University and innovation systems: The case of India

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 7-17

  Datta, Surja ^a   Saad, Mohammed ^b  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHER EDUCATION; INNOVATION;

INDIA;

EID: 79952380176     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X12834251302526     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bush, Vannevar 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. Available at .
2. Dahiya, B S 2001. The University Autonomy in India: The Idea and the Reality. Shimla, India: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
3. Datta, S and M Saad 2008. Social capital and university- industry-government networks in offshore outsourcing - the case of India. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 741-754.
4. Etzkowitz, H 2003. Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
5. Etzkowitz, H and J Dzisah 2008. Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 653-666.
6. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff 2000. The dynamics of innovation: form national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university- industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
7. Freeman, C 1995. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
8. Freeman, C 2002. Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems - complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191-211.
9. Furman, J L, M E Porter and S Stern 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
10. Hunter, W W 1883. Report of the Indian Education Commission. Calcutta: Government of India.
11. Kanhere, D G, M Arjunwadkar and A M Vichare 2009. Rise and decline of India's state university system: neglect, design or neglect by design? Current Science, 97(7), 1013-1021.
12. Kenny, M and U von Burg 1999. Technology entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 67-103.
13. Kline, S and N Rosenberg 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, R Landau and N Rosenberg, eds., pp 275-306. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
14. List, F 1856. National System of Political Economy. Philadelphia, PA: J B Lippincott & Co.
15. Lundvall, B ed., 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
16. Mowery, D C and B N Sampat 2005. Universities in National Innovation Systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J Fagerberg, D C Mowery and R R Nelson, eds., pp 209-239. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Nelson, R 1993. The National Innovation System: A Comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Nelson, R R and P M Romer 1996. Science, economic growth, and public policy. Challenge, March/April, 9-21.
19. Porter, M 1998. On Competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
20. Porter, M and S Stern 2002. National innovative capacity. In The Global Competitiveness Report 2001-2002, M Porter and K Schwab, eds., pp 102-118.NewYork: Oxford University Press.
21. Prathap, G and B Gupta 2009. Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999-2008. Current Science, 97(3), 304-306.
22. Romer, P M 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.
23. Sanderson, M 1972. The Universities and British Industry 1850-1970. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24. Schumpeter, J 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Shafaeddin, M 2000. What did Frederick List actually say?: Some clarifications on the infant industry argument, Geneva: UNCTAD. Available at , last accessed 11 April 2010.