.
9. Cleland, D.I. (1986) Project stakeholder management. Project Management Journal, 17(4), 36-44.
10. Cross, R. and Parker, A. (2004) The Hidden Power of Social Networks, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
11. Cyram (2009) NetMiner 3.4.0., Cyram, Seoul.
12. Dawson, S., Madnerson, L. and Tallo, V.L. (1993) A Manual for the Use of Focus Groups, International Nutrition Foundation for Developing Countries (INFDC), Boston, MA.
13. De Lopez, T.T. (2001) Stakeholder management for conservation projects: a case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia. Environmental Management, 28(1), 47-60.
14. Elias, A.A., Cavana, R.Y. and Jackson, L.S. (2002) Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, 34(2), 301-10.
15. Foster, D. and Jonker, J. (2005) Stakeholder relationships: the dialogue of engagement. Corporate Governance, 5(5), 51-7.
16. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Inc., Boston.
17. Greenwood, M. (2007) Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315-27.
18. Hartmann, F.T. (2002) The role of trust in project management, in Slevin, D.P., Cleland, D.I. and Pinto, J.K. (eds) The Frontiers of Project Management Research, PMI, Newtown Square, PA, pp. 225-35.
19. Jepsen, A.L. and Eskerod, P. (2008) Stakeholder analysis in projects: challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 4(2), 1-9.
20. Jergeas, G.F., Williamson, E., Skulmoski, G.J. and Thomas, J.L. (2000) Stakeholder management on construction projects. AACE International Transactions, 12, 1-5.
21. Karlsen, J.T., Græe, K. and Massaoud, M.J. (2008) Building trust in project-stakeholder relationships. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 7-22.
22. Katz, L. (1953) A new status index derived from sociometric data analysis. Psychometrika, 18, 34-43.
23. Mitchell, J.C. (1969) The concept and use of social networks, in Mitchell, J.C. (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 1-50.
24. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-87.
25. Newcombe, R. (2003) From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 22(9-10), 762-84.
26. Olander, S. (2006) External stakeholder management, PhD thesis, Lund University.
27. Olander, S. (2007) Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3), 277-87.
28. Olander, S. and Landin, A. (2005) Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-8.
29. Olander, S. and Landin, A. (2008) A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 553-61.
30. Parise, S. (2007) Knowledge management and human resources development: an application in social network analysis methods. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(3), 359-83.
31. Patton, M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
32. PMI (1996) Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.
33. PMI (2008) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th edn, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.
34. Pretty, J.N. (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23, 1247-63.
35. Pryke, S.D. (2006) Projects as networks of relationships, in Pryke, S. and Smyth, H. (eds) The Management of Complex Projects: A Relationship Approach, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 213-35.
36. Reed, M.S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-31.
37. Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C.H. and Stringer, L.C. (2009) Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933-49.
38. Richards, C., Blackstock, K.L. and Carter, C.E. (2004) Practical approaches to participation. SERG Policy Brief, No. 1, Macauley Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen.
39. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation in science. Technology and Human Values, 25, 3-29.
40. Rowley, T.J. (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
41. Varvasovszky, Z. and Brugha, R. (2000) A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-45.
42. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (2005) Effective Engagement: Building Relationships with Community and Other Stakeholders, The Community Engagement Network, Resource and Regional Services Division, Melbourne.
43. Walker, D.H.T., Bourne, L.M. and Rowlinson, S. (2008) Stakeholders and the supply chain, in Walker, D.H.T. and Rowlinson, S. (eds) Procurement Systems: A Crossindustry Project Management Perspective, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 70-100.
44. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
45. Winch, G. and Bonke, S. (2002) Project stakeholder mapping: analysing the interests of project stakeholders, in Slevin, D.P., Cleland, D.I. and Pinto, J.K. (eds) Frontiers of Project Management Research, PMI, Newtown Square, PA, pp. 385-402.
46. Young, T.L. (2006) Successful Project Management, 2nd edn, Kogan Page, London.