Molecular Library Design Using Multi-Objective Optimization Methods

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 685, Issue , 2011, Pages 53-69

  Nicolaou, Christos A ^a   Kannas, Christos C ^a,b  

^a Noesis Chemoinformatics   (Cyprus)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

MEGALib; multi objective evolutionary algorithm; Multi objective molecular library design; selective library design

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; SYNTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES; SOFTWARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 79952198616     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-931-4_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Ekins, S., Boulanger, B., Swaan, P. W., Hupcey, M. A. (2002) Towards a new age of virtual ADME/TOX and multidimensional drug discovery. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 381–401.
2. Agrafiotis, D. K., Lobanov, V. S., Salemme, F. R. (2002) Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1, 337–346.
3. Baringhaus, K. –H., Matter, H. (2004) Efficient strategies for lead optimization by simultaneously addressing affinity, selectivity and pharmacokinetic parameters, in (Oprea, T., ed.) Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 333–379.
4. Nicolaou, C. A., Brown, N., Pattichis, C. S. (2007) Molecular optimization using computational multi-objective methods. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 10, 316–324.
5. Soltanshahi, F., Mansley, T. E., Choi, S., Clark, R. D. (2006) Balancing focused combinatorial libraries based on multiple GPCR ligands. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20, 529–538.
6. Gillet, V. J., Willet, P., Fleming, P. J., Green, D. V. (2002) Designing focused libraries using MoSELECT. J Mol Graph Model 20, 491–498.
7. Gillet, V. J., Khatib, W., Willett, P., Fleming, P. J., Green, D. V. (2002) Combinatorial library design using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42, 375–385.
8. Agrafiotis, D. K. (2000) Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries. Mol Divers 5, 209–230.
9. Nicolaou, C. A., Apostolakis, J., Pattichis, C. S. (2009) De novo drug design using multiobjective evolutionary graphs. J Chem Inf Model 49, 295–307.
10. Coello Coello, C. A. (2002) Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: a critical review, in (Sarker, R., Mohammadian, M., Yao, X. eds.) Evolutionary Optimization. New York: Springer 48, pp. 117–146.
11. Yann, C., Siarry, P. (eds.) (2004) Multiobjective Optimization: Principles and Case Studies, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
12. Fonseca, C. M., Fleming, P. J. (1998) Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms. I: a unified formulation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 28, 26–37.
13. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L. (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3, 257–271.
14. Gillet, V. J. (2004) Designing combinatorial libraries optimized on multiple objectives in methods in molecular biology, in (Bajorath, J., ed.) Chemoinformatics: Concepts, Methods, and Tools for Drug Discovery. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 275, pp. 335–354.
15. Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Bradshaw, J., Green, D. V. S. (1999) Selecting combinatorial libraries to optimize diversity and physical properties. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 169–177.
16. Zheng, W., Hung, S. T., Saunders, J. T., Seibel, G. L. (2000) PICCOLO: a tool for combinatorial library design via multicrite-rion optimization. Pac Symp Biocomput 5, 585–596.
17. Bemis, A. G. W., Murcko, M. A. (1999) Designing libraries with CNS activity. J Med Chem 42, 4942–4951.
18. Wright, T., Gillet, V. J., Green, D. V., Pickett, S. D. (2003) Optimizing the size and configuration of combinatorial libraries. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43, 381–390.
19. Noesis Chemoinformatics, Ltd. http://www. noesisinformatics.com (accessed August 12, 2009).
20. MoDest. http://www.chil2.de (accessed June 30, 2009).
21. OpenEye, Inc. http://www.eyesopen.com (accessed July 3, 2009).
22. Nicolaou, C. A., Pattichis, C. S. (2006) Molecular substructure mining approaches for computer-aided drug discovery: a review. Proceedings of the 2006 ITAB Conference, October 26–28, Ioannina, Greece.
23. Lewell, X. O., Budd, D. B., Watson, S. P., Hann, M. M. (1998) RECAP – Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: a powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38, 511–522.
24. Barone R., Chanon, M. (2001) A new and simple approach to chemical complexity. Application to the synthesis of natural products. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41, 269–272.
25. Angelis, M. D., Stossi F., Waibel M., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (2005) Isocoumarins as estrogen receptor beta selective ligands: isomers of isoflavone phytoestrogens and their metabolites. Bioorg Med Chem 13, 6529–6542.
26. Wheeler, D. L., et al. (2006) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 34, 173–180.
27. Wild, D. J., Blankley, C. J. (2000) Comparison of 2D fingerprint types and hierarchy level selection methods for structural grouping using wards clustering. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40, 155–162.
28. Kearsley, S. K., Sallamack, S., Fluder, E. M., Andose, J. D., Mosley, R. T., Sheridan, R. P. (1996) Chemical similarity using physio-chemical property descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36, 118–127.
29. Tietze, S., Apostolakis, J. (2007) GlamDock: development and validation of a new docking tool on several thousand protein-ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model 47, 1657–1672.
30. Willet, P., Barnard, J. M., Downs, G. M. (1998) Chemical similarity searching. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 983–996.
31. Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., Feeney, P. J. (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability. Drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Discovery Rev 23, 3–25.
32. Prien, O. (2005) Target-family-oriented focused libraries for kinases – conceptual design aspects and commercial availability. ChemBioChem 6, 500–505.