Characterizing momentum change and viscous loss of a hemodynamic endpoint in assessment of coronary lesions

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 652-662

  Banerjee, Rupak K ^a   Sinha Roy, Abhijit ^a   Back, Lloyd H ^b   Back, Martin R ^c   Khoury, Saeb F ^d   Millard, Ronald W ^e  

^a University of Cincinnati   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary flow reserve (CFR); Coronary stenoses; Fractional flow reserve (FFR); Guidewire diagnostics; Lesion flow coefficient

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VISCOSITY;

CORONARY FLOW RESERVE (CFR); CORONARY STENOSES; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE (FFR); GUIDEWIRE DIAGNOSTICS; LESION FLOW COEFFICIENT;

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EPICARDIUM; FLUID FLOW; GUIDE WIRE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MICROANGIOPATHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VISCOSITY;

BIOMECHANICS; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 33846196264     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Back L.H., and Denton T.A. Some arterial wall shear stress estimates in coronary angioplasty. Advances in Bioengineering ASME BED 22 (1992) 337-340
2. Back L.H., Radbill J.R., and Crawford D.W. Analysis of pulsatile viscous blood flow through diseased coronary arteries of man. Journal of Biomechanics 10 (1977) 339-353
3. Back M.R., White R.A., Kwack E.Y., and Back L.H. Hemodynamic consequences of stenosis remodeling during coronary angioplasty. Angiology 48 (1997) 99-109
4. Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Back M.R., and Cho Y.I. Physiological flow simulation in residual human stenoses after coronary angioplasty. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 122 (2000) 310-320
5. Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., and Cho Y.I. Effect of endovascular diagnostic catheters on human coronary artery lesion flow coefficients. ASME Bioengineering BED 23140 (2001)
6. Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Back M.R., and Cho Y.I. Physiological flow analysis in significant human coronary artery stenoses. Biorheology 40 (2003) 451-476
7. Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., and Back M.R. Effects of diagnostic guidewire catheter presence on translesional hemodynamic measurements across significant coronary artery stenoses. Biorheology 40 (2003) 613-635
8. Baumgart D., Haude M., Goerge G., Ge J., Vetter S., Dagres N., Heusch G., and Erbel R. Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. Circulation 98 (1998) 40-46
9. Bech G.J.W., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., de Muinck E., Hoorntje J.C.A., Escaned J., Stella P.R., Boersma E., Bartunek J., Koolen J.J., and Wijns W. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis. A randomized trial. Circulation 103 (2001) 2928-2934
10. Cho Y.I., Back L.H., Crawford D.W., and Cuffel R.F. Experimental study of pulsatile and steady flow through a smooth tube and an atherosclerotic coronary artery casting of man. Journal of Biomechanics 16 (1983) 933-946
11. De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., Paulus W.J., Vantrimpont P.J., Sys S.U., and Heyndrickx G.R. Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurements in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire. Journal of American College of Cardiology 22 (1993) 119-126
12. De Bruyne B., Bartunek J., Sys S.U., Pijls N.H.J., Heyndrickx G.R., and Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve, Circulation 94 (1996) 1842-1849
13. Di Mario C., de Feyter P.J., Slager C.J., de Jaegere P., Roelandt J.R.T.C., and Serruys P.W. Intracoronary blood flow velocity and transstenotic pressure gradient using sensor-tip pressure and Doppler guidewires: a new technology for the assessment of stenosis severity in the catheterization laboratory. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 28 (1993) 311-319
14. Doriot P., Dorsaz P., Dorsaz I., and Chatelain P. Accuracy of coronary flow measurements performed by means of doppler wires. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 26 (2000) 221-228
15. Doucette J.W., Corl P.D., Payne H.M., Flynn A.E., Goto M.N., Nassi M., and Segal J. Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurements of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 85 (1992) 1899-1911
16. Emanuelsson H., Lamm C., Dohnal M., and Serruys P.W. High fidelity translesional pressure gradients during PTCA-correlation with quantitative coronary angiography. American Heart Journal 71 (1993) 41D-53D
17. Fearon W.F., Nakamura M., Lee D.P., Rezaee M., Vagelos R.H., Hunt S.A., Fitzgerald P.J., Yock P.G., and Yeung A.C. Simultaneous assessment of fractional and coronary flow reserves in cardiac transplant recipients physiologic investigation for transplant arteriopathy (PITA study). Circulation 108 (2003) 1605-1610
18. Gould K.L. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during vasodilation. Circulation Research 43 (1978) 242-253
19. Gould K.L., Lipscomb K., and Hamilton G.W. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. American Journal of Cardiology 33 (1974) 87-94
20. Gould K.L., Kirkeeide R., and Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity, Part 1: relative and absolute coronary flow reserve during changing aortic pressure and cardiac workload; Part II: determination from arteriographic stenosis dimensions under standardized conditions. Journal of American College of Cardiology 15 (1990) 459-474
