Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion revisited

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 355-356

  Murkin, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA CLAMPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; MORTALITY; NOTE; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 33745632077     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00270.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Alghamdi, Latter (in this issue).
2. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ. A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Aug; 110(2):340-8
3. Abramov D, Tamariz M, Serrick CI, Sharp E, Noel D, Harwood S. Christakis GT, Goldman BS. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass flow charactetstics on the clinical outcome of 1820 coronary bypass patients. Can. J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 15:19(3):237-43
4. Taylor KM. Bain WH, Davidson KG, Turner MA. Comparative clinical study of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in 350 consecutive patients. Thorax. 1982 May;37(5):324-3
5. Steed DL, Follette DM, Foglia R, et al: Effects of pulsatile assistance and nonpulsatile flow on subendocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1978;26(2):133-141.
6. Edgerton JR, Herbert MA, Jones KK, et al: On-pump beating heart surgery offers an alternative for unstable patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum 2004;7:8-15.