Functional study of genes essential for autogamy and nuclear reorganization in Paramecium

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 363-372

  Nowak, Jacek K ^a,b,f   Gromadka, Robert ^b   Juszczuk, Marek ^b   Jerka Dziadosz, Maria ^c   Maliszewska, Kamila ^b   Mucchielli, Marie Hélène ^a,d,e,f   Gout, Jean François ^g   Arnaiz, Olivier ^a,d,f   Agier, Nicolas ^a,d,e,f   Tang, Thomas ^a,f   Aggerbeck, Lawrence P ^a,d,f,h   Cohen, Jean ^a,d,f   Delacroix, Hervé ^a,d,f   Sperling, Linda ^a,d,f   Herbert, Christopher J ^a,d,f   Zagulski, Marek ^b,i   Bétermier, Mireille ^a,d,f  

^a CENTRE DE GÉNÉTIQUE MOLÉCULAIRE   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS   (Poland)

^c NENCKI INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Poland)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^e SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^f CNRS   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^h INSERM   (France)

ⁱ Genomed sp z oo   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTOZOAL PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GERMLINE MICRONUCLEUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MACRONUCLEUS; METABOLISM; PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA; SELF FERTILIZATION;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; MACRONUCLEUS; MICRONUCLEUS, GERMLINE; PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA; PROTOZOAN PROTEINS; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

CILIOPHORA; PARAMECIUM; PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA; PROTISTA;

