Using wound care algorithms: A content validation study

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 238-249

  Beitz, Janice M ^a   Van Rijswijk, Lia ^a  

^a LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION TREE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN CARE; STANDARD;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION TREES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKIN CARE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 0033187426     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1071-5754(99)90053-0     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. 1995 wound care products resource. Advances in Wound Care (part 2 of 2). Springhouse (PA): Springhouse Corporation; 1995.
2. Krasner D. Dressing decisions for the twenty-first century: on the cusp of a paradigm shift. In: Krasner D, Kane D, editors. Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for healthcare professionals, 2nd ed. Wayne (PA): Health Management Publications; 1997. p. 139-51.
3. Bolton LL, van Rijswijk L. Occlusive dressings. In: Parish LC, Witkowski JA, Crissey JT, editors. The decubitus ulcers in clinical practice. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1997.
4. van Rijswijk L, Beitz J. The traditions and terminology of wound care: food for thought. JWOCN 1998;25:116-22.
5. Bux M, Malhi JS. Assessing the use of dressings in practice. J Wound Care 1996;5:305-8.
6. Ballard-Krishnan S, van Rijswijk L, Polansky M. Pressure ulcers in extended care facilities: report of a survey. J WOCN 1994;21:4-11.
7. van Rijswijk L. Wound assessment and documentation. In: Krasner D, Kane D, editors. Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for healthcare professionals, 2nd ed. Wayne (PA): Health Management Publications; 1997. p. 16-28.
8. Beitz J, Fey J, O'Brien D. Perceived need for education versus actual knowledge of pressure ulcer care. Medsurg Nuts 1998;7:293-301.
9. Pieper B, Mattern JC. Critical care nurses' knowledge of pressure prevention, staging, and description. Ostomy Wound Manage 1997;43:22-31.
10. Knight CL. The chronic wound management decision tree: a tool for long-term care nurses. J WOCN 1996;23:92-9.
11. Melchior-MacDougall F, Lander J. Evaluation of a decision tree for management of chronic wounds. J WOCN 1995;22:81-8.
12. Gaines C. Concept mapping and synthesizers: instructional strategies for encoding and recalling. J NY State Nurses Assoc 1996;27:14-8.
13. Hadorn DC, McCormick K, Diokno A. An annotated algorithm approach to clinical guideline development. JAMA 1992;267:3311-4.
14. van Rijswijk L. Wound care practices in the home: signposts to effective patient outcomes. Wound care policies and procedures manual. Skillman (NJ): ConvaTec; 1995.
15. Beitz J. Concept maps: navigating the learning process. Nurse Educ 1998;23:35-41.
16. McGuckin M, Stineman M, Goin J, Williams S. The road to developing standards for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 1996;42(10A):62S-66S.
17. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1985.
18. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993.
19. Davis GC. Measurement and clinical decision making: focus on instrument development. Nurs Diagn 1994;5:121-6.
20. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:269-74.
21. Waltz CW, Bausell RB. Nursing research: design statistics, and computer analysis. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1981.
22. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:382-5.
23. Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht ML. Validity and reliability of the pressure sore status tool. Decubitus 1992;5:20-8.
24. Bergstrom N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE, et al. Treatment of pressure ulcers. Clinical practice guideline, No. 15 (AHCPR publication No. 95-0652). Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care policy and Research; 1994.
25. Gulanick M, Klopp A, Galanes S, Gradishar D, Knoll Puzas M. Nursing care plans: nursing diagnosis and intervention, 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1994.
26. Bolton LL, van Rijswijk L. Wound dressings: meeting clinical and biological needs. Dermatol Nurs 1991;3:146-61.
27. Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults. Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. Clinical practice guideline, No, 3 (AHCPR publication No. 92-0047). Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.
28. Wagner FW. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle 1981;2:64-122.
29. Herndon DN, Curreri WP, Abston S, Rutan TC, Barrow RE. Treatment of burns. Chicago: Year Book; 1987.
30. Burton CS. Treatment of leg ulcers. Dermatol Clin 1993;11:315-23.
31. Krasner D, Kennedy KL, Rolstad BS, Roma AW. The ABC's of wound care dressings. Ostomy Wound Manage 1993;39:66-86.
32. Maklebust J, Sieggreen M. Pressure ulcers: guidelines for prevention and nursing management, 2nd ed. West Dundee (IL): S-N Publications; 1996.
33. Benner P. From novice to expert; excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park (CA): Addison-Wesley; 1984.
34. Polge J. Critical thinking: the use of intuition in making clinical nursing judgments. J NY State Nurses Assoc 1995;26(2):4-9.
35. Verhonick R. Decubitus ulcer observations measured objectively. Nurs Res 1961;10:211-4.
36. Stotts NA. Impaired wound healing. In: Carrieri VK, Lindsay AM, West CM, editors. Pathophysiological phenomenon in nursing: human responses to illness. Philadelphia: WB Sounders; 1986.
37. Cooper DM. Development and testing of an instrument to assess the visual characteristics of open, soft tissue wounds (dissertation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 1990.
38. Hunt TK, Dunphy JE. Fundamentals of wound management. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970.
39. Hunt TK, Jawetz E, Hutchinson JGP, Dunphy E. A new model for the study of wound infection. J Trauma 1967;7:298-305.