Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems

Higher Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 495-533

  Dill, David D ^a   Soo, Maarja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic quality; Higher education policy; League tables; Organizational report cards; University rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 22044438799     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Astin, A.W. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorilies and Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
2. Astin, A.W. (1991). Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
3. Astin, A.W. (1996). 'Involvement in learning revisited', Journal of College Student Development 40(5), 587-597.
4. Becker, G.S. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Bowden, R. (2000). 'Fantasy higher education: University and college league tables', Quality in Higher Education 6(1), 41-60.
6. Brennan, J. and Shah, T. (2000). Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change. Buckingham, UK: OECD, SRHE & Open University Press.
7. Brewer, D., Gates, S.M. and Goldman, C.A. (2002). In Pursuit of Prestige: Strategy and Competition in US Higher Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
8. Carrico, C.S., Hogan, S.M., Dyson, R.G. and Athanassopoulos, A.D. (1997). 'Data envelope analysis and university selection', The Journal of the Operational Research Society 48(12), 1163-1177.
9. Clarke, M. (2002). 'Some guidelines for academic quality rankings', Higher Education in Europe 27(4), 443-459.
10. Connor, H., Burton, R., Pearson, R., Pollard, E. and Regan, J. (1999). Making the Right Choice: How Students Choose Universities and Colleges. London: Universities UK.
11. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2003). The Future of Higher Education. London: HMSO.
12. Dill, D.D. (1999). 'Student learning and academic choice: The rule of coherence, in Brennan, J., Fedrowitz, J., Huber, M. and Shah, T. (eds.), What Kind of University? International Perspectives on Knowledge, Participation and Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education, , pp 56-70.
13. Dill, D.D. (2000). 'Designing academic audit: Lessons learned in Europe and Asia', Quality in Higher Education 6(3), 187-207.
14. Dill, D.D. (2003). 'Allowing the market to rule: The case of the United States', Higher Education Quarterly 57(2), 136-157.
15. Drennan, L.T. and Beck, M. (2001). 'Teaching quality performance indicators - Key influences on the UK universities' scores', Quality Assurance in Education 9(2), 92-102.
16. Eccles, C. (2002). 'The use of university rankings in the United Kingdom', Higher Education in Europe 27(4), 423-432.
17. Ehrenberg, R.G. (2002a). 'Reaching for the brass ring: The U. S. News & World Report rankings and competition', The Review of Higher Education 26(2), 145-162.
18. Ehrenberg, R.G. (2002b). Tuition Rising: Why College Costs so Much. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Ehrenberg, R.G. (2003). 'Method or madness?: Inside the USNWR college rankings', Paper presented at the Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education Forum on The Abuse of College Rankings, Madison, Wisconsin, 20-21 November.
20. Ehrenberg, R.G. and Hurst, P.J. (1996). 'A hedonic model', Change 28(3), 46-51.
21. Gormley, W.T.Jr. and Weimer, D.L. (1999). Organizational Report Cards.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. Graham, A. and Thompson, N. (2001). 'Broken ranks: US News' college rankings measure everything but what matters. And most universities don't seem to mind', Washington Monthly 33(9), 9-14.
23. Grunig, S.G. (1997). 'Research, reputation, and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisition', Journal of Higher Education 68(1), 17-52.
24. Higher Education Division, Australia (2001). Characteristics and Performance Indicators of Australian Higher Education Institutions. Occasional Paper Series 01-B, Department of Education, Science and Training: http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/statistics/characteristics/characteristics00.pdf
25. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (1999). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: First Report of the Performance Indicators Steering Croup (PISG). Report 99/11, Higher Education Funding Council for England: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/1999/99%5F11.htm
26. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2003). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: 2000-2001 and 2001-2002. Report 2003/59, Higher Education Funding Council for England: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/perflnd/ 2003/default.asp
27. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
28. Hossler, D., Braxton, J. and Coopersmith, G. (1989). 'Understanding student college choice', in Smart, J.C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol.V. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 231-288.
29. Hossler, D. and Litten, L.H. (1993). Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
30. James, R., Baldwin, G. and McInnis, C. (1999). Which University? The Factors Influencing the Choices of Prospective Undergraduates. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
31. Koelman, J. and Venniker, R. (2001). 'Public funding of academic research: The research assessment exercise in the UK', in CPB and CHEPS (eds.), Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Sdu Uitgevers, pp. 101-117.
