Quantification of cartilage loss in local regions of knee joints using semi-automated segmentation software: Analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 309-314

  Iranpour Boroujeni, T ^a   Watanabe, A ^a   Bashtar, R ^a   Yoshioka, H ^a   Duryea, J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Knee osteoarthritis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Software segmentation; Three dimensional registration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CARTILAGE DEGENERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE JOINT; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79951855245     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arden N., Nevitt M.C. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006, 20:3-25.
2. Elders M.J. The increasing impact of arthritis on public health. J Rheumatol Suppl 2000, 60:6-8.
3. Eckstein F., Charles H.C., Buck R.J., Kraus V.B., Remmers A.E., Hudelmaier M., et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:3132-3136.
4. Eckstein F., Westhoff J., Sittek H., Maag K.P., Haubner M., Faber S., et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 170:593-597.
5. Graichen H., von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Vogl T., Englmeier K.H., Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:811-816.
6. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Berthiaume M.J., Beaudoin G., Choquette D., Haraoui B., et al. Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. Arthritis Res Ther 2006, 8:R21.
7. Peterfy C.G., Guermazi A., Zaim S., Tirman P.F., Miaux Y., White D., et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:177-190.
8. Hunter D.J., Lo G.H., Gale D., Grainger A.J., Guermazi A., Conaghan P.G. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:206-211.
9. Kornaat P.R., Ceulemans R.Y., Kroon H.M., Riyazi N., Kloppenburg M., Carter W.O., et al. MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS) - inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system. Skeletal Radiol 2005, 34:95-102.
10. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Berthiaume M.J., Labonte F., Beaudoin G., de Guise J.A., et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:476-487.
11. Eckstein F., Buck R.J., Burstein D., Charles H.C., Crim J., Hudelmaier M., et al. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:1683-1688.
12. McWalter E.J., Wirth W., Siebert M., von Eisenhart-Rothe R.M., Hudelmaier M., Wilson D.R., et al. Use of novel interactive input devices for segmentation of articular cartilage from magnetic resonance images. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13:48-53.
13. Hunter D.J., March L., Sambrook P.N. The association of cartilage volume with knee pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11:725-729.
14. Eckstein F., Schnier M., Haubner M., Priebsch J., Glaser C., Englmeier K.H., et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 352:137-148.
15. Piplani M.A., Disler D.G., McCauley T.R., Holmes T.J., Cousins J.P. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology 1996, 198:855-859.
16. Folkesson J., Dam E., Olsen O.F., Pettersen P., Christiansen C. Automatic segmentation of the articular cartilage in knee MRI using a hierarchical multi-class classification scheme. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005, 8:327-334.
17. Stammberger T., Eckstein F., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M. Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Magn Reson Med 1999, 41:529-536.
18. Eckstein F., Stammberger T., Priebsch J., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M. Effect of gradient and section orientation on quantitative analysis of knee joint cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 11:469-470.
19. Cicuttini F., Forbes A., Morris K., Darling S., Bailey M., Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999, 7:265-271.
20. Kshirsagar A.A., Watson P.J., Tyler J.A., Hall L.D. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiol 1998, 33:289-299.
21. Peterfy C.G., van Dijke C.F., Janzen D.L., Glüer C.C., Namba R., Majumdar S., et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994, 192:485-491.
22. Solloway S., Hutchinson C.E., Waterton J.C., Taylor C.J. The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images. Magn Reson Med 1997, 37:943-952.
23. Raynauld J.P., Kauffmann C., Beaudoin G., Berthiaume M.J., de Guise J.A., Bloch D.A., et al. Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003, 11:351-360.
24. Pelletier J.P., Raynauld J.P., Berthiaume M.J., Abram F., Choquette D., Haraoui B., et al. Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther 2007, 9:R74.
25. Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Buck R.J., Wyman B.T., Vignon E., Mazzuca S.A., Brandt K.D., et al. Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women - comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:1177-1185.
26. Wirth W., Eckstein F. A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27:737-744.
27. Hunter D.J., Niu J., Zhang Y., Totterman S., Tamez J., Dabrowski C., et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:349-356.
28. Cicuttini F.M., Wluka A.E., Wang Y., Stuckey S.L. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:94-97.
29. Bruyere O., Genant H., Kothari M., Zaim S., White D., Peterfy C., et al. Longitudinal study of magnetic resonance imaging and standard X-rays to assess disease progression in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:98-103.
30. Eckstein F., Cicuttini F., Raynauld J.P., Waterton J.C., Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14(Suppl A):A46-A75.
31. Duryea J., Neumann G., Brem M.H., Koh W., Noorbakhsh F., Jackson R.D., et al. Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:487-492.
32. Folkesson J., Dam E.B., Olsen O.F., Pettersen P.C., Christiansen C. Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26:106-115.
33. Kass M., Witkin A., Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988, 1:321-331.
34. Lynch J.A., Zaim S., Zhao J., Stork A., Peterfy C.G., Genent H.K. Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours. SPIE Proc Ser 2000, 3979:925-935.
35. Brem M.H., Lang P., Neumann G., Schlechtweg P.M., Schneider E., Jackson R., et al. Magnetic resonance image segmentation using semi-automated software for quantification of knee articular cartilage - initial evaluation of a technique for paired scans. Skeletal Radiol 2009, 38:505-511.
36. Wirth W., Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Wyman B.T., Maschek S., Hudelmaier M., Hitzl W., et al. Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:291-297.
37. Buck R.J., Wyman B.T., Le Graverand M.P., Hudelmaier M., Wirth W., Eckstein F. Does the use of ordered values of subregional change in cartilage thickness improve the detection of disease progression in longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2009, 61:917-924.
38. Duryea J., Magalnick M., Alli S., Yao L., Wilson M., Goldbach-Mansky R. Semiautomated three-dimensional segmentation software to quantify carpal bone volume changes on wrist CT scans for arthritis assessment. Med Phys 2008, 35:2321-2330.
39. Summers G.C., Merrill A., Sharif M., Adams M.A. Swelling of articular cartilage depends on the integrity of adjacent cartilage and bone. Biorheology 2008, 45:365-374.