Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without a ureteral stent

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 239-243

  Sethi, Amanjot S ^a   Regan, Stanton M ^b   Sundaram, Chandru P ^c  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; MERTIATIDE TC 99M; MORPHINE; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STENT; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINOMA;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; ROBOTICS; STENTS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79952292257     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0192     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 1949;21:209-210.
2. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256. (Pubitemid 34132065)
3. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995;46:791-795.
4. Moon, DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. J Urol 2006;67:932-936. (Pubitemid 43956421)
5. Calvert RC, Morsy MM, Zelhof B, Rhodes M, Burgess NA. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Endoscopy 2008;22:411-414. (Pubitemid 351238226)
6. Shalhav AL, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Gofrit ON, Gerber GS, Zorn KC. Adult stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty. JSLS 2007;11:8-13.
7. Bernie JE, Venkatesh R, Brown J, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance. JSLS 2005;9:258-261.
8. Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Denstedt JD. The use of stents in contemporary urology. Curr Opin Urol 2004;14:111-115. (Pubitemid 38315405)
9. Rana AM, Sabooh A. Management strategies and results for severely encrusted retained ureteral stents. J Endourol 2007;21:628-632. (Pubitemid 47236190)
10. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a "friendly" procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 2000;85:408-411.
11. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr., Timoney AG. Indwelling ureteral stents: Evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 2003;169:1065-1069. (Pubitemid 36188160)
12. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status. BJU Int 2005;95:102-105. (Pubitemid 40314842)
13. Olsen H, Jorgensen T. Robotic versus standard retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty in children. BJU Int 2003;91:74.
14. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: A systematic review. J Urol 2008;179:424-430.
15. Smith KE, Holmes N, Lieb JI, Mandell J, Baskin LS, Kogan BA. Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature. J Urol 2002;168:1127-1130.