New developments in percutaneous techniques for simple and complex branched renal stones

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 154-160

  Cracco, Cecilia M ^a   Scoffone, Cesare M ^a   Scarpa, Roberto M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Branched renal stone; complex urolithiasis; endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery; prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy; supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC COMBINED INTRARENAL SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HOLMIUM LASER; HUMAN; KIDNEY SURGERY; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPINE POSITION; ULTRASOUND;

HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY, LASER; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PATIENT POSITIONING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79951679266     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283436d32     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Canes D, Hegarty NJ, Kamoi K, et al. Functional outcomes following percu-taneous surgery in the solitary kidney. J Urol 2009; 181:154-160.
2. Falahatkar S, Panahandeh Z, Ashoori E, et al. What is the difference between percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with and without previous open renal surgery? J Endourol 2009; 23:1107-1110.
3. Gupta NP, Mishra S, Seth A, Anand A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in abnormal kidneys: single-center experience. Urology 2009; 73:710-714.
4. Probst CE, Denstedt JD, Razvi H. Preoperative indications for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in 2009. J Endourol 2009; 23:1557-1561.
5. Yuruk E, Tefekli A, Sari E, et al. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithot-omy? J Urol 2009; 181:663-667.
6. Caione P, Matarazzo E, Battaglia S. Stonetreatment in children: where weare today? Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:45-48.
7. Frattini A, Ferretti S, Salvaggio A. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in children: experience of Parma. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:51-52.
8. Gonen M, Turunc T, Ozturk B, et al. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithot-omy in children having complex stones. Urol Int 2009; 83:416-419.
9. Goumas-Kartalas I, Montanari E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal deformities. J Endourol 2010; 24:1081-1089.
10. Karami H, Mazloomfard MM, Golshan A, et al. Does age affect outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol J 2010; 7:17-21.
11. Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU, et al. Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multiinstitutional experience. J Endourol 2010; 24:531-536.
12. Ozden E, Bilen CY, Mercimek MN, et al. Horseshoe kidney: does it really have any negative impact on surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urology 2010; 75:1049-1052.
13. Poullain J, Devevey JM, Mousson C, Michel F. Management of lithiasis of kidney transplant. Prog Urol 2010; 20:138-143.
14. Preminger GM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an extreme technical make-over for an old technique. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:23-25.
15. Resorlu B, Kara C, Senokak C, et al. Effect of previous open renal surgeryand failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2010; 24:13-16.
16. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for high burden renal stones. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:41-42.
17. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Schuster T, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy stratified by body mass index. J Endourol 2010; 24:547-550.
18. Umbreit EC, Childs MA, Patterson DE, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large or multiple upper tract calculi and autosomic dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Urol 2010; 183:183-187.
19. Yuruk E, Binbay M, Sari E, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of the management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi. J Urol 2010; 183: 1424-1428.
20. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephro-lithotomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51:899-906.
21. Skolarikos A, De La Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 160:1975-1978.
22. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008; 53:184-190. (Pubitemid 350166715)
23. Zuazu JR, Hruza M, Rassweiler JJ, De La Rosette JJMCH. The Clavien classification system to optimize the documentation of PCNL morbidity. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:20-22.
24. Ghani KR, Patel U, Anson K. Computed tomography for percutaneous renal access. J Endourol 2009; 23:1633-1639.
25. Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 2009; 181:668-672.
26. Hyams ES, Shah O. Evaluations and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure. Curr Urol Rep 2010; 11:80-86.
27. Mancini JG, Ferrandino MN. The impact of new methods of imaging on radiation dosage delivered to patients. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20:163-168.
28. Basiri A, Mohammadi Sichani M, Hosseini SR, et al. X-ray-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position with ultrasound guidance. World J Urol 2010; 28:239-244.
29. Patel U, Walkden RM, Ghani KR, Anson K. Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:1280-1288.
