Just noticeable difference in olfaction is related to trigeminal component of odorants

Rhinology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 281-284

  Jacquot, L ^a   Hidalgo, J ^a   Brand, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Just noticeable difference; Olfactory perception; Sex differences; Trigeminal nerve

Indexed keywords

BUTANOL; PHENETHYL ALCOHOL; PYRIDINE; PYRIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADULT; BUTANOLS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODORS; PHENYLETHYL ALCOHOL; PYRIDINES; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SMELL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952058927     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhino09.200     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brand G. Olfactory/trigeminal interactions in nasal chemoreception. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006; 30: 908-917. (Pubitemid 44292851)
2. Lang J. Clinical Anatomy of the Nose, Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1989.
3. Cain WS, Murphy CL. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature. 1980; 284: 255-257. (Pubitemid 10112042)
4. Cometto-Muniz JE, Hernandez S. Odorous and pungent attributes of mixed and unmixed odorants. Percept Psychophys. 1990; 47: 391-399. (Pubitemid 20198503)
5. Doty RL, Brugger WPE, Jurs PC, et al. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmics and normal humans. Physiol Behav. 1978; 20: 175-185. (Pubitemid 8298894)
6. Stone H, Rebert CS. Observations on trigeminal olfactory interactions. Brain Res. 1970; 21: 138-142.
7. Stone H, Williams B, Carregal EJA. The role of the trigeminal nerve in olfaction. Exp Neurol. 1968; 21: 11-19.
8. Cometto-Muniz JE, Cain WS. Thresholds for odor and nasal pungency. Physiol Behav. 1990; 48: 719-725.
9. Cometto-Muniz JE, Cain WS. Trigeminal and olfactory sensitivity: Comparison of modalities and methods of measurement. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998; 71: 105-110. (Pubitemid 28132621)
10. Hummel T. Assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000; 36: 147-155. (Pubitemid 30160742)
11. Jacquot L, Monnin J, Brand G. Uncouscious odor detection could not be due to odor itself. Brain Res. 2004; 1002: 51-54. (Pubitemid 38251577)
12. Jacquot L, Monnin J, Brand G. Influence of nasal trigeminal stimuli on olfactory sensitivity. CR Biologies, 2004; 327: 305-311. (Pubitemid 38647265)
13. Le Berre E, Béno N, Ishii A, Chabanet C, Etiévant P, Thomas- Danguin T. Just noticeable differences in component concentrations modify the odor quality of a blending mixture. Chem Sens. 33, 389-395.
14. Eichenbaum H, Morton TH, Potter H, et al. Selective olfactory deficits in case H.M. Brain. 1983; 106: 459-472. (Pubitemid 13098520)
15. Slotnik BM, Bell GA, Panhuber H, et al. Detection and discrimination of proprionic acid after removal of its 2-DG identified major focus in the olfactory bulb: A psychophysical analysis. Brain Res. 1997; 762: 89-96. (Pubitemid 27315938)
16. Doty RL. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2003.
17. Brand G, Millot JL. Sex differences in human olfaction: Between evidence and enigma. Quart J Exp Psychol. 2001; 54B: 259-270. (Pubitemid 33610333)
18. McKee S, Klein SA, Teller DY. Statistical properties of forcedchoice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Percep Psychophys. 1985; 37: 286-298.
19. Brand G, Jacquot L. Quality of odor and olfactory lateralization processes in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 316: 91-94. (Pubitemid 34001668)
20. Medina MRG, Cain WS. Bilateral integration in the common chemical sense. Physiol Behav. 1982; 29: 349-353. (Pubitemid 13237374)
21. Stevens JC, Plantinga A, Cain WS. Reduction of odor and nasal pungency associated with aging. Neurobiol Aging. 1982; 3: 125-132. (Pubitemid 13198770)
22. Dunn JD, Cometto-Muniz JE, Cain WS Nasal reflexes: Reduced sensitivity to CO2 irritation in cigarette smokers. J Appl Toxicol. 1982; 2: 176-178. (Pubitemid 13178392)
23. Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, et al. Chemosensory event-related potentials change as a function of age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 108: 208-217.
24. Olofsson JK, Nordin S. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials. Chem Sens. 2004; 29: 629-637. (Pubitemid 41289302)
25. Lundström JN, Frasnelli J, Larsson M, et al. Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005; 57: 181-186. (Pubitemid 41139880)
26. Frasnelli J, Charbonneau G, Collignon O, et al. Odor localization and sniffing. Chem Sens. 2009; 34: 139-144.
27. Hummel T, Futschik T, Frasnelli J, et al. Effects of olfactory function, age and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: A study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli. Toxicol Lett. 2003; 140: 273-280. (Pubitemid 36382899)
28. Wysocki CJ, Cowart BJ. Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the life span. Percept Pychophys. 2003; 65: 115-122. (Pubitemid 37544902)
29. Brand G, Millot JL, Saffaux M, et al. Lateralization in human nasal chemoreception: Differences in bilateral electrodermal responses related to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 133: 205-210. (Pubitemid 34754396)
30. Iannilli E, Gerber J, Frasnelli J, et al. Intranasl trigeminal function in subjects with and without an intact sense of smell. Brain Res. 2007; 1139: 235-244.
31. Barrios FA, Gonzales L, Favila R, et al. Olfaction and neurodegeneration in HD. Clin Neurosci Neuropathol. 2006; 18: 73-76. (Pubitemid 46183393)
32. Doty RL. The olfactory vector hypothesis of neurodegenerative disease: It is viable? Ann Neurol. 2008; 63: 7-15. (Pubitemid 351240546)