The development and use of algorithms for diagnosing and choosing treatment of ostomy complications: Results of a prospective evaluation

Ostomy Wound Management

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 20-27

  Kalashnikova, Irina ^a,b   Achkasov, Sergey ^a   Fadeeva, Svetlana ^a   Vorobiev, Genadiy ^c,d  

^a Ostomy Rehabilitation Centre   (Russian Federation)

^b Outpatients' Clinic   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

^d State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

choice of treatment; decision tree; diagnosis; ostomy complications

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DECISION TREE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; STOMA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DECISION TREES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RUSSIA;

EID: 79951715655     PISSN: 08895899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E, et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction (Pubitemid 40458705)
2. Kairaluoma M, Rissanen H, Kultti V, Mecklin JP, Kellokumpu I. Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996. Dig Surg. 2002;19(1):45-51. (Pubitemid 34310057)
3. Lawson A. Complications of stoma. In: Elcoat C (ed). Stoma Care Nursing. London, UK: Hollister;2003:143-146.
4. Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, et al. A prospective audit of stomas - analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(1):49-52. (Pubitemid 36367466)
5. Barr JE. Assessment and management of stomal complications: a framework for clinical decision making. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(9):50-56.
6. Bosio G, Pisani F, Lucibello L, et al. A proposal for classifying peristomal skin disorders: results of a multicenter observational study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007;53(9):38-43.
7. Breckman B. Stoma Care and Rehabilitation. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005:280-290.
8. Butler DL. Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery: a review. J WOCN. 2009;36(5):513-519.
9. Caricato M, Ausania F, Ripetti V, Bartolozzi F, Campoli G, Coppola R. Retrospective analysis of long-term defunctioning stoma complications after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(6):559-561. (Pubitemid 46958550)
10. Colwell JC, Goldberg M, Carmel J. The state of the standard diversion. J WOCN. 2001;28(1):6-17. (Pubitemid 33602123)
11. Cottam J. Audit of stoma complications within three weeks of surgery. Gastrointestinal Nurs. 2005;3(1):19-23.
12. Harris DA, Egbeare D, Jones S, Benjamin H, Woodward A, Foster ME. Complications and mortality following stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(6):427-431. (Pubitemid 41645524)
13. Lyon C, Smith AJ. Abdominal Stomas and Their Skin Disorders. London, UK: Martin Dunits Ltd; 2001:9-19,123.
14. Pittman J, Rawl SM, Schmidt CM, et al. Demographic and clinical factors related to ostomy complications and quality of life in veterans with an ostomy. J WOCN. 2008;35(5):493-503.
15. Ratliff C, Donovan A. Frequency of peristomal complications. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001;47(8):26-29.
16. Rolstad BS, Erwin-Toth PL. Peristomal skin complications: prevention and management. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(9):68-77.
17. Salvadalena G. Incidence of complications of the stoma and peristomal skin among individuals with colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy: a systematic review. J WOCN. 2008;35(6):596-607.
18. Stoiko Y, Maanikhas G, Khanevich M, Konovalov S. Prevention and Treatment of Parastomal Complications. St. Petersburg, Russia: Agraf+; 2008:16-40.
19. Mikhajlova EV, Petrov VP, Perekhodov SN.Intestinal Stomas:Formation Rules, Complications and Intestinal Stoma Diseases.Moscow, Russia:Nauka;2006:41.
20. Mikhajlova EV, Petrov VP, Perekhodov SN. Intestinal Stomas: Formation Rules, Complications and Intestinal Stoma Diseases. Moscow, Russia: Nauka;2006:41. 20. Vorobey A, Schepkovski M. Local complications of permanent entero- and colostomies, their prevention and treatment. Surg News. 1996;1:1-17.
21. Vorobyyev G, Tsarkov P. Principles of Intestinal Stoma Surgery. Moscow, Russia: Stolnyj Grad;2002:76-97.
22. Bagi P, Jendresen M, Kirkegaard P. Early local stoma complications in relation to the applied suture material: comparison between monofilament and multifilament sutures. Dis Colon Rect. 1992;35(8):739-742.
23. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(9):834-838. (Pubitemid 47578032)
24. Tappe A, McKenzie F, Sheldon J, Smith A, Colton B, Woolley D. Global stoma care challenges: a united approach. World Council Enterostomal Therap J. 2005;25(4):15-21.
25. Woo KY, Sibbald RG, Ayello EA, Coutts PM, Garde DE. Peristomal skin complications and management. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22(11):522-532.
26. Burt-McAliley D, Eberhardt D, van Rijswijk L. Clinical study: peristomal skin irritation in colostomy patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1994;40(6):28-36.
27. Colwell JC, Beitz J. Survey of wound, ostomy and continence (WOC) nurse clinicians on stomal and peristomal complications: a content validation study. J WOCN. 2007;34(1):57-69.
28. Herlufsen P, Olsen AG, Carlsen B, et al. Study of peristomal skin disorders in patients with permanent stomas. Br J Nurs. 2006;15(16):854-862.
29. Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, et al. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(3):279-285. (Pubitemid 40637430)
30. St-Cyr D. An evaluation of the Canadian Ostomy Assessment Guide. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48(8):26-32.
31. Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. Stoma Complications: Best Practice for Clinicians. Mount Laurel, NJ: Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society;2005.
32. Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. Peristomal Skin Complications: Best Practice for Clinicians. Mount Laurel, NJ: Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society; 2007.
33. Burch J, Sica J. Common peristomal skin problems and potential treatment options. Br J Nurs. 2008;17(17):S4,S6,S8.
34. Beitz J, van Rijswijk L. Using wound care algorithms: a content validation study. J WOCN. 1999;26(5):238-249.
35. Kats A. Medical Algorithm for Diagnosis. Intuitive and Methodological Aspects. Moscow, Russia: VEIN; 2002:341.
36. Naumov L. Diagnostic Algorithms and Training Programs. Novosibirsk, Russia: 1972:91.
37. Beitz J, van Rijswijk L. A cross-sectional study to validate wound care algorithms for use by registered nurses. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010;56(4):46-59.
38. Beitz J. The ostomy files: A validated care algorithm: applications to clinical practice. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010;56(5):16.