The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: The quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 5537-5545

  McAlinden, Colm ^a   Pesudovs, Konrad ^b   Moore, Jonathan E ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c ROYAL GROUP OF HOSPITALS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTACT LENS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYE DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; KERATOMILEUSIS; LASER EPITHELIAL KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF VISION QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RASCH ANALYSIS; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPECTACLES; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; CONTACT LENSES; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATECTOMY, SUBEPITHELIAL, LASER-ASSISTED; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; VISION TESTS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951917302     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. McGhee CN, Craig JP, Sachdev N, Weed KH, Brown AD. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26: 497-509.
2. Sakimoto T, Rosenblatt MI, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors. Lancet. 2006;367:1432-1447.
3. O'Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW, Smith SE, Kerr-Muir MG, Marshall J. Night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: haze and halos. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1994;4:43-51.
4. O'Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW, et al. Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye (Lond). 1994;8:46-51.
5. Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:992-997.
6. Lohmann CP, Fitzke F, O'Brart D, Muir MK, Timberlake G, Marshall J. Corneal light scattering and visual performance in myopic individuals with spectacles, contact lenses, or excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:444-453.
7. Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW, O'Brart D, Muir MK, Marshall J. Halos-a problem for all myopes?-a comparison between spectacles, contact lenses, and photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:S72-S75.
8. Rubin ML. Spectacles: past, present, and future. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986;30:321-327.
9. Alio JL, Schimchak P, Negri HP, Montes-Mico R. Crystalline lens optical dysfunction through aging. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 2022-2029.
10. Fraenkel G, Comaish F, Lawless MA, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess subjective vision score in myopes seeking refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:10-19.
11. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, Boisjoly H, Makni H. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. part 1: Development and validation of a survey questionnaire. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1783-1789.
12. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy, part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1790-1796.
13. Schein OD. The measurement of patient-reported outcomes of refractive surgery: the refractive status and vision profile. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:439-469.
14. Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, McDonnell PJ. Psychometric properties of the national eye institute- refractive error quality of life instrument. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2292-2301.
15. Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, Elliott DB. The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84:663-674.
16. Townsend JT, Ashby FG. Measurement scales and statistics: the misconception misconceived. Psychol Bull. 1984;96:394-401.
17. Massof RW. The measurement of vision disability. OptomVisSci. 2002;79:516-552.
18. Pesudovs K. Patient-centered measurement in ophthalmology: a paradigm shift. BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6:25.
19. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70:857-860.
20. Fisher WP Jr, Eubanks RL, Marier RL. Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI physical functioning scales. J Outcome Meas. 1997; 1:329-362.
21. Norquist JM, Fitzpatrick R, Dawson J, Jenkinson C. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care. 2004;42:I25-I36.
22. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
23. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:769-777.
24. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The contact lens impact on quality of life (CLIQ) questionnaire: development and validation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2789-2796.
25. Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Gibson GA, Shah S. Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007; 30:134-143.
26. Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. Measurement of ocular surface irritation on a linear interval scale with the ocular comfort index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4451-4458.
27. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, Elliott DB. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 2892-2899.
28. Pesudovs K, Caudle LE, Rees G, Lamoureux EL. Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:925-933.
29. Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K, Pallant JF, et al. An evaluation of the 10-item vision core measure 1 (VCM1) scale (the core module of the vision-related quality of life scale) using Rasch analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008;15:224-233.
30. Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K, Thumboo J, Saw SM, Wong TY. An evaluation of the reliability and validity of the visual functioning questionnaire (VF-11) using Rasch analysis in an Asian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2607-2613.
31. Lundstrom M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: Nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest Questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:504-513.
32. Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright TA. Visual disability assessment: valid measurement of activity limitation and mobility in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:777-781.
33. Gothwal VK, Wright T, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. Psychometric properties of visual functioning index using Rasch analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. Published online June 26, 2009.
34. Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. Using Rasch analysis to revisit the validity of the cataract TyPE spec instrument for measuring cataract surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg.2009;35:1509-1517.
35. Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. The impact of cataract surgery questionnaire: re-evaluation using Rasch analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. Published online October 30, 2009.
36. Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. Cataract symptom score questionnaire: Rasch revalidation. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16:296-303.
37. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.
38. Thomee R, Grimby G, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Rasch analysis of visual analog scale measurements before and after treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome in women. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:145-151.
39. Andrich D. A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43:561-573.
40. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
41. Wright BD. Local dependency, correlations and principal components. Rasch Meas Trans. 1996;10:509-511.
42. Linacre JM. A User's Guide to WINSTEPS. Winsteps.Com 2009.
43. Mallinson T. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:675-682.
44. Holland PW, Wainer H. Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993.
45. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990;20:337-340.
46. British Standards Institution. Precision of Test Methods. 1: Guide for the Determination and Reproducibility of a Standard Test Method (BS5497, part 1). London: BSI; 1979.
47. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL 3rd, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the united states, 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1111-1119.
48. Pop M, Payette Y. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:3-10.
49. Uusitalo RJ, Aine E, Sen NH, Laatikainen L. Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:29-36.
50. Leyland M, Pringle E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD003169.
51. Margrain TH, Owen C. The misting characteristics of spectacle lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:108-114.
52. Jethmalani J, Chomyn J, Abdel-Sadek G, et al. Wavefront guided spectacle lenses for emmetropes and myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2764.
53. Lopez-Gil N, Castejon-Mochon JF, Benito A, et al. Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S603-S609.
54. McAlinden C, Moore JE. Higher order aberrations using the NIDEK OPD-scan and AMO WaveScan. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:605-608.
55. McAlinden C, Moore JE. Comparison of higher order aberrations after LASIK and LASEK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:45-51.
56. Pesudovs K. Item banking: a generational change in patient-reported outcome measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(4):285-293.