Multidimensional assessment of technology and innovation programs: The impact evaluation of INCAGRO-Peru

Research Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 361-372

  Salles Filho, Sergio L M ^a   Avila, A Flavio ^b   Alonso, Juan Ernesto O S ^a   Colugnati, Fernando A B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c Instituto de Pesquisa em Tecnologia e Inovação IPTI   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951796567     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820210X12904313498360     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adrian, A M, S H Norwood and P L Mask 2005. Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48, 256-271.
2. Alston, M J, C Chan-Kang, M C Marra, P G Pardey and T J Wyatt 2001. A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D: Ex Pede Herculem Evaluation and Priority Setting. Washington: IFPRI. 148pp. (Research Report, 113).
3. Avila, A F D, M Magalhães, G Vedovotto, L J M Irias and G S Rodrigues 2005. Avaliação dos impactos das tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa. Revista de Política Agrícola, Brasília, 15(4), October/November/December, 86-101.
4. Bin, A and S L M Salles-Filho 2008. Science, technology and innovation management: specificities and conceptual premises. Presented at the 12th International Schumpeter Society Conference. Rio de Janeiro, 2-4 July.
5. Blazy, J-M, M Dorel, F Salomon, H Ozier-Lafontane, J Wery and P Tixier 2009. Model-based assesment of technological innovation in banana cropping systems contextualized by farm types in Guadeloupe. European Journal of Agronomy, 10-19.
6. Challenges and opportunities (No. 87, pp. 47-56). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Davidson, P 1996. Reality and economic theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(4), Summer.
8. Freeman, C 1998. Introduction. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, eds G Dosi, C Freeman, R Nelson and G Silverberg. London: Pinter.
9. Furtado, A T, A Bin, M B Bonacelli, S R Paulino, M A Miglino and P F D Castro 2006. Evaluation of the Results and Impacts of a Social-Oriented Technological Program in Brazil: the Case of the Prosab (Sanitation Program). Annual Conference Technology Transfer Society Next Generation Innovation: New Approaches and Policy Designs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA, 27-29 September.
10. Goméz Sal, A and A González García 2007. A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use system in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120, 82-91.
11. Hall, A, V R Sulaiman, N Clark and B Yogana 2003. From measuring impact to learning institutional lesson: an innovation system perspective on improving the management of international agriculture research. Agricultural Systems, 78, 213-241.
12. Jassen, S and M K van Ittersum 2007. Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: a review of bioeconomic farm models. Agricultural Systems, 94, 622-636.
13. Kislev, Y and M Hoffman 1978. Research and productivity in wheat in Israel. Development Studies, 4, 166-181.
14. Kline, S and N Rosenberg 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy, eds R Landau and N Rosenberg. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
15. Nelson, R R 1998 Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, eds G Dosi, C Freeman, R Nelson and G Silverberg. London: Pinter.
16. Ny, H, J P Macdonald, G Broman, R Yamamoto and K-H Robert 2006. Sustainability constraints as system boundaries: an approach to making live-cycle managment strategic. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1-2), 61-77.
17. Payraudeau, S and H M van der Werf 2005. Environmental impact assessment for farming region: a review of methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Enviroment, 1-19.
18. Roessner, D 2000. Quantitative and qualitative methods and measures in the evaluation of research. Research Evaluation, 9(2), August, 125-132.
19. Rogers, J and B Bozeman 2001. Knowledge value alliances: an alternative to R&D project evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(1), 23-55.
20. Rogers, P 2000. Causal models in program theory evaluation. In Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities, New Directions in Program Evaluation, eds P Rogers, T Hacsi, A Petrosino and T Huebner, 87, 47-55. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Rosenberg, N 1982. Inside Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press. Rosenberg, 1992?
22. Salles-Filho, S L M, M B M Bonacelli, M Zackiewicz, P F D Castro and A Bin 2007. Desenvolvimento e Aplicação de Metodologia de Avaliação de Programas de Fomento a C,T&I: o Método de Decomposição. In: XII Seminario Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica. Buenos Aires: ALTEC.
23. Tosterud, R J, J C Gilson, A E Hannah and B R Stefansson 1973. Benefit cost evaluation of research relating to the development of Selkirk wheat and target rapeseed. In Symposium on Agricultural Research, Proceedings, 1, s.l. University of Manitoba, 1, 149-199 (occasional service).
24. Weitzman, B C, D Silver and K Dillman 2002. Integrating a comparison group design into a theory of change evaluation: the case of the urban health initiative. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 371-385.