Individual differences and cross-situational consistency of dyadic social behavior

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 643-654

  Malloy, Thomas E ^a   Barcelos, Suzy ^a   Arruda, Elise ^b   DeRosa, Michael ^a   Fonseca, Crystal ^c  

^a RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross situational consistency; Dyadic behavior; Individual differences; Mus musculus; Social relations model

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; FEMALE; MALE; MOUSE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; MICE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 27944437564     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.643     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Albright, L., & Malloy, T. E. (2000). Experimental validity: Brunswik, Campbell, Cronbach, and enduring issues. Review of General Psychology, 4, 337-353.
2. Aldhous, P. (1989). The effects of individual cross-fostering on the development of intrasexual kin discrimination in social and non-social behaviour of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice. Behaviour, 112, 741-750.
3. Bowers, J. M., & Alexander, B. K. (1967, December 1). Mice: Individual recognition by olfactory cues. Science, 158, 1208-1210.
4. Buss, D. M. (1981). Predicting parent-child interactions from children's activity level. Developmental Psychology, 17, 59-65.
5. Buss. D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
6. Capitanio, J. P. (1984). Early experience and social processes in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): 1. Dyadic social interaction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98, 35-44.
7. Cattell, R. B., & Korth, B. (1973). The isolation of temperament dimensions in dogs. Behavioral Biology, 9, 15-30.
8. Duncan. S., & Fiske. D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale. NJ: Academic Press.
9. Duncan, S., Kanki, B. G., Mokros. H., & Fiske, D. W. (1984). Pseudounilaterality: Simple rate variables and other ills to which interaction research is heir. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1335-1348.
10. Dunlap, K. D. (2002). Hormonal and body size correlates of electrocommunication behavior during dyadic interaction in a weakly electric fish. Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Hormones and Behavior, 41, 187-194.
11. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
12. Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-974.
13. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45-86.
15. Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Burke, T. (1999, July 22). Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature, 400, 358-360.
16. Hall, C. S. (1951). Individual differences. In C. P. Stone (Ed.), Comparative psychology (3rd ed., pp. 423-457). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: I: Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.
18. Hayashi, S., & Kimura, T. (1974). Sex attractant emitted by female mice. Physiology & Behavior, 13, 563-567.
19. Hebb, D. O., Thompson, R. W. (1954). The social significance of animal studies. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 532-561). Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
20. Hilakivi-Clarke, L. A., & Lister, R. G. (1992). Are there preexisting behavioral characteristics that predict the dominant status of male NIH Swiss mice (Mus musculus)? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 184-189.
21. Hubbard, J. A., Dodge, K. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Coie, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 268-280.
22. Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1978). Social behavior at 33 months in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads. Child Development, 49, 557-569.
23. Jones, R. B., & Nowell, N. W. (1974). A comparison of the aversive and female attractant properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Animal Learning & Behavior, 2, 141-144.
24. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Kenny, D. A. (1995). SOREMO: A FORTRAN program for the analysis of round-robin data structures [Computer software]. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
26. Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Partner effects in social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 34-57.
27. Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
28. Loehlin, J. C. (1989). Partitioning environmental and genetic contributions to behavioral development. American Psychologist, 44, 1285-1292.
29. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419-428.
32. Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (2001). Multiple and single interaction designs for dyadic research: Conceptual and analytic issues. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1-19.
33. Malloy, T. E., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199-225.
34. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
35. Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African-American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896-918.
36. Mignon, A., & Mollaret, P. (2002). Applying the affordance conception of traits: A person perception study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1327-1334.
37. Miller, S., & Malloy, T. E. (2003). Interpersonal behavior, affect, and perception in status discrepant dyads: Gay and heterosexual men in social interaction. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 121-135.
38. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
39. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
40. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
41. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive affective personality system (CAPS). In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 197-218). New York: Guilford Press.
42. Negrao, N., & Schmidek, W. R. (1987). Individual differences in the behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 107-111.
43. Newcomb, T. M. (1929). The consistency of certain extrovert-introvert behavior patterns in 51 problem boys. New York: Columbia University Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.
44. Nissen, H. W. (1951). Social behavior in primates. In C. P. Stone (Ed.), Comparative psychology (3rd ed., pp. 423-457). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Ozer, D. J. (1985). Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307-315.
46. Peters, S., Kinsey, P., & Malloy, T. E. (2004). Gender and leadership perceptions among African Americans. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 93-101.
47. Pinto, C. M. H., & Schmidek, W. R. (1994). Individual differences in the behavior of albino and wild house mice (Mus musculus). International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 7, 61-75.
48. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
51. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 674-687.
52. Smith, J., Hurst, J. L., & Barnard, C. J. (1994). Comparing behavior in wild and laboratory strains of the house mouse: Levels of comparison and functional inference. Behavioural Processes, 32, 79-86.
53. Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-948). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
54. Suomi, S. J. (1991). Uptight and laid-back monkeys: Individual differences in response to social challenges. In S. E. Brauth, W. S. Hall, & R. J. Dooling (Eds.), Plasticity of development (pp. 27-56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Terranova, M. L., & Laviola, G. (2001). δ-opioid modulation of social interactions in juvenile mice weaned at different ages. Physiology & Behavior, 73, 393-400.
56. Terranova, M. L., Laviola, G., & Alleva, E. (1993). Ontogeny of amicable social behavior in the mouse: Gender differences and ongoing isolation outcomes, Developmental Psychobiology, 26, 467-481.
57. Terranova, M. L., Loggi, G., Chiarotti, F., & Laviola, G. (2000). Attractivity and social preferences in mice (Mus musculus domesticus): The role of prepubertal sexual segregation and of precocious weaning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 325-334.
58. Tryon, R. C. (1931a). Studies in individual differences in maze ability: III. The community of function between two maze abilities. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 95-116.
59. Tryon, R, C. (1931b). Studies in individual differences in maze ability: IV. The constancy of individual differences: Correlation between learning and relearning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 303-345.
60. Tryon, R. C. (1934). Individual differences. In F. A. Moss (Ed.), Comparative psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742-1757.
62. West, P. M., & Packer, C. (2002, August 23). Sexual selection, temperature, and the lion's mane. Science, 297, 1339-1343.
63. Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to disposi tional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159-1177.
64. Yerkes, R. M. (1939). The life history and personality of the chimpanzee. American Naturalist, 73, 97-112.