30. Gedik A, Tutus A, Kayan D, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: is computerized tomography a must? Urol Res; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 20396872.
31. Bruyère F, Leroux C, Brunereau L, Lermusiaux P. Rapid prototyping model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training. J Endourol 2008; 22:91-96.
32. Ferrandino MN, Pierre SA, Simmons WN, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing: improved determination of urinary stone composition. J Endourol 2010; 24:347-354.
33. Kalogeropoulou C, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN. Imaging in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:1571-1577.
34. Preminger GM. High burden and complex renal calculi: aggressive percuta-neous nephrolithotomy versus multimodal approaches. Arch It Urol Androl 2010; 82:37-40.
35. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Bensalah K, et al. Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management. J Urol 2010; 183:188-193.
36. Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of postpercuta-neous nephrolithotomy residual stone fragments. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1751-1755.
37. Miano R, Scoffone CM, De Nunzio C, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2010; 24:931-938.
38. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 2007; 100:233-236. (Pubitemid 46878573)
39. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, et al. Endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol 2008; 54:1393-1403.
40. Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. The patient position for PNL: does it matter? Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:30-31.
41. De La Rosette JJ, Tsakiris P, Ferrandino MN, et al. Beyond prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur Urol 2008; 54:1262-1269.
42. Chedid Neto EA, Mitre AI, Mendes Gomez C, et al. Percutaneous nephro-lithotripsywith patients in a modified supine position.J Urol 2007; 178:165-168. (Pubitemid 46898483)
43. Manohar T, Jain P, Dasai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effective approach to high-riskand morbidlyobese patients. J Endourol 2007; 21:44-49.
44. Steele D, Marshall V. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach?J Endourol 2007; 21:1433-1437.
45. De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 2008; 54:196-203.
46. Falahaktar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, et al.Completesupinepercutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol 2008; 22:2513-2517.
47. Basiri A, Mohammadi Sichani M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy, is it really effective? A systematic review of literature. Urol J 2009; 6:73-77.
48. Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, Wei Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in supine versus prone position. J Endourol 2010; 24:1941-1946.
49. Wu P, Wang L, Wang K. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 20628815.
50. Daels F, Gonzalez MS, Freire FG, et al. Percutaneous lithotripsy in Valdivia-Galdakao decubitus position: our experience. J Endourol 2009; 23:1615-1620.
51. Falahatkar S, Enshaei A, Afsharimoghaddam A, et al. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy with lung inflation avoids the need for a supracostal puncture.J Endourol 2010; 24:213-218
52. Akman T, Sari E, Binbay M, et al. Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn calculi in those with single and multiple ac-cesses. J Endourol 2010; 24:955-960.
53. Ganpule AP, Mishra S, Desai MR. Multiperc versus single perc with flexible instrumentation for staghorn calculi. J Endourol 2009; 23:1675-1678.
54. Sun Y, Gao X, Zhou T, et al. 70 W holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1687-1691.
55. Gu Z, Qi J, Shen H, et al. Percutaneous nephroscopicwith holmium laserand ultrasound lithotripsy for complicated renal calculi. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25:577-580.
56. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, et al.Arandomized comparison oftubeless and standard percutaneousnephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2008; 22:439-442. (Pubitemid 351430710)
57. Giusti G, Maugeri O, Taverna G, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithot-omy: our experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010; 82:34-36.
58. Kara C, Resorlu B, Bayundir M, Unsai A. A randomized comparison oftotally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients. Urology 2010; 76:289-294.
59. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indian J Urol 2010; 26:16-24.
60. Zilberman DE, Lipkin ME, De La Rosette JJ, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the new standard of care? J Urol 2010; 184:1261-1266.
61. Chloe CH, L'Esperance JO, Auge BK. The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents for tube less percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23:1733-1738.
62. Aghamir SM, Mohammadi A, Mosavibahar SH, Meysamie AP. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renalanomalies. J Endourol 2008; 22:2131-2134.
63. Istanbullouglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless? Urology 2010; 75:1043-1048.
64. Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Kurien A, et al. Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL BJU Int 2010; 106:1045-1048.