A debugging perspective on end-user mashup programming

Proceedings - 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 149-156

  Cao, Jill ^a   Rector, Kyle ^a   Park, Thomas H ^b   Fleming, Scott D ^a   Burnett, Margaret ^a   Wiedenbeck, Susan ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN BEHAVIORS; END USERS; GENDER DIFFERENCES; MASHUPS;

WEBSITES;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 79952060135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VLHCC.2010.29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 8(2):191-215, 1977.
2. Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Grigoreanu, V., and Wiedenbeck, S. Gender HCI: What about the software? Computer 39(11):83-87, 2006.
3. Cao, J., Riche, Y., Wiedenbeck, S., Burnett, M. and Grigoreanu, V. End-user mashup programming: Through the design lens, In Proc. CHI, 1009-1018, 2010.
4. Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19(2), 1995.
5. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer, 2006.
6. Grigoreanu, V., Cao, J., Kulesza, T., Bogart, C., Rector, K., Burnett, M., and Wiedenbeck, S. Can feature design reduce the gender gap in end-user software development environments? In Proc. VL/HCC, 149-156, 2008.
7. Grigoreanu, V., Brundage, J., Bahna, E., Burnett, M., ElRif, P., and Snover, J. Males' and females' script debugging strategies. In Proc. EUD, 205-224, 2009.
8. Jones, M. and Churchill, E. Conversations in developer communities: A preliminary study of the Yahoo! Pipes community, In Proc. C&T, 195-204, 2009.
9. Ko, A. and Myers, B. Finding causes of program output with the Java Whyline. In Proc. CHI, 1569-1578, 2009.
10. Lin, J., Wong, J., Nichols, J., Cypher, A., and Lau, T. End-user programming of mashups with Vegemite, In Proc. IUI, 97-106, 2009.
11. Meyers-Levy, J. Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising. Lexington-Books, 1989.
12. Myers, B., Weitzman, D., Ko, A., and Chau, D. Answering why and why not questions in user interfaces, In Proc. CHI, 397-406, 2006. (Pubitemid 44032124)
13. Rosson, M. and Carroll, J. Active programming strategies for reuse. In Proc. ECOOP, 1993.
14. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, 1983.
15. Sprent, P. and Smeeton, N. Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Chapman & Hall, 2000.
16. Subrahmaniyan, N., Beckwith, L., Grigoreanu, V., Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Narayanan, V., Bucht, K., Drummond, R., and Fern, X. Testing vs. code inspection vs. ... what else? Male and female end users debugging strategies, In Proc. CHI, 617-626, 2008.
17. TGS Systems, Prograph Reference, The Gunakara Sun Systems, Ltd., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1989.
18. Valkenburg, R. and Dorst, K. The reflective practice of design teams, Design Studies 19, 249-271, 1998. (Pubitemid 128413084)
19. Wang, G., Yang, S., and Han, Y. Mashroom: End-user mashup programming using nested tables, In Proc. WWW, 861-870, 2009.
20. Wilson, A., Burnett, M., Beckwith, L., Granatir, O., Casburn, L., Cook, C., Durham, M. and Rothermel, G. Harnessing curiosity to increase correctness in end-user programming, In Proc. CHI, 305-312, 2003.
21. Wong, J. and Hong, J. Making mashups with Marmite: Towards end-user programming for the web. In Proc. CHI, 1435-1444, 2007. (Pubitemid 47581735)
22. Zang, N. and Rosson, M. What's in a mashup? And why? Studying the perceptions of web-active end users, In Proc. VL/HCC, 31-38, 2008.
23. Zang, N. and Rosson, M. Playing with information: How end users think about and integrate dynamic data, In Proc. VL/HCC, 85-92, 2009.