32. Kuh, G. (2003). 'What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE', Change 35(2), 24-32.
33. Larsen, K., Martin, J.P. and Morris, R. (2002). Trade in educational services: Trends and emerging issues'. Paper Presented at the OECD Forum on Trade In Educational Services, May 23-24, Washington DC.
34. McDonough, P.M., Antonio, A.L. and Perez, L.X. (1998). 'College rankings: democratized college knowledge for whom?', Research in Higher Education 39(5), 513-537.
35. Manski, C.F. and Wise, D.A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Merisotis, J.P. (2002). 'Summary report of the invitational roundtable on statistical indicators for the quality assessment of higher/tertiary education institutions: Ranking and league table methodologies', Higher Education in Europe 27(4), 475-480.
37. Monks, J and Ehrenberg, R.G. (1999). 'U.S. News & World Report's college rankings: Why they do matter', Change 31(6), 42-51.
38. Moogan, Y.J., Baron, S. and Harris, K. (1999) 'Decision-making behaviour of potential higher education students', Higher Education Quarterly 53(3), 211-228.
39. Morrison, H.G., Magennis, S.P. and Carey, L.J. (1995). 'Performance indicators and league tables: A call for standards', Higher Education Quarterly 49(2), 128-145.
40. National Association of Scholars (1996). The Dissolution of General Education: 1914-1993. Princeton: National Association of Scholars.
41. National Opinion Research Center (1997). A Review of the Methodology for the US News and World Report's Rankings of Undergraduate Colleges and Universities. Washington Monthly: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/ 2000/norc.html
42. Page, S. (1999). 'Rankings of Canadian universities and help to students', Guidance & Counseling 14(3), 11-14.
43. Pascarella, E.T. (2001). 'Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we even close?', Change 33(3), 19-23.
44. Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1998). 'Studying college students in the 21st century: Meeting new challenges', The Review of Higher Education 21(2), 151-165.
46. Paulsen, M.B. (1990). College Choice: Understanding Student Enrollment Behavior. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
47. Provan, D. and Abercromby, K. (2000). University League Tables and Rankings: A Critical Analysis. Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS) Paper No. 30: htpp://www.acu.ac.uk/chems/onlinepublications/976798333. pdf.
48. Ramsden, P. (1991). 'A Performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire', Studies in Higher Education 16(2), 129-149.
49. Rosovsky, H. and Hartley, M. (2002). Evaluation and the Academy: Are We Doing the Right Thing? Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
50. Smith, J., McKnight, A. and Naylor, R. (2000). 'Graduate employability: Policy and performance in higher education in the UK', The Economic Journal 110(June), 382-411.
51. Stecklow, S. (1995). 'Colleges inflate SAT's and graduation rates in popular guidebooks', Wall Street Journal 5 April.
52. Terenzini, P.T. and Pascarella, E.T. (1994). 'Living with myths: Undergraduate education in America', Change 26(1), 28-32.
53. Thompson, N. (2000). 'Playing with numbers: How US News mismeasures higher education and what we can do about it', Washington Monthly 32(9), 16-23.
54. Tight, M. (2000). 'Do league tables contribute to the development of a quality culture? Football and higher education compared', Higher Education Quarterly 54(1), 22-42.
55. Trow, M. (1999). 'Biology at Berkeley: A case study of reorganization and its costs and benefits', Center for Studies in Higher Education: Research and Occasional Papers Series, CSHE.1.99: htpp://ibb.berkeley.edu/cshe/
56. Trow, M.A. (1983). 'Organizing the biological sciences at Berkeley', Change 15(8), 28, 44-53.
57. Wilson, K., Lizzio, A. and Ramsden, P. (1997). 'The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire', Studies in Higher Education 22(1), 3-25.
58. Winston, G.C. and Zimmerman, D.J. (2003). 'Peer effects in higher education', NBER Working Paper 9501: http://www.nber.org/papers/w9501.
59. Yorke, M. (1997). 'A good league table guide?', Quality Assurance in Education 5(2), 61-72.
60. Yorke, M. (1998). 'The Times "League Table" of universities, 1997: A statistical appraisal', Quality in Education 6(1), 58-60.
61. Yorke, M., Barnett, G. Bridges, P., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Knight, P., Scurry, D., Stowell, M. and Woolf, H. (2002). 'Does grading method influence honours degree classification?', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27(3), 269-279.
62. Zemsky, R. and Oedel, P. (1983). The Structure of College Choice. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.