Assessing blood pressure accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a national survey environment

American Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 322-327

  Ostchega, Yechiam ^a   Prineas, Ronald J ^b   Nwankwo, Tatiana ^a   Zipf, George ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

aneroid; blood pressure; hypertension; mercury sphygmomanometer; NHANES

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANEROID SPHYGMOMANOMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MANOMETER; MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS;

EID: 79951674147     PISSN: 08957061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2010.232     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Messelbeck J, Sutherland L. Applying environmental product design to biomedical products research. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108 Suppl 6: 997-1002. (Pubitemid 32117971)
2. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ; Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005; 45:142-161. (Pubitemid 40066429)
3. Reinders A, Jones CR, Cuckson AC, Shennan AH. The Maxi Stabil 3: validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8:83-89. (Pubitemid 36677278)
4. Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12:29-33.
5. Ma Y, Temprosa M, Fowler S, Prineas RJ, Montez MG, Brown-Friday J, Carrion-Petersen ML, Whittington T; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting. Am J Hypertens 2009; 22:263-266.
6. Prineas RJ, Ostchega Y, Carroll M, Dillon C, McDowell M. US demographic trends in mid-arm circumference and recommended blood pressure cuffs for children and adolescents: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-2004. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12:75-80. (Pubitemid 46412112)
7. Ostchega Y, Dillon C, Carroll M, Prineas RJ, McDowell M. US demographic trends in mid-arm circumference and recommended blood pressure cuffs: 1988-2002. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19:885-891. (Pubitemid 41637605)
8. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289:2560-2572. (Pubitemid 37430158)
9. National Center for Health Statistics Analytic Guidelines (article online). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/nhanes2003-2004/analytical- guidelines (2004).
10. Ostchega Y, Nwankwo T, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Zipf G. Assessing the validity of the Omron HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in a National Survey environment. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010; 12:22-28.
11. Canzanello VJ, Jensen PL, Schwartz GL. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings? Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:729-731. (Pubitemid 32200227)
12. Ostchega Y, Prineas RJ, Paulose-Ram R, Grim CM, Willard G, Collins D. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000: effect of observer training and protocol standardization on reducing blood pressure measurement error. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56:768-774. (Pubitemid 37040813)
13. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Questionnaire and Exam Protocol. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/ questexam. htm
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8:135-160. (Pubitemid 29425900)
15. McNemar's Test for Correlated Proportions in the Marginals of a 2x2 Contingency Table. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/propcorr.html
16. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:420-428.
17. Markandu ND, Whitcher F, Arnold A, Carney C. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14:31-36. (Pubitemid 30113628)
18. Mion D, Pierin AM. How accurate are sphygmomanometers? J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12:245-248. (Pubitemid 28197282)
19. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. AAMI: Arlington, VA, 1992.
20. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322:531-536. (Pubitemid 32230920)