Influence of arterial wall-stenosis compliance on the coronary diagnostic parameters

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 842-847

  Konala, Bhaskar Chandra ^a   Das, Ashish ^a   Banerjee, Rupak K ^a  

^a 705 Engineering Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery stenosis; Fluid structure interaction; Fractional Flow Reserve; Functional diagnostic parameters; Lesion flow coefficient; Pressure drop coefficient

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVES; FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTICS; LESION FLOW COEFFICIENT; PRESSURE DROP COEFFICIENT;

CELL PROLIFERATION; ELASTICITY; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUIDS; HEART; MUSCLE; NON NEWTONIAN LIQUIDS; PRESSURE DROP; RATING;

NON NEWTONIAN FLOW;

ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELASTICITY; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPEREMIC STENOSIS RESISTANCE INDEX; LESION FLOW COEFFICIENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOONEY RIVLIN MODEL; PRESSURE DROP COEFFICIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER;

ARTERIES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERICARDIUM; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79952043366     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alfonso F., Macaya C., Goicolea J., Hernandez R., Segovia J., Zamorano J., Banuelos C., Zarco P. Determinants of coronary compliance in patients with coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1994, 23:879-884.
2. Back L.H., Denton T.A. Some arterial wall shear stress estimates in coronary angioplasty: catheter obstruction effect. Advances in Bioengineering 1992, ASME BED.
3. Back L.H., Kwack E.Y., Back M.R. Flow rate-pressure drop relation in coronary angioplasty: catheter obstruction effect. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1996, 118:83-89.
4. Banerjee R.K., Ashtekar K.D., Effat M.A., Helmy T.A., Kim E., Schneeberger E.W., Sinha R.A., Gottliebson W.M., Back L.H. Concurrent assessment of epicardial coronary artery stenosis and microvascular dysfunction using diagnostic endpoints derived from fundamental fluid dynamics principles. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 2009, 21:511-517.
5. Banerjee R.K., Ashtekar K.D., Helmy T.A., Effat M.A., Back L.H., Khoury S.F. Hemodynamic diagnostics of epicardial coronary stenoses: in-vitro experimental and computational study. Biomedical Engineering Online 2008, 7:24.
6. Banerjee R.K., Sinha Roy A., Back L.H., Back M.R., Khoury S.F., Millard R.W. Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:652-662.
7. Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Back M.R. Effects of diagnostic guidewire catheter presence on translesional hemodynamic measurements across significant coronary artery stenoses. Biorheology 2003, 40:613-635.
8. Cho Y.I., Kensey K.R. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology 1991, 28:241-262.
9. Cho Y.I., Back L.H., Crawford D.W., Cuffel R.F. Experimental study of pulsatile and steady flow through a smooth tube and an atherosclerotic coronary artery casting of man. Journal of Biomechanics 1983, 16:933-946.
10. Fearon W.F., Tonino P.A.L., De Bruyne B., Siebert U., Pijls N.H.J. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation (FAME) study. American Heart Journal 2007, 154:632-636.
11. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York.
12. Gould K.L. Collapsing Stenosis: Coronary Artery Stenosis and Reversing Atherosclerosis 1999, Arnold, London, UK, pp. 79-92.
13. Holzapfel G.A. Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. A Continuum Approach for Engineering 2000, Wiley, Chichester.
14. Jeremias A., Spies C., Herity N.A., Pomerantsev E., Yock P.G., Fitzgerald P.J., Yeung A.C. Coronary artery compliance and adaptive vessel remodelling in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. Heart 2000, 84:314-319.
15. Kern M.J., Lerman A., Bech J.W., De Bruyne B., Eeckhout E., Fearon W.F., Higano S.T., Lim M.J., Meuwissen M., Piek J.J., Pijls N.H., Siebes M., Spaan J.A. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006, 114:1321-1341.
16. Lederman S., Menegus M.A., Greenberg M.A. Fractional Flow Reserve. American College of Cardiology Current Journal Review 1997, 6:34-35.
17. Meuwissen M., Siebes M., Chamuleau S.A., van Eck-Smit B.L., Koch K.T., de Winter R.J., Tijssen J.G., Spaan J.A., Piek J.J. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation 2002, 106:441-446.
