Evaluating efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from a generalised conditional efficiency model for public libraries

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 319-327

  Witte, Kristof De ^a,b   Geys, Benny ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^d WZB BERLIN SOCIAL SCIENCE CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional efficiency; Libraries; Local government; Nonparametric estimation; Public good provision

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952006510     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alchian A.A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs and economic organisation. American Economic Review 1972, 62:777-795.
2. Alford J. Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory. Administration and Society 2002, 34(1):32-56.
3. Ashworth J., Johnson P. Sources of 'value for money' for museum visitors: some survey evidence. Journal of Cultural Economics 1996, 20(1):67-83.
4. Battese G.E., Coelli T.J. A model for technical efficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function with panel data. Empirical Economics 1995, 20:325-332.
5. Becker G.S. A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 1965, 75:493-517.
6. Bhatt R. The impact of public library use on reading, television, and academic outcomes. Journal of Urban Economics 2010, 68(2):148-166.
7. Bookstein A. An economic model of library service. Library Quarterly 1981, 51:410-428.
8. Borge L.-E., Falch T., Tovmo P. Public sector efficiency: the impact of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity and democratic participation. Public Choice 2008, 136:475-495.
9. Boter J., Rouwendal J., Wedel M. Employing travel time to compare the value of competing cultural organizations. Journal of Cultural Economics 2005, 29(1):19-33.
10. Brueckner J. Property values, local public expenditure and economic efficiency. Journal of Public Economics 1979, 11:223-245.
11. Brueckner J. Congested public goods: the case of fire protection. Journal of Public Economics 1981, 15:45-58.
12. Brueckner J. A test for allocative effficiency in the local public good sector. Journal of Public Economics 1982, 19:311-331.
13. Brueckner J. Property value maximisation and public sector efficiency. Journal of Urban Economics 1983, 14:1-15.
14. Buelens J., Rihoux B., Deschouwer K. Tussen Kiezer en Hoofdkwartier - De Lokale Partijafdelingen en de Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen Van 2006 2008, VUBPress, Brussel.
15. Cazals C., Florens J.P., Simar L. Nonparametric Frontier estimation: a robust approach. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 106(1):1-25.
16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2(6):428-449.
17. Chattopadhyay R., Duflo E. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 2004, 72(5):1409-1443.
18. Cherchye L., Kuosmanen T., Post T. What is the economic meaning of FDH? A reply to thrall. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 13:263-267.
19. Cordero-Ferrera J.M., Pedraja-Chaparro F., Salinas-Jimé nez J. Measuring efficiency in education: an analysis of different approaches for incorporating non-discretionary inputs. Applied Economics 2008, 40:1323-1339.
20. Daraio C., Simar L. Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2005, 24(1):93-121.
21. Daraio C., Simar L. Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis. Methodology and Applications. Series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency 2007, Springer, Heidelberg.
22. De Borger B., Kerstens K., Moesen W., Vanneste J. Explaining differences in productive efficiency: an application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice 1994, 80:339-358.
23. De Borger B., Kerstens K. What is known about municipal efficiency? The Belgian case and beyond. Public Provision and Performance: Contributions from Efficiency and Productivity Measurement 2000, 299-330. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J. Blank (Ed.).
24. De Graaff T., Boter J., Rouwendal J. On spatial differences in attractiveness of Dutch museums. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(11):2778-2797.
25. Deprins D., Simar L., Tulkens H. Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurements 1984, 243-267. North-Holland, Amsterdam. M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, H. Tulkens (Eds.).
26. De Witte, K., Geys, B., 2010. Citizen Coproduction and the Evaluation of Efficient Public Good Provision: Theory and Evidence from Local Public Libraries. Mimeo, WZB, Berlin.
27. De Witte, K., Kortelainen, M., 2008. Blaming the exogenous environment? Conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables. CES Discussion Paper Series DPS 08.33; MPRA Paper 14034.
28. Dickinson D., Villeval M.-C. Does monitoring decrease work effort? The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games and Economic Behavior 2008, 63:56-76.
29. Dunn W.N. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
30. Edlund L., Pande R. Why have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2002, 117(3):917-961.
31. Frantz R. X-Inefficiency and allocative efficiency: what have we learned?. American Economic Review 1992, 82(2):434-438.
32. Fried H., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt S. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Geys B. Looking across borders: a test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics 2006, 60(3):443-462.
34. Geys B., Heinemann F., Kalb A. Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: evidence from German municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy 2010, 26(2):265-278.