21. Jasti V., Ivan E., Yalamanchili V., Wongpraparut N., and Leesar M.A. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 110 (2004) 2831-2836
22. Jenni R., Kaufmann P.A., Jiang Z., Attenhofer C., Linka A., and Mandinov L. In vitro validation of volumetric blood flow measurement using doppler flow wire. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 26 (2000) 1301-1310
23. Jenni R., Matthews F., Aschkenasy S.V., Lachat M., Van der loo B., Oechslin E., Namdar M., Jiang Z., and Kaufmann P.A. A novel in vivo procedure for volumetric flow measurements. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 30 (2004) 633-637
24. Kajiya F., Tsujioka K., Ogasawara Y., Wada Y., Matsuoka S., Kanazawa S., Hiramatsu O., Tadaoka S.I., Goto M., and Fujiwara T. Analysis of flow characteristics in post-stenotic regions of the human coronary artery during bypass graft surgery. Circulation 76 (1987) 1092-1100
25. Kern M.J. Coronary physiology revisited: Practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation 101 (2000) 1344-1351
26. Kern M.J., Aguirre F.V., Bach R.G., Caracciolo E.A., and Donohue T.J. Translesional pressure-flow velocity assessment in patients: Part I. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 31 (1994) 49-60
27. Kern M.J., Bach R.G., Mechem C.J., Caracciolo E.A., Aguirre F.V., Miller L.W., and Donohue T.J. Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation, and coronary artery disease. Journal of American College of Cardiology 28 (1996) 1154-1160
28. Kern M.J., De Bruyne B., and Pijls N.H.J. From research to clinical practice: current role of physiologically based decision making in the catheterization laboratory. Journal of American College of Cardiology 30 (1997) 613-620
29. Leesar M.A., Masden R., and Jasti V. Physiological and intravascular ultrasound assessment of an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention 62 (2004) 349-357
30. Meuwissen M., Siebes M., Chamuleau S.A., Tijssen J.G., Spaan J.A., and Piek J.J. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 1 (2003) 471-479
31. Meuwissen M., Siebes M., Chamuleau S.A., van Eck-Smit B.L., Koch K.T., de Winter R.J., Tijssen J.G., Spaan J.A., and Piek J.J. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation 106 (2003) 441-446
32. Pijls N.H.J., van Son J.A., Kirkeeide R.L., De Bruyne B., and Gould K.L. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 86 (1993) 1354-1367
33. Pijls N.H.J., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., Peels K., Bracke F.A., Bonnier H.J., and El Gamal M.I. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92 (1995) 3183-3193
34. Pijls N.H.J., De Bruyne B., Peels K., Van der Voort P., Bonnier H.J.R.M., Bartunek J., and Koolen J.J. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. New England Journal of Medicine 334 (1996) 1703-1708
35. Segal J. Return of Diastolic Predominant Flow Post-PTCA Flow Wire Doppler Guide Wire Case Study (1992), Cardiometrics, Mountain View, CA
36. Segal J., Kern M.J., Scott N.A., King III S.B., Doucette J.W., Heuser R.R., Ofili E., and Siegel R. Alterations of phasic coronary artery flow velocity in humans during percautaneous coronary angioplasty. Journal of American College of Cardiology 20 (1992) 276-286
37. Siebes M., Verhoeff B.J., Meuwissen M., de Winter R.J., Spaan J.A., and Piek J.J. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 109 (2004) 756-762
38. Sinha Roy A., Banerjee R.K., Back L.H., Back M.R., Khoury S.F., and Millard R.W. Delineating the guidewire flow obstruction effect in assessment of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve measurements. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology 289 (2005) H392-H397
39. Sinha Roy A., Back L.H., and Banerjee R.K. Guidewire flow obstruction effect on pressure drop- flow relationship in moderate coronary artery stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 39 (2006) 853-864
40. Takagi A., Tsurumi Y., Ishii Y., Suzuki K., Kawana M., and Kasanuki H. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis. Relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Circulation 100 (1999) 250-255
41. Verhoeff B.J., Siebes M., Meuwissen M., Atasever B., Voskuil M., de Winter R.J., Koch K.T., Tijssen J.G., Spaan J.A., and Piek J.J. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Circulation 111 (2005) 76-82
42. Young D.F., Cholvin N.R., and Roth A.C. Pressure drop across artificially induced stenoses in the femoral arteries of dogs. Circulation Research 36 (1975) 735-743
43. Young D.F., and Tsai F.Y. Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses. I. Steady flow. Journal of Biomechanics 6 (1973) 395-410
44. Young D.F., and Tsai F.Y. Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenoses. II. Unsteady flow. Journal of Biomechanics 6 (1973) 547-559
45. Webb C.M., Collins P., and Di Mario C. Normal coronary physiology assessed by intracoronary doppler ultrasound. Herz 30 (2005) 8-16
46. Wilson R.F., Johnson M.R., Marcus M.L., Alyward P.E.G., Skorton D.J., Collins S., and White C.W. The effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 77 (1988) 873-885
47. Wilson R.F., and Laxson D.D. Caveat emptor: a clinician's guide to assessing the physiologic significance of arterial stenoses. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 29 (1993) 93-98