Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy, is it really effective? A systematic review of literature

Urology Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 73-77

  Basiri, Abbas ^a   Mohammadi Sichani, Mehrdad ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Kidney calculi; Methods; Percutaneous nephrostomy; Prone position; Supine position; Surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUPINE POSITION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUPINE POSITION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 66549090307     PISSN: 17351308     EISSN: 1735546X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology. 2002;60:388-92.
2. Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Urban DA, De Leo BC, Carbone JM. Percutaneous stone removal with the patient in a flank position. J Urol. 1994;151:686-8.
3. Clayman RV, Bub P, Haaff E, Dresner S. Prone flexible cystoscopy: an adjunct to percutaneous stone removal. J Urol. 1987;137:65-7.
4. Rana AM, Bhojwani JP, Junejo NN, Das Bhagia S. Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons?--with comprehensive technique. Urology. 2008;71:581-5.
5. De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008;54:196-202.
6. Zhou X, Gao X, Wen J, Xiao C. Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of realtime ultrasound: report of 92 cases. Urol Res. 2008;36:111-4.
7. Ng MT, Sun WH, Cheng CW, Chan ES. Supine position is safe and effective for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004;18:469-74.
8. Neto EA, Mitre AI, Gomes CM, Arap MA, Srougi M. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy with the patient in a modified supine position. J Urol. 2007;178:165-8; discussion 8.
9. Manohar T, Jain P, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effective approach to high-risk and morbidly obese patients. J Endourol. 2007;21:44-9.
10. Valdivia Uria JG, Valle Gerhold J, Lopez Lopez JA, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol. 1998;160:1975-8.
11. Steele D, Marshall V. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach? J Endourol. 2007;21:1433-7.
12. el-Kenawy MR, el-Kappany HA, el-Diasty TA, Ghoneim MA. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for renal stones in over 1000 patients. Br J Urol. 1992;69:470-5.
13. Jones DJ, Russell GL, Kellett MJ, Wickham JE. The changing practice of percutaneous stone surgery. Review of 1000 cases 1981-1988. Br J Urol. 1990;66:1-5.
14. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 1985;134:1077-81.