The catheterization laboratory and interventional vascular suite of the future: Anticipating innovations in design and function

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 447-455

  Klein, Lloyd W ^a   Miller, Donald L ^b   Goldstein, James ^c   Haines, David ^c   Balter, Stephen ^d   Fairobent, Lynne ^e   Norbash, Alexander ^f  

^a RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences   (United States)

^c BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Department of Medicine   (United States)

^e American Association of Physicists in Medicine   (United States)

^f BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cath lab design; imaging; integration; occupational health; robotics

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA SURGERY; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BLOOD VOLUME; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CATHETERIZATION; CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPETITION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HEART DISEASE; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HOSPITAL BILLING; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITAL DESIGN; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HOSPITAL LABORATORY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL PURCHASING; HOSPITAL RUNNING COST; HOSPITALIZATION COST; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL VASCULAR SUITE; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; INVENTORY CONTROL; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATENT FORAMEN OVALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SCHEDULING; REIMBURSEMENT; ROBOTICS; SCINTIANGIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URBAN AREA; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

CATHETERIZATION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; MINIATURIZATION; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79951878560     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22872     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Miller DL, Klein LW, Balter S, Norbash A, Haines D, Fairobent L, Goldstein JA,; on behalf of the members of the Multispecialty Occupational Health Group. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: Progress report of the Multispecialty Occupational Health Group. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 1338-1341.
2. Helfant RH, Klein LW, Agarwal JB,. Role of cardiac testing in an era of proliferating technology and cost containment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 1194-1198. (Pubitemid 17065783)
3. Holmes DR Jr, Schwartz RS,. Left atrial appendage occlusion eliminates the need for warfarin. Circulation 2009; 120: 1919-1926.
4. Goldstein JA,. Coronary intervention with miniaturized guiding systems: Is smaller necessarily better? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 989-990.
5. Waksman R,. Coating bioabsorbtion on chronic bare metal scaffolding versus fully bioabsorbable stent. EuroIntervention 2009; 5 (Suppl F): F36-F42.
6. Yamasaki M, Ako J, Honda Y, Hassan A, Koo B, Abizaid A, Fitzgerald P, Whitbourn R,. Novel guidewire-based stent delivery system: Examination by intravascular ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 47-51. (Pubitemid 352008981)
7. Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Alavi A,. The clinical role of fusion imaging using PET, CT, and MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 133-149.
8. Lemoine P, Gutierrez M, Vexo F, Thalmann D,. Mediators: Virtual interfaces with haptic feedback. Available at: Accessed 2/19/10.
9. Riga C, Bicknell C, Cheshire N, Hamady M,. Initial clinical application of a robotically steerable catheter system in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2009; 16: 149-153.
10. Klein LW,. Computerized patient simulation to train the next generation of interventional cardiologists. Can virtual reality really take the place of real life? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51: 528.
11. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies. I. Circulation 2003; 108: 1664-1672. (Pubitemid 37243650)
12. Klein LW,. Atherosclerosis regression, vascular remodeling and plaque stabilization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 271-273.
13. Phinikaridou A, Ruberg FL, Hallock KJ, Qiao Y, Hua N, Viereck JC, Hamilton JA,. In vivo detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque by magnetic resonance imaging in a rabbit model. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 323-332.
14. Jang IK, Tearney GJ, MacNeil B, et al. In vivo characterization of coronary atherosceloric plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2005; 111: 1551-1555. (Pubitemid 40470652)
15. Hetterich H, Redel T, Lauritsch G, Rohkohl C, Rieber J,. New X-ray imaging modalities and their integration with intravascular imaging and interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26: 797-808.
16. Larose E, Yeghiazarians Y, Libby P, et al. Characterization of human atherosclerotic plaques by intravascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005; 112: 2324-2331. (Pubitemid 41464576)
17. Rasche V, Gijsbers G,. Cardiology: Trends and developments. MedicaMundi 2003; 47: 1-7.
18. Jaffer FA, Libby P, Weissleder R,. Optical and multimodality molecular imaging: Insights into atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29: 1017-1024.
19. Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, Glaiberman C, Binkert CA, Orth RC, Soulez G,. Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: Applications in the interventional suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 799-813.
20. Uppot RN, Silverman SG, Zagoria RJ, Tuncali K, Childs DD, Gervais DA,. Imaging-guided percutaneous ablation of renal cell carcinoma: A primer of how we do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1558-1570.
21. Ong L, Hajj-Ali R, Marchant D, Green S, Katz S,. Reduction in operator X-ray exposure using a digital flat panel imaging system. JACC 2001; 37: 5A-32A.
22. Kpodonu J, Raney A,. The cardiovascular hybrid room a key component for hybrid interventions and image guided surgery in the emerging specialty of cardiovascular hybrid surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9: 688-692.
23. Nabavi A, Dorner L, Stark AM, Mehdorn HM,. Intraoperative MRI with 1.5 tesla in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009; 20: 163-171.
24. Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, Laskey W, Haines D, Mauro MA, Goldstein JA,; on behalf of the members of the Joint Inter-Society Task Force on Occupational Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. Radiology 2009; 250: 538-544
25. Safety in Medical Imaging Procedures. Available at:. Accessed 3/22/10.
26. Klein LW,. How appropriate for assessing quality are the 2009 appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization? J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21: 558-562.
27. Gavit L, Carlier S, Hayase M, Burkhoff D, Leon M,. The evolving role of coronary angiography and fluoroscopy in cardiac diagnosis and intervention. EuroIntervention 2007; 2: 526-532.
28. Al-Ahmad A, Grossman JD, Wang PJ,. Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system. J Int Card Electrophysiol 2005; 12: 199-202. (Pubitemid 41201693)
29. Weese J, Peters J, Meyer C, et al. Patient-specific heart models for diagnosis and interventions. MedicaMundi 2009; 53: 72-78.