Recommendations for the use of e-tools for improvements around assignment marking quality

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 469-479

  Heinrich, Eva ^a   Milne, John ^a   Ramsay, Annabel ^a   Morrison, David ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Assessment; Assignments; E learning tools; Feedback; Quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951931514     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930802071122     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Barrett, C., and J. Luca. 2002. Open online assessment: Keeping the tutors honest! Paper presented at the 20th ASCILITE Conference - Winds of Change in the Sea of Learning: Charting the Course of Digital Education, Auckland.
2. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5: 7-74.
3. Buzzetto-More, N.A., and A.J. Alade. 2006. Best practices in e-assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education 5: 251-69.
4. Crooks, T.J. 1988. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research 58: 438-81.
5. Davies, P. 2002. Using student reflective self-assessment for awarding degree classifications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39, no. 4: 307-19.
6. Denton, P. 2003. Evaluation of the 'electronic feedback' marking assistant and analysis of a novel collusion detection facility. Paper presented at the 7th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Loughborough.
7. Downton, A. 2006. Online coursework submission from pilot to university-wide implementation: Rationale, challenges and further development. Paper presented at the 10th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Loughborough.
8. Edwards, K.I., E. Fernandez, T.M. Milionis, and D.M. Williamson. 2002. EAST: Developing an electronic assessment and storage tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 1: 95-104.
9. Freeman, M., and J. McKenzie. 2002. SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology 33, no. 5: 551-69.
10. Gronlund, N.E. 2006. Assessment of student achievement. Boston, MA: Pearson.
11. Hanna, G.S., and P.A. Dettmer. 2004. Assessment for effective teaching using context-adaptive planning. New York: Pearson.
12. Hattie, J. 1999. Influences on student learning. Inaugural professorial lecture. University of Auckland, Auckland.
13. Heinrich, E. 2006. Interpretation of results of the survey 'e-learning tools in support of marking and management of essay-type assignments'. http://www-ist.massey.ac.nz/marktool/survey/SurveyInterpretation.pdf.
14. Linn, R.L., and M.D. Miller. 2005. Measurement and assessment in teaching. Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
15. McLachlan-Smith, C., and B. Irons. 1998. Ideas to share: Examples of successful extramural study guide design. Palmerston North: Massey University.
16. Nicol, D.J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 2: 199-218.
17. Nitko, A.J. 2004. Educational assessment outcomes. Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
18. Sadler, D.R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18: 119-44.
19. Sim, G., P. Holifield, and M. Brown. 2004. Implementation of computer-assisted assessment: Lessons from the literature. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology 12, no. 3: 215-29.
20. Warburton, B. 2006. Quick win or slow burn? Modelling UK HE CAA uptake. Paper presented at the 10th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, Loughborough.
21. Weaver, D., C.S. Nair, and C. Spratt. 2005. Evaluation: WebCT and the student experience. Paper presented at the Making a Difference: 2005 Evaluations and Assessment Conference, Sydney.