Non-dominant leg training improves the bilateral motor performance of soccer players

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 179-184

  Haaland, E ^a   Hoff, J ^b,c  

^a Stadion Medical Practice   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Dominant; Learning; Motor skill; Non dominant; Training

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEG; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRAINING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LEG; MALE; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCCER; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141889527     PISSN: 09057188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00296.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ammons RB. Le mouvement. In: Steward GH, Steward JP, eds. Current Psychological Issues. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1958: 146-183.
2. Annett M. Left, right, hand and brain. In: The Right Shift Theory. London: Erlbaum, 1985.
3. Bootsma RJ, Mestre DR, Bakker FC. Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. J Exp Psychol: Human Perception Performance 1994: 3: 591-612.
4. Cook TW. Studies in cross education II. Further experimentation in mirror tracing the star shaped maze. J Exp Psych 1933: 16: 670-700.
5. Cook TW. Studies in cross education V. Theoret Psych Rev 1936: 43: 149-178.
6. Crossman ERFW. A theory of the acquisition of speed-skill. Ergonomics 1959: 2: 153-166.
7. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993: 100: 363-406.
8. Gibson JJ. In: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
9. Jacobs DM, Michaels CF, Runeson S. Perceptual learning and its importance for the visual perception of relative mass. In: Bril B, ed. Advances in Perception-Action Coupling. Paris: EDK, 1998.
10. Kelso JAS. Dynamic patterns. The Self-Organisation of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.
11. Klemmer ET. Communication and human performance. Human Factors 1962: 4: 75-79.
12. Kohl RM, Roenker DM. Bilateral transfer as a function of mental imagery. J Motor Behavior 1980: 12: 197-206.
13. Lee DN. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 1976: 5: 437-459.
14. Lee DN, Davis MO, Green PR, van der Weel R. Visual control of approach by pigeons when landing. J Exp Biol 1993: 180: 85-104.
15. Lee DN, Reddish PE, Rand DT. Aerial Docking by Hummingbirds. Naturwissenshaften 1991: 78: 526-527.
16. Lee DN, Young DS, Reddish PE, Lough S, Clayton TMH. Visualtiming in hitting an accelerating ball. Quart J Exp Psych 1983: 35A: 333-346.
17. Magill RA. In: Motor learning. Concepts and Applications. Indiana: Brown and Benchmark, 1993.
18. Peters M. Prolonged practice of a simple motor task by preferred and non-preferred hands. Perc Motor Skills 1976: 43: 447-450.
19. Peters M. Handedness: effect of prolonged practice between hand performance differences. Neuropsychology 1981: 19: 587-590.
20. Provins KA, Glencross DJ. Handwriting, typewriting and handedness. Quart J Exp Psych 1968: 20: 282-289.
21. Provins KA. The specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry: a review of the evidence and its implications. J Motor Behavior 1997: 29: 183-192.
22. Raibert M. Motor control and learning by the state-space model. Technical report. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (AI-TR-439), 1977.
23. Sale DG. Testing strength and power. In: MacDougall D, Wenger HA, Green HJ, eds. Physiological Testing of the High-Performance Athlete. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics, 1991: 74-75.
24. Schmidt RA. The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In: Stelmach GE, eds. Motor Control: Issues and Trends. New York: Academic Press, 1976: 41-65.