Status-Based Asymmetry in Intergroup Responses: Implications for Intergroup Reconciliation

Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 31-42

  Malloy, Thomas E ^a   Ristikari, Tiina ^b   Berrios Candelaria, Rosalie ^a   Lewis, Beth ^a   Agatstein, Fredric ^a  

^a RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetric block design; Dyadic interaction; Intergroup reconciliation; Intergroup relations; Intergroup status; Social relations model

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; EUROPEAN AMERICAN; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 79952075754     PISSN: 10999809     EISSN: 19390106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021666     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allport B.W. The nature of prejudice 1958, Doubleday, Garden City, NJ.
2. Blascovich J., Mendes W.B., Hunter S.B., Lickel B., Kowai-Bell N. Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:253-267.
3. Brown R., Hewstone M. An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in experimental social psychology 2005, 37:255-343. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
4. Campbell D.T. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science 1958, 3:14-25.
5. Depret E.F., Fiske S.T. Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1999, 35:461-480.
6. Dovidio J.F., Kawakami K., Gaertner S.L. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:62-68.
7. Duncan S., Fiske D.W. Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory 1977, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Eberhardt J.L., Godd P.A., Purdie V.J., Davies P.G. Seeing Black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87:876-893.
9. Fiske S.T. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist 1993, 48:621-628.
10. Fiske S.T. Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. Handbook of social psychology 2010, 5:941-982. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
11. Gallagher J. The F test for comparing two normal variances: Correct and incorrect calculation of the two-sided p value. Teaching Statistics 2006, 28:58-60.
12. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity 1963, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Goodwin S.A., Gubin A., Fiske S.T., Yzerbyt V. Power can bias impression formation: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2000, 3:227-256.
14. Guinote A., Judd C.M., Brauer M. Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:708-721.
15. Hugenberg K., Miller J., Claypool H.M. Categroization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 43:334-340.
16. Ickes W. Compositions in black and white: Determinants of interactions in interracial dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 47:330-341.
17. Islam M.R., Hewstone M. Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1993, 19:700-710.
18. John O.P. The " Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 1990, 66-100. Guilford Press, New York. L.A. Pervin (Ed.).
19. Jones E.E., Wood G.C., Quattrone G.A. Perceived variability of personal characteristics in in-groups and out-groups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1981, 7:523-528.
20. Judd C.M., Park B. Outgroup homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:778-788.
21. Keltner D., Gruenfeld D.H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 2003, 110:265-284.
22. Kenny D.A. Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis 1994, Guilford Press, New York.
23. Kenny D.A., Albright L., Malloy T.E., Kashy D.A. Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:245-258.
24. Kenny D.A., Malloy T.E. Partner effects in social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1988, 12:34-57.
25. Kenny D.A., West T., Malloy T.E., Albright L. Componential analysis of interpersonal perception data. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10:282-294.
26. Linville P.W., Fischer G.W., Salovey P. Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:165-188.
27. Linville P.W., Fischer G.W., Yoon C. Perceived covariation among the features of in-group and out-group members: The out-group covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:421-436.
28. Littleford L.N., Wright M.O., Sayoc-Parial M. White students' intergroup anxiety during same-race and interracial interactions: A multimethod approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2005, 27:85-94.
29. Lorenzo-Cioldi F. Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. European review of social psychology 1998, 9:31-75. Wiley, New York. W. Strobe, M. Hewstone (Eds.).
30. Malloy T.E. Intergroup relations and reconciliation: A theoretical and methodological analysis. Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation 2008, Oxford University Press, New York. A. Nadler, T.E. Malloy, J.D. Fisher (Eds.).
31. Malloy T.E., Barcelos S., Arruda E., DeRosa M., Fonseca C. Individual differences and cross-situational consistency of dyadic social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:643-654.
32. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:3-35.
33. Miller S., Malloy T.E. Interpersonal behavior, perception, and affect in status-discrepant dyads: Social interaction of gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 2003, 4:121-135.
34. Monteith M.J. Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:469-485.
35. Morrison K.R., Fast N.J., Ybarra O. Group status, perceptions of threat, and support for social inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:204-210.
36. Nadler A., Malloy T.E., Fisher J.D. The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation 2008, Oxford University Press, New York.
37. Neuberg S.L., Fiske S.T. Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53:431-444.
38. Norton M.I., Sommers S.R., Apfelbaum E.P., Pura N., Ariely D. Color blindness and interracial interaction: Playing the political correctness game. Psychological Science 2006, 17:949-953.
39. Operario D., Fiske S.T. Effect of trait dominance on power holders' judgments of subordinates. Social Cognition 2001, 19:161-180.
40. Ostrom T.M., Carpenter S.L., Sedikides C., Li F. Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 64:21-34.
41. Paolini S., Hewstone M., Cairns E. Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:1406-1420.
42. Park B., Ryan C.S., Judd C.M. Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 63:553-567.
43. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:751-783.
44. Richeson J.A., Baird A.A., Gordon H.L., Heatherton T.F., Wyland C.L., Trawalter S., Shelton J.N. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:1323-1328.
45. Richeson J.A., Shelton J.N. Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, & possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007, 16:316-320.
46. Richeson J.A., Trawalter S. Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:934-947.
47. Sedikides C. Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information: The role of relative group status in permeable boundary theory. European Journal of Social Psychology 1997, 27:121-144.
48. Shelton J.N. Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2003, 62:171-185.
49. Shelton J.N., Richeson J.A. Interracial interactions: A relational approach. Advances in experimental social psychology 2006, 38:121-181. Academic Press, New York. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
50. Shriver E.R., Young S.G., Hugenberg K., Bernstein M.J., Lanter J.R. Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:260-274.
51. Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
52. Sigelman L., Bledsoe T., Welch S., Combs M.W. Making contact? Black-White social interaction in an urban setting. The American Journal of Sociology 1996, 101:1306-1332.
53. Sigelman L., Tuch S.A. Meta-stereotypes: Blacks' perceptions of Whites' stereotypes of Blacks. Public Opinion Quarterly 1997, 61:87-101.
54. Stephan W.G., Stephan C.W. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Reducing prejudice and discrimination 2000, 23-45. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S. Oskamp (Ed.).
55. Stevens L.E., Fiske S.T. Motivated impression of a powerholder: Accuracy under task dependency and misperception under evaluation dependency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:907-922.
56. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Social identity and intergroup relations 1979, 15-40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.).
57. Trawalter S., Richeson J.A. Let's talk about race, Baby! When Whites' and Blacks' interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:1214-1217.
58. Van Rooy D., Van Overwalle F., Labiouse C., French R. A recurrent connectionist model of group biases. Psychological Review 2003, 110:536-563.
59. Vorauer J.D. An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. Psychological Review 2006, 113:862-886.
60. Vorauer J.D., Hunter A.J., Main K.J., Roy S.A. Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:690-707.
61. Wright S.C., Aron A., Brody S.M. Extended contact and including others in the self: Building on the Allport/Pettigrew legacy. Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew 2008, 143-159. Blackwell, Malden, MA. U. Wagner, L.R. Tropp, C. Tredous (Eds.).
62. Wright S.C., Brody S.M., Aron A. Intergroup contact: Still our best hope for improving intergroup relations. Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues 2005, 115-142. Lewinian Press, Seattle, WA. C.S. Crandall, M. Schaller (Eds.).
63. Yzerbyt V., Demoulin S. Intergroup relations. Handbook of social psychology 2010, 5:1024-1083. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).