Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Our experience

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 34-36

  Giusti, Guido ^a   Maugeri, Orazio ^a   Taverna, Gianluigi ^a   Benetti, Alessio ^a   Zandegiacomo, Silvia ^a   Peschechera, Roberto ^a   Graziotti, Pierpaolo ^a  

^a HUMANITAS CLINICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Italy)

Author keywords

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Tubeless approach; Urolithiasis

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HEMATOCRIT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953317502     PISSN: 11243562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1997; 157:1578-82.
2. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2001; 58:345-50.
3. Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of the first 112 patients. Urology 2002; 59:527-531. (Pubitemid 34249876)
4. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized study of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 2004; 172:565-7.