EID: 79952307773     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00258-10     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arnaiz, O., S. Cain, J. Cohen, and L. Sperling. 2007. ParameciumDB: a community resource that integrates the Paramecium tetraurelia genome sequence with genetic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D439-D444.
2. Arnaiz, O., et al. 2010. Gene expression in a paleopolyploid: a transcriptome resource for the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. BMC Genomics 11: 547.
3. Arnaiz, O., and L. Sperling. 2011. ParameciumDB in 2011: new tools and new data for functional and comparative genomics of the model ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D632-D636.
4. Aronica, L., et al. 2008. Study of an RNA helicase implicates small RNAnoncoding RNA interactions in programmed DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev. 22: 2228-2241.
5. Aury, J. M., et al. 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444: 171-178.
6. Baudry, C., et al. 2009. PiggyMac, a domesticated piggyBac transposase involved in programmed genome rearrangements in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev. 23: 2478-2483.
7. Bednenko, J., et al. 2009. Two GW repeat proteins interact with Tetrahymena thermophila argonaute and promote genome rearrangement. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 5020-5030.
8. Berger, J. D. 1974. Selective autolysis of nuclei as a source of DNA precursors in Paramecium aurelia exconjugants. J. Protozool. 21: 145-152.
9. Bétermier, M. 2004. Large-scale genome remodelling by the developmentally programmed elimination of germ line sequences in the ciliate Paramecium. Res. Microbiol. 155: 399-408.
10. Bouhouche, K., J. F. Gout, A. Kapusta, M. Bétermier, and E. Meyer. Functional specialization of Piwi proteins in Paramecium tetraurelia from posttranscriptional gene silencing to genome remodelling. Nucleic Acids Res., in press.
11. Bourne, Y., et al. 1996. Crystal structure and mutational analysis of the human CDK2 kinase complex with cell cycle-regulatory protein CksHs1. Cell 84: 863-874.
12. Brameier, M., A. Krings, and R. M. MacCallum. 2007. NucPred-predicting nuclear localization of proteins. Bioinformatics 23: 1159-1160.
13. Duharcourt, S., G. Lepere, and E. Meyer. 2009. Developmental genome rearrangements in ciliates: a natural genomic subtraction mediated by noncoding transcripts. Trends Genet. 25: 344-350.
14. Galvani, A., and L. Sperling. 2002. RNA interference by feeding in Paramecium. Trends Genet. 18: 11-12.
15. Gratias, A., and M. Bétermier. 2003. Processing of double-strand breaks is involved in the precise excision of Paramecium IESs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 7152-7162.
16. Heymann, J. A., and J. E. Hinshaw. 2009. Dynamins at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122: 3427-3431.
17. Jahn, C. L., and L. A. Klobutcher. 2002. Genome remodeling in ciliated protozoa. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56: 489-520.
18. Jerka-Dziadosz, M. 1985. Mirror-image configuration of the cortical pattern causes modifications in propagation of microtubular structures in the hypotrich ciliate Paraurostyla weissei. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 194: 311-324.
19. Jerka-Dziadosz, M., et al. 1995. Cellular polarity in ciliates: persistence of global polarity in a disorganized mutant of Tetrahymena thermophila that disrupts cytoskeletal organization. Dev. Biol. 169: 644-661.
20. Kolas, N. K., et al. 2005. Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I. J. Cell Biol. 171: 447-458.
21. Le Mouël, A., A. Butler, F. Caron, and E. Meyer. 2003. Developmentally regulated chromosome fragmentation linked to imprecise elimination of repeated sequences in Paramecium. Eukaryot. Cell 2: 1076-1090.
22. Lepère, G., M. Bétermier, E. Meyer, and S. Duharcourt. 2008. Maternal noncoding transcripts antagonize the targeting of DNA elimination by scan-RNAs in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev. 22: 1501-1512.
23. Lepère, G., et al. 2009. Silencing-associated and meiosis-specific small RNA pathways in Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: 903-915.
24. Matsuda, A., and J. D. Forney. 2006. The SUMO pathway is developmentally regulated and required for programmed DNA elimination in Paramecium tetraurelia. Eukaryot. Cell 5: 806-815.
25. Matsuda, A., A. W. Shieh, D. L. Chalker, and J. D. Forney. 2010. The conjugation-specific Die5 protein is required for development of the somatic nucleus in both Paramecium and Tetrahymena. Eukaryot. Cell 9: 1087-1099.
26. Nowacki, M., W. Zagorski-Ostoja, and E. Meyer. 2005. Nowa1p and Nowa2p: novel putative RNA binding proteins involved in trans-nuclear crosstalk in Paramecium tetraurelia. Curr. Biol. 15: 1616-1628.
27. Pines, J. 1996. Cell cycle: reaching for a role for the Cks proteins. Curr. Biol. 6: 1399-1402.
28. Praefcke, G. J., and H. T. McMahon. 2004. The dynamin superfamily: universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 133-147.
29. Prescott, D. M. 1994. The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol. Rev. 58: 233-267.
30. Richardson, H. E., C. S. Stueland, J. Thomas, P. Russell, and S. I. Reed. 1990. Human cDNAs encoding homologs of the small p34Cdc28/Cdc2-associated protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 4: 1332-1344.
31. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
32. Schofield, M. J., and P. Hsieh. 2003. DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanisms and biological function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57: 579-608.
33. Sherman, F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194: 3-21.
34. Sonneborn, T. M. 1974. Paramecium aurelia, p. 469-594. In R. C. King (ed.), Handbook of genetics: plants, plant viruses and protists, vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
35. Stone, J. E., and T. D. Petes. 2006. Analysis of the proteins involved in the in vivo repair of base-base mismatches and four-base loops formed during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173: 1223-1239.
36. Strzyzewska-Jowko, I., M. Jerka-Dziadosz, and J. Frankel. 2003. Effect of alteration in the global body plan on the deployment of morphogenesisrelated protein epitopes labeled by the monoclonal antibody 12G9 in Tetrahymena thermophila. Protist 154: 71-90.
37. Timmons, L., D. L. Court, and A. Fire. 2001. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 263: 103-112.
38. Waldman, A. S. 2008. Ensuring the fidelity of recombination in mammalian chromosomes. Bioessays 30: 1163-1171.
39. Yao, M. C., S. Duharcourt, and D. L. Chalker. 2002. Genome-wide rearrangements of DNA in ciliates, p. 730-758. In N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Lambowitz (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
40. Zagulski, M., et al. 2004. High coding density on the largest Paramecium tetraurelia somatic chromosome. Curr. Biol. 14: 1397-1404.
41. Zhang, H., and J. D. Berger. 1999. A novel member of the cyclin-dependent kinase family in Paramecium tetraurelia. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46: 482-491.