18. Peelukhana S.V., Back L.H., Banerjee R.K. Influence of coronary collateral flow on coronary diagnostic parameters: an in vitro study. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:2753-2759.
19. Pijls N.H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., Peels K., Bracke F.A., Bonnier H.J., el Gamal M.I. Fractional Flow Reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995, 92:3183-3193.
20. Pijls N.H., van Son J.A., Kirkeeide R.L., De Bruyne B., Gould K.L. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993, 87:1354-1367.
21. Roy A.S., Back L.H., Banerjee R.K. Evaluation of compliance of arterial vessel using coupled fluid structure interaction analysis. Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics 2008, 5:229-245.
22. Roy A.S., Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Back M.R., Khoury S., Millard R.W. Delineating the guide-wire flow obstruction effect in assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2005, 289:H392-H397.
23. Shaw J.A., Kingwell B.A., Walton A.S., Cameron J.D., Pillay P., Gatzka C.D., Dart A.M. Determinants of coronary artery compliance in subjects with and without angiographic coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2002, 39:1637-1643.
24. Siebes M., Verhoeff B.J., Meuwissen M., de Winter R.J., Spaan J.A., Piek J.J. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 2004, 109:756-762.
25. Siebes M., Chamuleau S.A., Meuwissen M., Piek J.J., Spaan J.A. Influence of hemodynamic conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: parametric analysis of underlying model. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2002, 283:H1462-H1470.
26. Siebes M., Campbell C.S., D'Argenio D.Z. Fluid dynamics of a partially collapsible stenosis in a flow model of the coronary circulation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1996, 118:489-497.
27. Silber S., Albertsson P., Aviles F.F., Camici P.G., Colombo A., Hamm C., Jorgenson E., Marco J., Nordrehaug J.E., Ruzyllo W., Urban P., Stone G.W., Wijns W. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions: the task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European society of cardiology. European Heart Journal 2005, 26(8):804-847.
28. Sinha Roy A., Back M.R., Khoury S.F., Schneeberger E.W., Back L.H., Velury V.V., Millard R.W., Banerjee R.K. Functional and anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery stenoses. Journal of Surgical Research 2008, 150:24-33.
29. Spaan J.A., Piek J.J., Hoffman J.I., Siebes M. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation 2006, 113:446-455.
30. Tang D., Yang C., Kobayashi S., Zheng J., Woodard P.K., Teng Z., Billiar K., Bach R., Ku D.N. 3D MRI-based anisotropic FSI models with cyclic bending for human coronary atherosclerotic plaque mechanical analysis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2009, 131:061010.
31. Tang D., Yang J., Yang C., Ku D.N. A nonlinear axisymmetric model with fluid-wall interactions for steady viscous flow in stenotic elastic tubes. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1999, 121:494-501.
32. Tonino P.A., Fearon W.F., De Bruyne B., Oldroyd K.G., Leesar M.A., Ver Lee P.N., Maccarthy P.A., Van't Veer M., Pijls N.H. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the fame study Fractional Flow Reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. Journal of American College of Cardiology 2010, 55:2816-2821.
33. Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., Siebert U., Ikeno F., van' t Veer M., Klauss V., Manoharan G., Engstrom T., Oldroyd K.G., Ver Lee P.N., MacCarthy P.A., Fearon W.F. Fractional Flow Reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 360:213-224.
34. White C.W., Wright C.B., Doty D.B., Hiratza L.F., Eastham C.L., Harrison D.G., Marcus M.L. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?. New England Journal of Medicine 1984, 310:819-824.
35. Wilson R.F., Johnson M.R., Marcus M.L., Aylward P.E., Skorton D.J., Collins S., White C.W. The effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1988, 77:873-885.
36. Yang C., Tang D., Kobayashi S., Zheng J., Woodard P.K., Teng Z., Bach R., Ku D.N. Cyclic bending contributes to high stress in a human coronary atherosclerotic plaque and rupture risk: in vitro experimental modeling and ex vivo MRI-based computational modeling approach. Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics 2008, 5:259-274.