Retrospective analysis of long-term defunctioning stoma complications after colorectal surgery

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 559-561

  Caricato, M ^a   Ausania, F ^a,b   Ripetti, V ^a   Bartolozzi, F ^a   Campoli, G ^a   Coppola, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^b Department of General Surgery ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Colostomy; Ileostomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COLOSTOMY; DERMATITIS; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HERNIA; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STENOSIS; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLOSTOMY; DIVERTICULOSIS, COLONIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34250782033     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01187.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Marusch F, Koch A. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1164-71.
2. Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1114-7.
3. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH. De-functioning stomas: A prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 566-70.
4. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001; 25: 274-7; discussion 277-8.
5. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: Randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 76-9.
6. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 916-20.
7. Bass EM, Del Pino A, Tan A, Pearl RK, Orsay CP, Abcarian H. Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 440-2.
8. Leenen LP, Kuypers JH. Some factors influencing the outcome of stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 500-4.
9. Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: A call for benchmarking. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1334-8; discussion -9.
10. Mileski WJ, Rege RV, Joehl RJ, Nahrwold DL. Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 17-21.
11. Segreti EM, Levenback C, Morris M, Lucas KR, Gershenson DM, Burke TW. A comparison of end and loop colostomy for fecal diversion in gynecologic patients with colonic fistulas. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 60: 49-53.
12. Mosdell DM, Doberneck RC. Morbidity and mortality of ostomy closure. Am J Surg 1991; 162: 633-6; discussion 636-7.