Electrophysiological correlates of visually processing subject's own name

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 491, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-147

  Zhao, Ke ^a,b   Wu, Qi ^a,b   Zimmer, Hubert D ^c   Fu, Xiaolan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related potential; N250; P300; SON

Indexed keywords

E1A ASSOCIATED P300 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACE; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LANGUAGE; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; RECOGNITION; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NAMES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951578810     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.025     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Begleiter H., Porjesz B., Wang W. Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 94:41-49.
2. Berlad I., Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 96:472-474.
3. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 1986, 77:305-327.
4. Cherry E.C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1953, 25:975-979.
5. Harris C., Pashler H., Coburn N. Momy revisited: high-priority affective stimuli and visual search. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2004, 57:1-3.
6. Herzmann G., Schweinberger S.R., Sommer W., Jentzsch I. What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:688-701.
7. Holeckova I., Fischer C., Giard M.H., Delpuech C., Morlet D. Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Res. 2006, 1082:142-152.
8. Johnson S.C., Baxter L.C., Wilder L.S., Pipe J.G., Heiserman J.E., Prigatano G.P. Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain 2002, 125:1808-1814.
9. Kiehl K.A., Laurens K.R., Duty T.L., Forster B.B., Liddle P.F. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:133-142.
10. Kramer A.F., Strayer D.L. Assessing the development of automatic processing: an application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biol. Psychol. 1988, 26:231-267.
11. Kurtz J.B., Lee T.W., Pickering D. Atrocious associated gastroenteritis in a children's ward. J. Clin. Pathol. 1977, 30:948-952.
12. Laureys S., Owen A.M., Schiff N.D. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2004, 3:537-546.
13. Matsuda T., Hira S., Nakata M., Kakigi S. The effect of one's own name on event-related potentials: event-related potential (P3 and CNV) as an index of detection of deception (2). Jpn. J. Physiol. Psychophysiol. 1990, 8:9-18. (in Japanese with English abstract).
14. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1959, 11:56-60.
15. Naatanen R., Simpson M., Loveless N.E. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol. 1982, 14:53-98.
16. Newcombe F., De Haan E.H.F., Ross J., Young A. Face processing, laterality and contrast sensitivity. Neuropsychologia 1989, 27:179-191.
17. Ninonfiya H., Onitsuka T., Chen C.H., Sato E., Fashiro N. P300 in response to the subject's own face. Psychiatr. Clin. Neurosci. 1998, 52:519-522.
18. Perrin F., Garca-Larrea L., Mauguiere F., Bastuji H. A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1999, 110:2153-2164.
19. Perrin F., Bastuji H., Mauguière F., García-Larrea L. Functional dissociation of the early and late portions of human K-complexes. Neuroreport 2000, 11:1637-1640.
20. Perrin F., Maquet P., Peigneux P., Ruby P., Degueldre C., Balteau E., Fiore G.D., Moonen G., Luxen A., Laureys S. Neural mechanisms involved in the detection of our first name: a combined ERPs and PET study. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:12-19.
21. Pfutze E.M., Sommer W., Schweinberger S.R. Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychol. Aging 2002, 17:140-160.
22. Rossion B., Campanella S., Gomez C.M., Delinte A., Debatisse D., Liard L., Dubois S., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., Guerit J.M. Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1999, 110:449-462.
23. Schweinberger S.R., Pickering E.C., Burton A.M., Kaufmann J.M. Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:2057-2073.
24. Shapiro K.L., Caldwell J., Sorensen R.E. Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual " cocktail party" effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. 1997, 23:504-514.
25. Valentine T., Bredart S., Lawson R., Ward G. What's in a name? Access to information from people's names. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 1991, 3:147-176.
26. Van D., Lancker Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain Cogn. 1991, 17:64-92.
27. Wickens C., Kramer A., Vanasse L., Donchin E. Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 1983, 221:1080-1082.
28. Wolford G., Morrison F. Procesing of unattended visual information. Mem. Cogn. 1980, 8:521-527.
29. Wood N., Cowan N. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn 1995, 21:255-260.
30. Zhao K., Yuan J.J., Zhong Y.P., Peng Y.S., Chen J., Zhou L.P., Fan W., Ding D.Q. Event-related potential correlates of the collective self-relevant effect. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 464:57-61.