Antibacterial activity and physical properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 46-55

  Tüzüner, Tamer ^a   Kuşgöz, Adem ^a   Er, Kürşat ^a   Taşdemir, Tamer ^a   Buruk, Kurtuluş ^a   Kemer, Bariş ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CETRIMIDE; CHLORHEXIDINE; FLUORIDE; FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC MOLAR; KETAC-MOLAR; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; BACTERIAL LOAD; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFUSION; DRUG EFFECT; HARDNESS; HUMAN; IMMUNODIFFUSION; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; BACTERIAL LOAD; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CETRIMONIUM COMPOUNDS; CHLORHEXIDINE; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; IMMUNODIFFUSION; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; MATERIALS TESTING; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79951783205     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00385.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:372-81. (Pubitemid 128543220)
2. Massara ML, Alves JB, Brandao PR. Atraumatic restorative treatment: clinical, ultrastructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res 2002;36:430-6.
3. Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, Van Amerongen WE, et al. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2004;83:120-3. (Pubitemid 41713794)
4. Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth: review of literature. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:294-8.
5. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:436-41.
6. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, et al. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 1999;33:130-4.
7. Van Amerongen WE. Dental caries under glass ionomer restorations. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:150-4. (Pubitemid 126673769)
8. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Kerpes S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10:373-81. (Pubitemid 14240342)
9. Riberio J, Ericson D. In vitro antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine added to glass-ionomer cements. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:533-40.
10. Sanders BJ, Gregory RL, Moore K, et al. Antibacterial and physical properties of resin modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:553-8. (Pubitemid 41705123)
11. Botelho MG. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 2003;37:108-14. (Pubitemid 37026218)
12. Palmer G, Jones FH, Billington RW, et al. Chlorhexidine release from experimental glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:423-31.
13. Pinheiro SL, Simionato MRL, Imparato JCP, et al. Antibacterial activity of glassionomer containing antibiotics on caries lesion microorganisms. Am J Dent 2005;18:261-6. (Pubitemid 41483350)
14. Botelho MG. The antimicrobial activity of a dentin conditioner combined with antibacterial agents. Oper Dent 2005;30:75-82. (Pubitemid 40348290)
15. Takahashi Y, Imazoto S, Kaneshiro AV, et al. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomers cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006;22:647-52. (Pubitemid 43849941)
16. Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ertugrul F, et al. Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidine. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:29-44.
17. Hoszek A, Ericson D. In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass-ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Oper Dent 2008;33:696-701.
18. Yesilyurt C, Er K, Tasdemir T, et al. Antibacterial activity and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing antibiotics. Oper Dent 2009;34:18-23.
19. Botelho MG. The microtensile bond strength of Fuji IX glass ionomer cement to antibacterial conditioned dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:311-7. (Pubitemid 40745390)
20. Botelho MG. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements with dentin antibacterial agents. SADJ 2004;59:51-3.
21. McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, et al. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 2002;27:430-7. (Pubitemid 41558771)
22. Sá LT, González-Cabezas C, Cochran MA, et al. Fluoride releasing materials: their anti-cariogenic properties tested in in-vitro caries models. Oper Dent 2004;29:524-31. (Pubitemid 39278670)
23. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:93-7.
24. Kemer B, Ozdes D, Gundogdu A, et al. Removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution by waste mud. J Hazard Mater 2009;15:888-94.
25. Weerheijm KL, de Soet JJ, van Amerongen WE, et al. The effect of glass ionomer cement on carious dentine. An in vivo study. Caries Res 1993;27:417-23.
26. Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Delmee M, et al. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:368-74. (Pubitemid 40655808)
27. Tobias RS. Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int Endod 1988;21:155-60.
28. Coogan MM, Creaven PJ. Antibacterial properties of eight dental cements. Int Endod 1993;26:355-61.
29. Pons JL, Bonnaveiro N, Chevalier J, et al. Evaluations of antimicrobial interactions between chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium compounds, preservatives and excepients. J Appl Bacteriol 1992;73:395-400.
30. Botelho MG. Fractional inhibitory concentration index of combinations of antibacterial agents against cariogenic organisms. J Dent 2000;28:565-70.
31. Önçaǧ Ö, Hoşgör M, Hilmioǧlu S, et al. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod 2003;36:423-32. (Pubitemid 37255724)
32. Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glassionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials 1998;19:485-94.
33. Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, et al. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater 2001;17:34-9. (Pubitemid 33651174)
34. Silva RC, Zuanon ACC, Esberard RR, et al. In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:139-42.
35. Yap AUJ, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil 2003;8:1-8. (Pubitemid 37248996)
36. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, et al. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-8. (Pubitemid 126355656)
37. McKinney JE, Wu W. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1985;64:1326-31. (Pubitemid 16227212)
38. Markovic DL, Petrovic BB, Peric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 2008;8:1-8.
39. Koga H, Kameyama A, Matsukubo T, et al. Comparison of short-term in-vitro fluoride release and recharge from four different types of pit-and-fissure sealants. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2004;45:173-9.