Beginning teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of new mathematics curriculum materials

Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 223-244

  Christou, Constantinos ^a   Menon, Maria Eliophotou ^a   Philippou, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952073208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203884645     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
2. Bullough, R. (1992). Beginning teacher curriculum decision making, personal teaching metaphors, and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 239-252.
3. Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8.
4. Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157-176.
5. Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. London: HMSO.
6. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.
7. Fuller, F. (1969). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
8. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: patterns, principles and potholes. Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
9. Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers' emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 967-983.
10. Huberman, M. (1992). Teacher development and instructional mastery. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 122-142). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002). Lost at sea: New teachers' experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.
12. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers' conceptions of a reform curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 227-252.
14. Lloyd, G. M. (2002). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials: The role of curriculum in teacher development. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 149-159). Utrecht:Kluwer Academic.
15. McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the efficacy-based change model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 471-485.
16. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Job satisfaction among America's teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation. Washington, DC:US Department of Education.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, VA: Author.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
20. Nelson, B. (1997). Learning about teacher change in the context of mathematics reform: Where have we come from? In E. Fennema & B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition. (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Romberg, T. (1997). Mathematics in context. In E. Fennema & B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 357-380) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Senger, S. E. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 199-221.
23. Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249-275.
24. Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice:The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 142-175.
25. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
26. Van Den Berg, R. (1993). The concerns-based adoption model in the Netherlands, Flanders and the United Kingdom: State of the art and perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19, 51-63.
27. Van Den Berg, R. (2002). Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72 (4), 577-625.
28. Van Den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation:Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 331-350.
29. Vandenberghe, R. (2002). Teachers' professional development as the core of school improvement (Guest editorial). International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 653-659.
30. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.
31. Weiss, E. M. (1999). Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers' morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention: A secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 861-879.
32. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130-178.