The Dam1 ring binds to the E-hook of tubulin and diffuses along the microtubule

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 457-466

  Ramey, Vincent H ^a,b   Wang, Hong Wei ^b,d   Nakajima, Yuko ^a   Wong, Amanda ^a   Liu, Jian ^c   Drubin, David ^a   Barnes, Georjana ^a   Nogales, Eva ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUBULIN;

ARTICLE; BUDDING; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; DEPOLYMERIZATION; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST;

CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DIFFUSION; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCETALES; TUBULIN;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 79951826786     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0841     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alushin GM, Ramey VH, Pasqualato S, Ball DA, Grigorieff N, Musacchio A, Nogales E (2010). The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 467, 805-810.
2. Asbury CL, Gestaut DR, Powers AF, Franck AD, Davis TN (2006). The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 9873-9878. (Pubitemid 43993590)
3. Cheeseman IM, Anderson S, Jwa M, Green EM, Kang J, Yates JR, 3rd, Chan CS, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2002). Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163-172. (Pubitemid 35292437)
4. Cheeseman IM, Brew C, Wolyniak M, Desai A, Anderson S, Muster N, Yates JR, Huffaker TC, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2001). Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function. J Cell Biol 155, 1137-1145. (Pubitemid 34286265)
5. Ciferri C et al. (2008). Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427-439. (Pubitemid 351622013)
6. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ (2008). The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36, W197-W201.
7. Efremov A, Grishchuk EL, McIntosh JR, Ataullakhanov FI (2007). In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 19017-19022.
8. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Davis TN, Asbury CL (2007). Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 9, 832-837. (Pubitemid 47019470)
9. Frank J, Radermacher M, Penczek P, Zhu J, Li Y, Ladjadj M, Leith A (1996). SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J Struct Biol 116, 190-199. (Pubitemid 26093143)
10. Gestaut DR, Graczyk B, Cooper J, Widlund PO, Zelter A, Wordeman L, Asbury CL, Davis TN (2008). Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat Cell Biol 10, 407-414.
11. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O'Shea EK, Weissman JS (2003). Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741. (Pubitemid 37314318)
12. Grishchuk EL, Efremov AK, Volkov VA, Spiridonov IS, Gudimchuk N, Westermann S, Drubin D, Barnes G, McIntosh JR, Ataullakhanov FI (2008a). The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 15423-15428.
13. Grishchuk EL, Spiridonov IS, Volkov VA, Efremov A, Westermann S, Drubin D, Barnes G, Ataullakhanov FI, McIntosh JR (2008b). Different assemblies of the DAM1 complex follow shortening microtubules by distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 6918-6923. (Pubitemid 351754505)
14. Joglekar AP, Bouck DC, Molk JN, Bloom KS, Salmon ED (2006). Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site. Nat Cell Biol 8, 581-585. (Pubitemid 43827350)
15. Kiermaier E, Woehrer S, Peng Y, Mechtler K, Westermann S (2009). A Dam1-based artificial kinetochore is sufficient to promote chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 11, 1109-1115.
16. Kikkawa M, Ishikawa T, Wakabayashi T, Hirokawa N (1995). Three-dimensional structure of the kinesin head-microtubule complex. Nature 376, 274-277.
17. Koshland DE, Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW (1988). Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature 331, 499-504. (Pubitemid 18064374)
18. Lacefield S, Lau DT, Murray AW (2009). Recruiting a microtubule-binding complex to DNA directs chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 11, 1116-1120.
19. Lampert F, Hornung P, Westermann S (2010). The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Cell Biol 189, 641-649.
20. Liu J, Onuchic JN (2006). A driving and coupling "Pac-Man" mechanism for chromosome poleward translocation in anaphase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 18432-18437.
21. Miranda JJ, De Wulf P, Sorger PK, Harrison SC (2005). The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12, 138-143.
22. Miranda JJ, King DS, Harrison SC (2007). Protein arms in the kinetochore-microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex. Mol Biol Cell 18, 2503-2510. (Pubitemid 47025716)
23. Mizuno N, Toba S, Edamatsu M, Watai-Nishii J, Hirokawa N, Toyoshima YY, Kikkawa M (2004). Dynein and kinesin share an overlapping microtubule- binding site. EMBO J 23, 2459-2467. (Pubitemid 38988219)
24. Ramey VH, Wang HW, Nogales E (2009). Ab initio reconstruction of helical samples with heterogeneity, disorder and coexisting symmetries. J Struct Biol 167, 97-105.
25. Redeker V, Melki R, Prome D, Le Caer JP, Rossier J (1992). Structure of tubulin C-terminal domain obtained by subtilisin treatment. The major alpha and beta tubulin isotypes from pig brain are glutamylated. FEBS Lett 313, 185-192.
26. Sindelar CV, Downing KH (2010). An atomic-level mechanism for activation of the kinesin molecular motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 4111-4116.
27. Tien JF, Umbreit NT, Gestaut DR, Franck AD, Cooper J, Wordeman L, Gonen T, Asbury CL, Davis TN (2010). Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J Cell Biol 189, 713-723.
28. Wang HW, Ramey VH, Westermann S, Leschziner AE, Welburn JP, Nakajima Y, Drubin DG, Barnes G, Nogales E (2007). Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14, 721-726. (Pubitemid 47220060)
29. Westermann S, Avila-Sakar A, Wang HW, Niederstrasser H, Wong J, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G (2005). Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol Cell 17, 277-290. (Pubitemid 40138621)
30. Westermann S, Wang HW, Avila-Sakar A, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G (2006). The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440, 565-569.
31. Wong J et al. (2007). A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle. Mol Biol Cell 18, 3800-3809. (Pubitemid 47519474)