Design space and evaluation challenges of adaptive graphical user interfaces

AI Magazine

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 68-73

  Findlater, Leah ^a   Gajos, Krzysztof Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USER INTERFACES;

ADAPTIVE INTERACTION; EVALUATION MEASURES; EVALUATION RESULTS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUIS); IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS; USER CHARACTERISTICS; USER SATISFACTION;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 79951828006     PISSN: 07384602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2268     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bridle, R., and McCreath, E. 2006. Inducing Shortcuts on a Mobile Phone Interface. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 327-329. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
2. Bunt, A.; Conati, C.; and McGrenere, J. A Mixed-Initiative Approach to Interface Personalization. AI Magazine 30(4).
3. Cockbum, A.; Gutwin, C.; and Greenberg, S. 2007. A Predictive Model of Menu Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07), 627-636. New York: Association for Computing Machinery
4. Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. 2004. A Comparison of Static, Adaptive and Adaptable Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'04), 89-96. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
5. Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. 2007. Evaluating Reduced-Functionality Interfaces According to Feature Findability and Awareness. In Proceedings of IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 592-605. Berlin: Springer.
6. Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. 2008. Impact of Screen Size on Performance, Awareness, and User Satisfaction with Adaptive Graphical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 1247-1256. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
7. Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. 2009. Beyond Performance: Feature Awareness in Personalized Interfaces. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. In press.
8. Findlater, L.; Moffatt, K.; McGrenere, J.; and Dawson, J., 2009. Ephemeral Adaptation: The Use of Gradual Onset to Improve Menu Delection Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHT09), 1655-1664. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
9. Gajos, K. Z.; Czerwinski, M.; Tan, D. S.; and Weld, D. S. 2006. Exploring the Design Space for Adaptive Graphical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI'06), 201-208. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
10. Gajos, K. Z.; Everitt, K.; Tan, D.S.; Czerwinski, M.; and Weld, D.S. 2008. Predictability and Accuracy in Adaptive User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 1271-1274. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
11. Gajos, K. Z.; Wobbrock, J. O.; and Weld, D. S. 2008. Improving the Performance of Motor-Impaired Users with AutomaticallyGenerated, Ability-Based Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), 1257-1266. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
12. Goren-Bar, D.; Graziola, I.; Pianesi, F.; and Zancanaro, M. 2005. The Influence of Personality Factors on Visitor Attitudes Towards Adaptivity Dimensions for Mobile Museum Guides. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 16(1): 31-62.
13. Greenberg, S., and Witten, I. 1985. Adaptive Personalized Interfaces: A Question of Viability. Behaviour and Information Technology 4(1): 31-45.
14. Höök, K. 2000. Steps to Take before Intelligent User Interfaces Become Real. Journal of Interacting with Computers 12(4): 409-426. (Pubitemid 30562059)
15. Jameson, A. Understanding and Dealing with Usability Side Effects of Intelligent Processing. AI Magazine 30(4).
16. Lieberman, H. User Interface Goals, AI Opportunities. AI Magazine 30(4).
17. McGrenere, J., and Moore, G. 2000. Are We All in the Same "Bloat"? In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, 187-196. Toronto: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.
18. McGrenere, J.; Baecker, R.; and Booth, K. 2002. An Evaluation of a Multiple Interface Design Solution for Bloated Software. CHI Letters 4(1): 163-170.
19. Mitchell, J., and Shneiderman, B. 1989. Dynamic Versus Static Menus: An Exploratory Comparison. SIGCHI Bulletin 20(4): 33-37.
20. Sears, A., and Shneiderman, B. 1994. Split Menus: Effectively Using Selection Frequency to Organize Menus. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1(1): 27-51.
21. Shneiderman, B., and Maes, P. 1997. Direct Manipulation Versus Interface Agents: Excerpts from Debates at IUI 97 and CHI 97. Interactions 4(6): 42-61. (Pubitemid 127153273)
22. Spaulding, A. Usability Engineering for Interactive Intelligent Systems. AI Magazine 30(4).
23. Trevellyan, R., and Browne, D. P. 1987. A Self-Regulating Adaptive System. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (CHI'87), 103-107. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
24. Tsandilas, T., and Schraefel, M. C. 2005. An Empirical Assessment of Adaptation Techniques. In CHTOS Extended Abstracts, 20092012. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.