35. Geys B., Moesen W. Sources of local government technical efficiency: evidence from Flemish municipalities. Public Finance and Management 2009, 9(1):1-29.
36. Geys, B., Revelli, F., 2009. Decentralization, Competition and the Local Tax Mix: Evidence from Flanders. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, accepted for publication.
37. Geys B., Vermeir J. Taxation and presidential approval: separate effects from tax burden and tax structure turbulence?. Public Choice 2008, 135(3-4):301-317.
38. Geys B., Vermeir J. The political cost of taxation: new evidence from German popularity ratings. Electoral Studies 2008, 27(4):633-648.
39. Grossman G., Helpman E. Special Interest Politics 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge.
40. Hammond C.J. Efficiency in the provision of public services: a data envelopment analysis of UK public library systems. Applied Economics 2002, 34(5):649-657.
41. Hasenkamp G. A study of multiple-output production functions. Journal of Econometrics 1976, 4:253-262.
42. Hemmeter J.A. Estimating public library efficiency using stochastic frontiers. Public Finance Review 2006, 34(3):328-348.
43. Hibbs D. Political parties and macro-economic policy. American Political Science Review 1977, 71:1467-1487.
44. Hochman O. Congestable local public goods in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Economics 1982, 11(3):290-310.
45. Holmström B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 1979, 10(1):74-91.
46. Hoxby C. The productivity of schools and other local public goods producers. Journal of Public Economics 1999, 74:1-30.
47. Hoxby C. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers?. American Economic Review 2000, 90(5):1209-1238.
48. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. The theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3(4):305-360.
49. John P. Local Governance in Western Europe 2001, Sage, London.
50. Kiser L.L. Toward an institutional theory of citizen coproduction. Urban Affairs Quarterly 1984, 19(4):485-510.
51. Kneip A., Park B., Simar L. A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econometric Theory 1998, 14:783-793.
52. Kumbhakar S.C., Gosh S., McGuckin J.T. A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy firms. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1991, 9(3):279-286.
53. Koopmans T.C. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation 1951, John Wiley, New York.
54. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74(2):132-157.
55. Leibenstein H. Allocative efficiency vs. X-inefficiency. American Economic Review 1966, 56(3):392-415.
56. Lott J.R., Kenny L.W. Did women's suffrage change the size and scope of government?. Journal of Political Economy 1999, 107:1163-1198.
57. McConnell K.E. Congestion and willingness to pay: a study of beach use. Land Economics 1977, 53(2):185-195.
58. Menz F.C., Mullen J.K. Expected encounters and willingnes to pay for outdoor recreation. Land Economics 1981, 57(1):33-40.
59. Mitlin D. With and beyond the state: co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 2008, 20(2):339-360.
60. Mueller D.C., Murrell P. Interest groups and the size of government. Public Choice 1986, 48:125-146.
61. Musgrave R.M. The Theory of Public Finance 1959, McGraw-Hill, New York.
62. Nagin D.S., Rebitzer J.B., Sanders S., Taylor L.J. Monitoring, motivation and management: the determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. American Economic Review 2002, 92(4):850-873.
63. Noonan D.S. Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 2003, 27(3-4):159-176.
64. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism 1972, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
65. Oates W.E. On the measurement of congestion in the provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics 1988, 24(1):85-94.
66. Olson M. The principle of 'fiscal equivalence': the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review 1969, 59:479-487.
67. Parks R.B., Baker P.C., Kiser L., Oakerson R., Ostrom E., Ostrom V., Percy S.L., Vandivort M.B., Whitaker G.P., Wilson R. Consumers and coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal 1981, 9(7):1001-1011.
68. Parry T.R. Will pursuit of higher quality sacrifice equal opportunity in higher education? An analysis of the education voucher system in Santiago. Social Science Quarterly 1996, 77(4):821-841.
69. Percy S.L. Citizen participation in the coproduction of urban services. Urban Affairs Quarterly 1984, 19(4):431-446.
70. Reifschneider D., Stevenson R. Systematic departures from the frontier: a framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. International Economic Review 1991, 32(3):715-723.
71. Schulze G.G., Ursprung H.W. La Donna e mobile - or is she? Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice 2000, 102:129-147.
72. Svaleryd H. Women's representation and public spending. European Journal of Political Economy 2009, 25(2):186-198.
73. Tang K.-L. Efficiency in the private sector: a critical review of empirical evidence from public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences 1997, 63:459-474.
74. Throsby C.D. The production and consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature 1994, 32:1-29.
75. Verhoeff R. Explaining differences in the geographical reach of performances. Journal of Cultural Economics 1992, 16(2):73-82.
76. Werck K., Heyndels B., Geys B. The impact of 'central places' on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures. Journal of Cultural Economics 2008, 32(1):35-58.
77. Whitaker G. Co-production: citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review 1980, 40:240-246.
78. Worthington A.C. An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics 2001, 9(3):245-268.