Eager 'weavers': Designing assessment for an online environment

Nurse Education in Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 99-103

  Wyllie, Aileen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Online assessment; Peer review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMANITIES; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL PROFESSION; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; NURSING EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

AUSTRALIA; EDUCATION, NURSING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMANITIES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNET; MIDWIFERY; NEW SOUTH WALES; PEER REVIEW; SOCIAL SCIENCES; TEACHING; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 79951682594     PISSN: 14715953     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bennett S., Barp D. Peer observation - a case for doing it online. Teaching in Higher Education 2008, 13(5):559-570.
2. Bennett S., Santy J. A window on our teaching practice: enhancing individual online teaching quality though online peer observation and support. A UK case study. Nurse Education in Practice 2009, 9:403-406.
3. Bernstein D.J., Burnett A.N., Goodburn A., Savory P. Making teaching and learning visible: course portfolios and the peer review of teaching 2006, Anker, Bolton, MA.
4. Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does 2007, Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK. third ed.
5. Boud D. Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for a learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 2000, 22(2):151-167.
6. Dirndorfer-Anderson T., Parker N., McKenzie J. Assessing online collaboratories: a peer review of teaching & learning 2009, ATN Assessment Conference 2009 Proceedings.
7. Gallagher-Lepak S., Reilly J., Killon C.M. Nursing student perceptions of community in online learning. Contemporary Nurse 2009, 32(1-2):133-146.
8. Glassick C.E., Huber M.T., Maeroff G.I. Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professoriate (a special report) 1997, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, San Francisco, US.
9. Marshall B. Learning from the academy: from peer observation of teaching to peer enhancement of learning and teaching. Journal of Adult Theological Education 1994, 1(2):185-204.
10. McConnell D. The experience of collaborative assessment in e-Learning. Studies in Continuing Education 2002, 24(1):73-92.
11. Menzies G., Pratt J., Thorp S., Docherty P. Piloting a peer feedback program at UTS. Professional development project 2008, International Teachers Program Boccioni, University.
12. McKenzie J., Pelliccione L., Parker N. Developing Peer Review of Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Frameworks and Challenges. Paper Presented at the in Hello! where Are You in the Landscape of Educational Technology? 2008, Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2009. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/mckenzie-j.pdf.
13. McMahon T., Barrett T., O'Neill G. Using observation of teaching to improve quality: finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. Teaching in Higher Education 2007, 12(4):499-511.
14. Pallof R., Pratt K. Collaborating online: learning together in community 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
15. Pelliccione L., Dixon K., Siragusa L., Howitt C., Atweh B., Dender A., Swaine J. Academic peer review: enhancing learning environments for global graduates. Teaching & learning for global graduates. Proceedings of the 18th annual teaching learning forum 2009, 29-30. Curtin University of Technology, Perth. http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2009/refereed/pelliccione.html.
16. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education 2003, Routledge, London, UK.
17. Salmon G. E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online 2000, Kogan Page, London.
18. Taylor P.G., Richardson A.S. Validating scholarship in university teaching: constructing a national scheme for external peer review of ICT-based teaching and learning resources (technical report) 2001, Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra, Australia, (Commonwealth of Australia).
19. Van Note Chism N., Chism G.W. Peer review of teaching: a sourcebook 2007, Anker Pub. Co, Bolton, Mass. second ed.
20. Wang Q. Student-facilitators' role in moderating online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 39(5):859-874.
21. Wood D., Friedel M. Peer review of online learning and teaching: harnessing collective intelligence to address emerging challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2009, 25(1):60-79.
22. Wozniak H., Silveira S. Online discussion: promoting effective student to student interaction. Beyond the Comfort Zone 2004, 956-960. Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, Perth, 5-8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/wozniak.html, R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, R. Phillips (Eds.).
23. Wyllie A. Eager 'weavers': designing assessment for an online environment. Nursing Education in a Global Community: Collaboration and Networking for the Future 2010, 15th April 2010, 3rd International Nurse Education Conference, Sydney, Australia.