Measures of Phonological Typicality: Robust coherence and psychological validity

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 281-299

  Monaghan, Padraic ^a   Christiansen, Morten H ^a   Farmer, Tomas A ^a   Fitneva, Stanka A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Lexical categories; Lexical decision; Modularity; Sentence processing; Word naming

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951988785     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.5.3.02mon     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baayen, R. H., Pipenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania,.
2. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2005). Phoneme similarity (Pubitemid 40382352)
3. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Pilotti, M. (1999). Item-level analyses of lexical decision performance: Results from a mega-study. In Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society (p. 44). Los Angeles, CA: Psychonomic Society.
4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yapp, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition for single syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316. (Pubitemid 38707135)
5. Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Brooks, P. J., Sudhalter, V., Ross, J. A., Catalano, L., et al. (1990). Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 591-610.
6. Brooks, P. B., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 79-95.
7. Cassidy, K. W., & Kelly, M. H. (2001). Children's use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8 (3), 519-523. (Pubitemid 33604202)
8. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 2, 133-142.
10. Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkanen, L. (2010). Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21, 629-634.
11. Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (2001). Predicting grammatical classes from phonological cues: An empirical test. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 189-229). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 12203-12208. (Pubitemid 44215835)
13. Farmer, T. A., Monaghan, P., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H., (2009). Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: A reply to Staub et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, in press.
14. Fitneva, S., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2009). From sound to syntax: Phonological constraints on children's lexical categorization of new words. Journal of Child Language, 36, 967-997.
15. Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 437-468.
16. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
17. Hockett, C. F. (1963) The problem of universals in language. In Greenberg, J. H. (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 1-29). Bradford: MIT Press.
18. Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349-364.
19. Kelly, M. H., & Bock, J. K. (1988) Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 389-403.
20. Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223-232. (Pubitemid 29261901)
21. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
22. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2003). Inequality between the classes: Phonological and distributional typicality as predictors of lexical processing. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition, 96, 143-182. (Pubitemid 40733604)
24. Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007). The Phonological Distributional coherence Hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 259-305.
25. Morgan J. L., Shi R., & Allopenna P. (1996) Perceptual bases of rudimentary grammatical categories: Toward a broader conceptualization of bootstrapping. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 263-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Onnis, L., & Christiansen, M. H. (2008). Lexical categories at the edge of the word. Cognitive Science, 32, 184-221.
27. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
28. Staub, A., Grant, M., Clifton, C., & Rayner, K. (2009). Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35 (3), 806-814.
29. St Clair, M. C., & Monaghan, P. (2005). Categorizing grammar: Differential effects of preceding and succeeding contextual cues. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Hare, M. (2007). Phonological typicality and sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (3), 93-95.
31. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new meaure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971-979.