Resistance to fracture of mandibular premolars restored using post-and-core systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 49-57

  Massa, Fernando ^a   Dias, Caroline ^b   Blos, Carlos Eduardo ^c  

^a Caxias do Sul ^*  (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resin core; Endodontically treated teeth; Ferrule; Post and core

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INJURY; MANDIBLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; QUARTZ; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 79951973365     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with postcores and crowns.Dent Mater 2006;22:477-485.
2. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth.J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-784.
3. Tjan AH, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:496-500.
4. Milot P, Stein S. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:428-435.
5. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AGM, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-39.
6. Pereira JR, Ornellas F, Conti PCR, Valle AL. Effect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:50-54.
7. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-363.
8. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-567.
9. Nissan J, Barnea E, Bar-Hen D, Assif D.Effect of remaining coronal structure on the resistance to fracture of crowned endodontically treated maxillary first premolars. Quintessence Int 2008;39:183-187.
10. Joshi S, Mukherjee A, Kheur M, Mehta A.Mechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth. Finite Elem Anal Design 2001;37:587-601.
11. Escribano AB, Bru JLS, Navarro LF, Cervantes PJR, González AP, Marín FTS. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: Fractured strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006;31:47-54.
12. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-437.
13. Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:45-50.
14. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-116.
15. Scotti R, Ferrari M. Pinos de fibra-Considerações teóricas e aplicações clínicas. São Paulo: Editora Artes Médicas, 2003.
16. Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:380-386.
17. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:11-16.
18. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbonfiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532.
19. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-424.
20. Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts, metal posts and composite resins. J Endod 1999;25:789-794.
21. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-491.
22. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth:Application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-380.
23. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M.Coronoradicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:442-448.
24. Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Dugoni J. Threaded endodontic dowels: Effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:179-187.
25. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post designs on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
26. Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988;16:15-22.
27. Plasmans PJJM, Welle PR, Vrijhoef MMA. In vitro resistance of composite resin dowel and cores. J Endod 1988;14:300-304.
28. Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:973-986.
29. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-161.
30. Tan PLB, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:331-336.
31. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177-181.
32. Nissan J, Barnea E, Carmon D, Gross M, Assif D. Effect of reduced post length on the resistance to fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth. Quintessence Int 2008;39:179-182.
33. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Dalla Libera S. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-andcore designs cemented with two different cements:An in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003;34:301-306.
34. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
35. Ukon S, Moroi H, Okimoto K, et al. Influence of different elastic moduli of dowel and core on stress distribution in root.Dent Mater J 2000;19:50-64.
36. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:611-619.
37. Gegauff AG.Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:169-179.
38. Anusavice KJ. Phillips-Materiais Dentários, ed 11. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2005.
39. Mendonza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:10-15.
40. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:631-636.