End-user mashup programming: Through the design lens

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1009-1018

  Cao, Jill ^a   Riche, Yann ^b   Wiedenbeck, Susan ^c   Burnett, Margaret ^a   Grigoreanu, Valentina ^a,d  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Riche Design   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MICROSOFT   (United States)

Author keywords

design; end user programming; mashups

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL DATA; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN MODELS; DESIGN THEORY; END USER PROGRAMMERS; END USER PROGRAMMING; END USERS; MASHUPS; REFLECTION-IN-ACTION;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LENSES; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING;

EID: 77953967823     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753477     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory behavioral change. Psychological Review 8, 2 (1977), 191-215.
2. Bayazit N. Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues 20, 1 (2004), 16-29.
3. Beckwith, L. Burnett, M., Wiedenbeck, S., Cook, C., Sorte, S., and Hastings, M. Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: Are there gender issues? In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 869-878.
4. Beckwith, L., Burnett, M., Grigoreanu, V., and Wiedenbeck, S. Gender HCI: What about the software? IEEE Computer 39, 11 (2006), 83-87.
5. Boden, M. The Dimensions of Creativity. MIT Press Cambridge, London, England, 1994.
6. Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19, 2 (1995), 189-211.
7. Do, E. and Gross, M. Inferring design intentions from designers' sketches - An investigation of freehand drawing conventions in design, In Proc. CAADRIA'97 (1997).
8. Gray, W. D. and Anderson, J. R. Change-episodes in coding: When and how do programmers change their code? Second Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1987.
9. Grigoreanu, V., Cao, J., Kulesza, T., Bogart, C., Rector, K., Burnett, M., and Wiedenbeck, S., Can feature design reduce the gender gap in end-user software development environments? In Proc. VL/HCC 2008, IEEE (2008), 149-156.
10. Guilford, J. P. Intelligence, Creativity and Their Educational Implications. Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, CA, 1968.
11. Guindon, R. Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction 5, 2 (1990), 305-344.
12. Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y., and Klemmer, S. Design as exploration: Creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In Proc. UIST 2008, ACM Press (2008), 91-100.
13. Jeffries, R., Turner, A. A., Polson, P. G., and Atwood, M. E. The processes involved in designing software. In Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, Anderson, J. R. (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981, 255-283.
14. Herring, S., Chang, C., Krantzler, J., and Bailey, B. P., Getting inspired! Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 87-96.
15. Kannengiesser, U. and Zhu, L. An ontologically-based evaluation of software design methods, The Knowledge Engineering Review 24, 1 (2009), 41-58.
16. Ko, A. J., Myers, B., and Aung, H. Six learning barriers in end-user programming systems. In Proc. VL/HCC 2004, IEEE Computer Society (2004), 199-206.
17. Landay, J. A. and Myers, B. A., Sketching interfaces: Toward more human interface design, IEEE Computer 34, 3(2001), 56-64.
18. Milgram, R. M. Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone, in Theories of Creativity. Mark, R. A. and Robert, A. S. (Ed.). Sage Publications, London, UK, 1990.
19. Myers, B., Park, S. Y., Nakano, Y., Mueller, and G., Ko, A. How designers design and program interactive behaviors. In Proc. VL/HCC 2008, IEEE (2008), 177-184.
20. Nardi, B. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End-User Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
21. Rist, R. S. Knowledge creation and retrieval in program design: A comparison of novice and intermediate student programmers. Human-Computer Interaction 6, 1 (1991), 1-46.
22. Rode, J. and Rosson M. B. Programming at runtime: Requirements and paradigms for nonprogrammers' web application development. In Proc. VL/HCC 2003, IEEE (2003), 23-30.
23. Rosson, M. B., Sinha, H., Bhattacharya, M., Zhao, D. Design planning in end-user web development, In Proc. VL/HCC, IEEE (2007).
24. Rowe, M. B. Teaching Science as Continuous Inquiry (2nd. Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
25. Runco, M. A. Creativity Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2007.
26. Schön, D. A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1983.
27. Simpson, M. and Viller, S. Observing architectural design: Improving the development of collaborative design environments. In Proc. CDDVE'04 (2004).
28. Sommerville, I. Software Engineering (8th Ed.), Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, England 2006.
29. Terry, M., Mynatt, E., Nakakoji, K., and Yamamoto, Y. Variation in element and action: Supporting simultaneous development of alternative solutions. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 711-718.
30. Visser, W. Organization of design activities: Opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting with Computers 6, 3 (1994), 239-274.
31. Visser, W. Designing as construction of representations: a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research. Human-Computer Interaction 21, 1 (2006), 103-152 (Pubitemid 43942155)
32. Wong, J. and Hong, J. I. Making mashups with marmite: Towards end-user programming for the web. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1435-1444.