|
Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 173-179
|
Comparison of short-term in vitro fluoride release and recharge from four different types of pit-and-fissure sealants.
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACIDULATED FLUOROPHOSPHATE;
ANTICARIES AGENT;
FISSURE SEALANT;
FLUORIDE;
GLASS IONOMER;
HELIOSEAL;
RESIN;
TEETHMATE FTM;
TEETHMATE-FTM;
WATER;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
CATTLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DIFFUSION;
ENAMEL;
MATERIALS TESTING;
METABOLISM;
TEMPERATURE;
TIME;
ACIDULATED PHOSPHATE FLUORIDE;
ANIMALS;
CARIOSTATIC AGENTS;
CATTLE;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
DIFFUSION;
FLUORIDES;
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS;
MATERIALS TESTING;
PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS;
TEMPERATURE;
TIME FACTORS;
WATER;
|
EID: 15944368927
PISSN: 00408891
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.45.173 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (0)
|