Sequential effects after practice with the dominant and non-dominant hand on the acquisition of a sliding task in schoolchildren

Laterality

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 227-239

  Senff, Oliver ^a   Weigelt, Matthias ^b  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hemispheric specialization; Interlimb transfer; Motor learning; Skill acquisition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STANDARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CHILD; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 79951756807     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: 14640678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500903549414     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bagesteiro, L. B., & Sainburg, R. L. (2002). Handedness: Dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2408-2421.
2. Birbaumer, N. (2007). Motor learning: Passing a skill from one hand to the other. Current Biology, 17, R1024-R1026.
3. Byrd, R., Gibson, M., & Gleason, M. H. (1986). Bilateral transfer across ages 7 to 17 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62(1), 87-90.
4. Carson, R. G. (1989). Manual asymmetries: In defense of a multifactorial account. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 157-162.
5. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York: Norton.
6. Goedert, K. M., & Willingham, D. B. (2002). Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learning & Memory, 9, 279-292.
7. Goodale, M. A. (1990). Brain asymmetries in the control of reaching. In M. A. Goodale (Ed.), Vision and action: The control of grasping (pp. 14-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Haaland, E., & Hoff, J. (2003). Non-dominant leg training improves the bilateral motor performance of soccer players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 13, 179-184.
9. Krakauer, J. W., Ghilardi, M-F., & Ghez, C. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1026-1031.
10. Laszlo, J. I., Baguley, R. A., & Bairstow, P. J. (1970). Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2, 261-271.
11. Magill, R. A. (2001). Motor learning: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
12. Panzer, S., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2006). Learning of similar complex movement sequences: Proactive and retroactive effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 60-70.
13. Parker-Taillon, D., & Kerr, R. (1989). Manual asymmetries within the performance of a complex motor task. Human Movement Science, 8, 33-44.
14. Parlow, S. E., & Kinsbourne, M. (1989). Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain & Cognition, 11(1), 98-113.
15. Puretz, S. L. (1983). Bilateral transfer: The effects of practice on the transfer of complex dance movement patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 48-54.
16. Raibert, M. (1977). Motor control and learning by the state-space model. Technical report, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (AI-TR-439). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
17. Sainburg, R. L. (2002). Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 241-258.
18. Sainburg, R. L., & Kalakanis, D. (2000). Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2661-2675.
19. Sainburg, R. L., & Eckhardt (2005). Optimization through lateralization: The evolution of handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 611-612.
20. Sainburg, R. L., & Wang, J. (2002). Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 437-447.
21. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
22. Serrien, D. A., Ivry, R. B., & Swinnen, S. P. (2006). Dynamics of interhemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7, 160-167.
23. Stöckel, T., Hartmann, C., & Weigelt, M. (2007). Reihenfolgeeffekte fü r das Erlernen komplexer sportmotorischer Fertigkeiten auf beiden Körperseiten: Eine Basketballuntersuchung bei Schulkindern [Bilateral practice effects on the acquisition of complex sport skills: A basketball study with school children]. Zeitschrift fü r Sportpsychologie, 14, 130-135.
24. Stöckel, T., Weigelt, M., & Krug, J. (2010). Acquisition of a complex basketball dribbling task in school children as a function of bilateral practice order. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.
25. Taylor, G. H., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Left hemisphere motor dominance in right handers. Cortex, 16, 587-603.
26. Teixeira, L. A. (2000). Timing and force components in bilateral transfer of learning. Brain and Cognition, 44, 455-469.
27. Teixeira, L. A., Silva, M. V., & Carvalho, M. A. (2003). Reduction of lateral asymmetries in dribbling: The role of bilateral practice. Laterality, 8(1), 53-65.
28. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2003). Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 349-360.
29. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2004a). Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 1-8.
30. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2004b). Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 349-360.
31. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2007). The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Experimental Brain Research, 178, 565-570.
32. West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). The domain specificity and generality of overconfidence: Individual differences in performance estimation bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(3), 387-392.
33. Zach, N., Kanarek, N., Inbar, D., Grinvald, Y., Milestein, T., & Vaadia, E. (2005). Segregation between acquisition and long-term memory in sensorimotor learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2357-2362.